Literature DB >> 24121979

Can DNA fragmentation of neat or swim-up spermatozoa be used to predict pregnancy following ICSI of fertile oocyte donors?

Jaime Gosálvez1, Pedro Caballero, Carmen López-Fernández, Leonor Ortega, José Andrés Guijarro, José Luís Fernández, Stephen D Johnston, Rocío Nuñez-Calonge.   

Abstract

This study compared the potential of assessing sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) from neat semen and the subsequent swim-up (SU) procedure to predict pregnancy when conducting ICSI of fertile donor oocytes. Infertile females (n=81) were transferred embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of their partner's spermatozoa and proven donor oocytes. This model normalized the impact of female factor in putative sperm DNA repair. Semen was blindly assessed for SDF using Halosperm immediately following ejaculation (NS) and after swim-up at the time of ICSI fertilisation. There was a decrease in SDF values of the ejaculated semen sample following the swim-up protocol (P=0.000). Interestingly, pregnancy could be equally predicted from SDF values derived from either neat or swim-up semen samples. Receiver operator curves and the derived Youden's indices determined SDF cutoff values for NS and SU of 24.8% and 17.5%, respectively. Prediction of pregnancy from NS SDF had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 69%, whereas for SU SDF was 78% and 73%, respectively. While increased levels of SDF negatively impact reproductive outcome, we have shown that a reduction in SDF following sperm selection using ICSI with proven donor oocytes is not mandatory for achieving pregnancy. This suggests that a certain level of DNA damage that is not detectable using current technologies could be impacting on the relative success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. Consequently, we propose a modification of the so called 'iceberg model' as a possible rationale for understanding the role of SDF in reproductive outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121979      PMCID: PMC3854048          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  58 in total

Review 1.  Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques.

Authors:  Donald P Evenson; Kjersten L Larson; Lorna K Jost
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men.

Authors:  D S Guzick; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; C K Brazil; S T Nakajima; C Coutifaris; S A Carson; P Cisneros; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; D Xu; D L Vogel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique.

Authors:  Mehdi Benchaib; Valérie Braun; Jacqueline Lornage; Samia Hadj; Bruno Salle; Hervé Lejeune; Jean François Guérin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.

Authors:  M Spanò; J P Bonde; H I Hjøllund; H A Kolstad; E Cordelli; G Leter
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongxiang Li; Liquan Wang; Jie Cai; Hefeng Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment.

Authors:  D Evenson; L Jost
Journal:  Methods Cell Sci       Date:  2000

7.  Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity.

Authors:  A Zini; A Finelli; D Phang; K Jarvi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Michael R Virro; Kjersten L Larson-Cook; Donald P Evenson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel; Marjam Hajimohammad; Thomas Stalf; Christiaan Hoogendijk; Claas Mehnert; Roelof Menkveld; Holger Gips; Wolf-Bernhard Schill; Thinus F Kruger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity, viability, and unreacted acrosomal status.

Authors:  Gabor Huszar; Ciler Celik Ozenci; Sevil Cayli; Zoltan Zavaczki; Eleonora Hansch; Lynne Vigue
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage II: the effect of sperm concentration adjustment during processing.

Authors:  Eva Tvrdá; Francisca Arroyo; Michal Ďuračka; Carmen López-Fernández; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Rakesh K Sharma; Jaime Gosálvez; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Reduced sperm DNA longevity is associated with an increased incidence of still born; evidence from a multi-ovulating sequential artificial insemination animal model.

Authors:  Stephen D Johnston; Carmen López-Fernández; Francisca Arroyo; Altea Gosálbez; Elva I Cortés Gutiérrez; Jose-Luis Fernández; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Dynamic assessment of human sperm DNA damage I: the effect of seminal plasma-sperm co-incubation after ejaculation.

Authors:  Eva Tvrdá; Francisca Arroyo; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

7.  Sperm selection during ICSI treatments reduces single- but not double-strand DNA break values compared to the semen sample.

Authors:  Sandra Lara-Cerrillo; Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Candela Rosado-Iglesias; Tania Lacruz-Ruiz; Jordi Benet; Agustín García-Peiró
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maartje Cissen; Madelon van Wely; Irma Scholten; Steven Mansell; Jan Peter de Bruin; Ben Willem Mol; Didi Braat; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predictive value of sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation index in male infertility.

Authors:  Budi Wiweko; Pramety Utami
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2017-02-21

10.  Morphometric comparison by the ISAS® CASA-DNAf system of two techniques for the evaluation of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Sara Sadeghi; Almudena García-Molina; Ferran Celma; Anthony Valverde; Sogol Fereidounfar; Carles Soler
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.