Literature DB >> 33660206

Sperm selection during ICSI treatments reduces single- but not double-strand DNA break values compared to the semen sample.

Sandra Lara-Cerrillo1, Jordi Ribas-Maynou2, Candela Rosado-Iglesias1, Tania Lacruz-Ruiz1, Jordi Benet2, Agustín García-Peiró3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To detect a possible bias in sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing when performed on semen samples or on those few spermatozoa selected for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) treatments.
METHODS: A multimethodological analysis of Single- and Double-Strand DNA Breaks (SSB and DSB, respectively) was performed through the Neutral Comet, the Alkaline Comet, the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) and the Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick End Labelling (TUNEL) assays. SDF was evaluated in (i) semen samples from 23 infertile patients (not achieving pregnancy or suffering recurrent miscarriage); (ii) samples after a Swim-up and (iii) spermatozoa microselected for ICSI (ICSI-S).
RESULTS: The analysis of 3217 ICSI-S revealed a significant reduction of SSB values compared to the Ejaculate and the Swim-up samples. On the contrary, DSB values were not reduced after any sperm selection method. The No-pregnancy group presented poorer semen parameters and higher SSB values. The Recurrent miscarriage group presented better semen parameters but also higher DSB values.
CONCLUSION: The analysis of SDF on semen samples may not be fully representative of those few spermatozoa selected for ICSI. Since oxidative stress impairs sperm motility and causes SSB, selecting a motile sperm may intrinsically imply choosing a sperm not affected by this damage. DSB have an enzymatic origin which does not affect motility, making it difficult to select a sperm without this damage. Therefore, ICSI treatments could be effective in patients presenting high SSB values. Patients presenting high DSB values should expect bad ICSI results if this damage is not reduced through other specific methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comet assay; Double-strand breaks; ICSI; Sperm DNA fragmentation; Sperm selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33660206      PMCID: PMC8190426          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02129-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  74 in total

Review 1.  The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Osman; H Alsomait; S Seshadri; T El-Toukhy; Y Khalaf
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Live birth and miscarriage rate following intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Montserrat Duran-Retamal; Guy Morris; Chiara Achilli; Matthew Gaunt; Efstathios Theodorou; Wael Saab; Paul Serhal; Srividya Seshadri
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 3.  Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.

Authors:  Christina Wang; Ronald S Swerdloff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates.

Authors:  Aida Casanovas; Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Sandra Lara-Cerrillo; Ana Raquel Jimenez-Macedo; Olga Hortal; Jordi Benet; Joan Carrera; Agustín García-Peiró
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Clinical utility of sperm DNA damage in male infertility.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 7.  Protamines and male infertility.

Authors:  Rafael Oliva
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Sperm DNA fragmentation measured by Halosperm does not impact on embryo quality and ongoing pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI treatments.

Authors:  G Anifandis; T Bounartzi; C I Messini; K Dafopoulos; R Markandona; S Sotiriou; A Tzavella; I E Messinis
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.775

9.  Pregnancy prediction by free sperm DNA and sperm DNA fragmentation in semen specimens of IVF/ICSI-ET patients.

Authors:  Theofania Bounartzi; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; George Anifandis; Christina I Messini; Chrysoula Koutsonikou; Spyros Kouris; Maria Satra; Sotirios Sotiriou; Nicholas Vamvakopoulos; Ioannis E Messinis
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.767

10.  ATM and PRDM9 regulate SPO11-bound recombination intermediates during meiosis.

Authors:  Jacob Paiano; Wei Wu; Shintaro Yamada; Nicholas Sciascia; Elsa Callen; Ana Paola Cotrim; Rajashree A Deshpande; Yaakov Maman; Amanda Day; Tanya T Paull; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sperm DNA damage compromises embryo development, but not oocyte fertilisation in pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Marc Yeste; Yentel Mateo-Otero; Marc Llavanera; Sandra Recuero; Ariadna Delgado-Bermúdez; Isabel Barranco
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.612

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.