Eva Tvrdá1, Francisca Arroyo2, Jaime Gosálvez2. 1. Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, Nitra, 94976, Slovakia. evina.tvrda@gmail.com. 2. Unit of Genetics, Department of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of seminal plasma in human ejaculates on the sperm DNA quality and DNA longevity. METHODS: Semen samples for this study were obtained from 20 donors with a normal spermiogram. Following centrifugation, the sperm pellet was resuspended either in the seminal plasma proceeding from its respective donor, or in an equal amount of PBS, adjusting the concentration to 50 × 106/ml. Each set of samples was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the sperm DNA damage was assessed using the chromatin-dispersion test following 0, 2, 6, and 24 h of incubation. RESULTS: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) did not differ between the two experimental conditions at T0; however, Kaplan-Meier estimates to test for survival showed an statistical significant increase of SDF in the seminal plasma group when compared to the PBS group following all timeframes (p 0.000). With respect to sperm DNA longevity, the most dramatic loss of sperm DNA quality occurred during the first 2 h of incubation, with the rate of SDF (rSDF) in the seminal plasma being 2.1 more intense than in PBS. Interestingly, the rSDF was found to vary significantly between individuals, which was confirmed with significant correlations in all rSDF timeframes (rSDF T0-2, p 0.049; rSDF T2-6, p 0.000; rSDF T6-24: p 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Co-incubation of semen samples in seminal plasma after ejaculation increases iatrogenic sperm damage. This effect is statistically significant after 2 h of co-incubation. Subsequently, for ART purposes seminal plasma must be quickly removed after ejaculation-liquefaction, to avoid a higher susceptibility of sperm DNA towards fragmentation.
AIM: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of seminal plasma in human ejaculates on the sperm DNA quality and DNA longevity. METHODS: Semen samples for this study were obtained from 20 donors with a normal spermiogram. Following centrifugation, the sperm pellet was resuspended either in the seminal plasma proceeding from its respective donor, or in an equal amount of PBS, adjusting the concentration to 50 × 106/ml. Each set of samples was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the sperm DNA damage was assessed using the chromatin-dispersion test following 0, 2, 6, and 24 h of incubation. RESULTS: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) did not differ between the two experimental conditions at T0; however, Kaplan-Meier estimates to test for survival showed an statistical significant increase of SDF in the seminal plasma group when compared to the PBS group following all timeframes (p 0.000). With respect to sperm DNA longevity, the most dramatic loss of sperm DNA quality occurred during the first 2 h of incubation, with the rate of SDF (rSDF) in the seminal plasma being 2.1 more intense than in PBS. Interestingly, the rSDF was found to vary significantly between individuals, which was confirmed with significant correlations in all rSDF timeframes (rSDF T0-2, p 0.049; rSDF T2-6, p 0.000; rSDF T6-24: p 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Co-incubation of semen samples in seminal plasma after ejaculation increases iatrogenic sperm damage. This effect is statistically significant after 2 h of co-incubation. Subsequently, for ART purposes seminal plasma must be quickly removed after ejaculation-liquefaction, to avoid a higher susceptibility of sperm DNA towards fragmentation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fertility; Male factor; Seminal plasma; Sperm DNA fragmentation
Authors: Jaime Gosálvez; Pedro Caballero; Carmen López-Fernández; Leonor Ortega; José Andrés Guijarro; José Luís Fernández; Stephen D Johnston; Rocío Nuñez-Calonge Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: J Auger; F Eustache; B Ducot; T Blandin; M Daudin; I Diaz; S E Matribi; B Gony; L Keskes; M Kolbezen; A Lamarte; J Lornage; N Nomal; G Pitaval; O Simon; I Virant-Klun; A Spira; P Jouannet Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Sandro C Esteves; Jaime Gosálvez; Carmen López-Fernández; Rocío Núñez-Calonge; Pedro Caballero; Ashok Agarwal; José Luis Fernández Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan Journal: Andrologia Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.775