Literature DB >> 24116533

Psychometric properties associated with perceived vocal roughness using a matching task.

David A Eddins1, Rahul Shrivastav.   

Abstract

A psychophysical matching paradigm has been used to better quantify voice quality under laboratory conditions. The goals of this study were to establish which of two candidate comparison stimuli would best ensure that the range of perceived vocal roughness could be adequately bracketed using a matching task and to provide a general solution to the problem of estimating vocal roughness. Psychometric functions for roughness matching indicated that a speech-like sawtooth-plus-noise complex (20 dB signal-to-noise ratio) amplitude modulated by a sinusoidal function raised to the 4th power yielded a comparison stimulus with a perceptual dynamic range well suited for roughness matching.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116533      PMCID: PMC3779263          DOI: 10.1121/1.4819183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.

Authors:  B R Gerratt; J Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Developing a single comparison stimulus for matching breathy voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt; Mika Ito
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Periodic signals with minimal power fluctuations.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; J Pumplin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Identifying a comparison for matching rough voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Relationship of spectral noise levels to psychophysical scaling of vowel roughness.

Authors:  M A Toner; F W Emanuel; D Parker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-06

7.  Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments.

Authors:  G de Krom
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08

8.  Integrated software for analysis and synthesis of voice quality.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Norma Antoñanzas-Barroso; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-11

9.  Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: a comparison of psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.009

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The psychophysics of roughness applied to dysphonic voice.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Lisa M Kopf; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.