Literature DB >> 7474973

Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments.

G de Krom1.   

Abstract

This study deals with the relation between listeners' ratings of pathological breathiness and roughness and certain characteristics of the voice spectrum. Two general research questions were addressed: First, which spectral parameters may serve as useful predictors of breathiness and roughness? Second, does the type of speech fragment used for analysis have an effect on the obtained regression model? Listener ratings of breathiness and roughness were obtained for three types of vowel fragments: a vowel onset segment, a mid-vowel (post-onset) segment, and a vowel segment covering the onset and the acoustically more stable post-onset parts. Results indicated that the harmonics-to-noise ratio was the best single predictor of both rated breathiness and roughness, explaining up to 54% of the true rating variance. By combining different predictors, between 75% and 80% of the breathiness variance could be explained for all three types of fragments. For roughness, a strong effect of fragment type was observed, with most variance explained in vowel onset fragments (71%), and least in post-onset fragments (52%). The effect of fragment type was also observed when regression analyses were performed with six predictors based on a factor analysis of the acoustic data.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7474973     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3804.794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  20 in total

1.  Perceptual interaction of the harmonic source and noise in voice.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual sensitivity to first harmonic amplitude in the voice source.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dynamics of phonatory posturing at phonation onset.

Authors:  Travis L Shiba; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Psychometric properties associated with perceived vocal roughness using a matching task.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Aging Effect on Korean Female Voice: Acoustic and Perceptual Examinations of Breathiness.

Authors:  Seung Jin Lee; YoonHee Cho; Ji Yeon Song; DamHee Lee; Yunjung Kim; HyangHee Kim
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  Identifying a comparison for matching rough voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Acoustic and perceptual effects of left-right laryngeal asymmetries based on computational modeling.

Authors:  Robin A Samlan; Brad H Story; Andrew J Lotto; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Detection of high-frequency energy level changes in speech and singing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Andrew J Lotto; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual consequences of changes in epilaryngeal area and shape.

Authors:  Robin A Samlan; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Supraja Anand; Arturo Camacho; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.