Literature DB >> 22215034

Developing a single comparison stimulus for matching breathy voice quality.

Sona Patel1, Rahul Shrivastav, David A Eddins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this experiment, a single comparison stimulus was developed as a reference in a perceptual matching task for the quantification of breathy voice quality. Perceptual judgments of a set of synthetic voice samples were compared to previous data obtained using multiple comparison stimuli "customized" for different voices (Patel, Shrivastav, & Eddins, 2010).
METHOD: Five male and 5 female samples of the vowel /a/ were selected from the Kay Elemetrics Disordered Voice Database and resynthesized using a Klatt synthesizer. Eleven samples were created for each base voice by manipulating the aspiration noise level. Five samples from each continuum were evaluated in a perceptual matching task in which a single sawtooth and noise comparison stimulus was used to obtain breathiness judgments. Linear regression was used to compare measurements obtained using the new comparison stimulus against the customized comparison stimuli.
RESULTS: Results indicated that the noncustomized sawtooth comparison provides reliability and perceptual distances between stimuli similar to those obtained using customized comparison stimuli.
CONCLUSION: A single-variable matching task using a single comparison stimulus can be used to obtain perceptual estimates of breathiness across voices and experiments in a laboratory setting. This technique will help develop models of voice-quality perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215034      PMCID: PMC3612287          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0337)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  17 in total

1.  Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions.

Authors:  D A Robin; D Tranel; H Damasio
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Direct magnitude estimation and equal appearing interval scaling of vowel roughness.

Authors:  M A Toner; F W Emanuel
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-03

4.  Visual and haptic angle perception in the matching task.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1971-12

Review 5.  Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research.

Authors:  K R Scherer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; G B Kempster; A Erman; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

7.  Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments.

Authors:  B R Gerratt; J Kreiman; N Antonanzas-Barroso; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

8.  Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: a comparison of psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Equal-loudness contours using subjective tinnitus as the standard.

Authors:  M J Penner
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-06

10.  Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Christine M Sapienza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins; Supraja Anand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychometric properties associated with perceived vocal roughness using a matching task.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Identifying a comparison for matching rough voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Supraja Anand; Arturo Camacho; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.