Literature DB >> 26723336

The psychophysics of roughness applied to dysphonic voice.

David A Eddins1, Lisa M Kopf2, Rahul Shrivastav3.   

Abstract

Roughness is a sound quality that has been related to the amplitude modulation characteristics of the acoustic stimulus. Roughness also is considered one of the primary elements of voice quality associated with natural variations across normal voices and is a salient feature of many dysphonic voices. It is known that the roughness of tonal stimuli is dependent on the frequency and depth of amplitude modulation and on the carrier frequency. Here, it is determined if similar dependencies exist for voiced speech stimuli. Knowledge of such dependencies can lead to a better understanding of the acoustic characteristics of vocal roughness along the continuum of normal to dysphonic and may facilitate computational estimates of vocal roughness. Synthetic vowel stimuli were modeled after talkers selected from the Satloff/Heman-Ackah disordered voice database. To parametrically control amplitude modulation frequency and depth, synthesized stimuli had minimal amplitude fluctuations, and amplitude modulation was superimposed with the desired frequency and depth. Perceptual roughness judgments depended on amplitude modulation frequency and depth in a manner that closely matched data from tonal carriers. The dependence of perceived roughness on amplitude modulation frequency and depth closely matched the roughness of sinusoidal carriers as reported by Fastl and Zwicker [(2007) Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723336      PMCID: PMC4691258          DOI: 10.1121/1.4937753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Psychometric properties associated with perceived vocal roughness using a matching task.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers.

Authors:  T Dau; B Kollmeier; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Identifying a comparison for matching rough voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Mapping Thyroarytenoid and Cricothyroid Activations to Postural and Acoustic Features in a Fiber-Gel Model of the Vocal Folds.

Authors:  Anil Palaparthi; Simeon Smith; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.679

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.