Literature DB >> 24115061

Compensations for increased rotational inertia during human cutting turns.

Mu Qiao1, Brian Brown, Devin L Jindrich.   

Abstract

Locomotion in a complex environment is often not steady state, but unsteady locomotion (stability and maneuverability) is not well understood. We investigated the strategies used by humans to perform sidestep cutting turns when running. Previous studies have argued that because humans have small yaw rotational moments of inertia relative to body mass, deceleratory forces in the initial velocity direction that occur during the turning step, or 'braking' forces, could function to prevent body over-rotation during turns. We tested this hypothesis by increasing body rotational inertia and testing whether braking forces during stance decreased. We recorded ground reaction force and body kinematics from seven participants performing 45 deg sidestep cutting turns and straight running at five levels of body rotational inertia, with increases up to fourfold. Contrary to our prediction, braking forces remained consistent at different rotational inertias, facilitated by anticipatory changes to body rotational speed. Increasing inertia revealed that the opposing effects of several turning parameters, including rotation due to symmetrical anterior-posterior forces, result in a system that can compensate for fourfold changes in rotational inertia with less than 50% changes to rotational velocity. These results suggest that in submaximal effort turning, legged systems may be robust to changes in morphological parameters, and that compensations can involve relatively minor adjustments between steps to change initial stance conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Locomotion; Maneuverability; Motor control; Sidestep; Stability; Unsteady

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24115061      PMCID: PMC4008127          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.087569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  39 in total

1.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Kinematics of 90 degrees running turns in wild mice.

Authors:  Rebecca M Walter
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bipedalism in lizards: whole-body modelling reveals a possible spandrel.

Authors:  Peter Aerts; Raoul Van Damme; Kristiaan D'Août; Bieke Van Hooydonck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Muscle activation patterns of selected lower extremity muscles during stepping and cutting tasks.

Authors:  Jeff Houck
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  A three-dimensional biomechanical comparison between turning strategies during the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  M J D Taylor; P Dabnichki; S C Strike
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living.

Authors:  Brian C Glaister; Greta C Bernatz; Glenn K Klute; Michael S Orendurff
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 7.  Maneuvers during legged locomotion.

Authors:  Devin L Jindrich; Mu Qiao
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

8.  An analysis of the sidestep cutting manoeuvre.

Authors:  M J Cross; N J Gibbs; G J Bryant
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The independent effects of gravity and inertia on running mechanics.

Authors:  Y H Chang; H W Huang; C M Hamerski; R Kram
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia.

Authors:  D R Carrier; R M Walter; D V Lee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Healthy individuals are more maneuverable when walking slower while navigating a virtual obstacle course.

Authors:  Katherine L Hsieh; Riley C Sheehan; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  General and Specific Strategies Used to Facilitate Locomotor Maneuvers.

Authors:  Mengnan Wu; Jesse H Matsubara; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effect of foot posture on capacity to apply free moments to the ground: implications for fighting performance in great apes.

Authors:  David R Carrier; Christopher Cunningham
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  Effects of a Six-Week Strength Training Programme on Change of Direction Performance in Youth Team Sport Athletes.

Authors:  Frank A Bourgeois; Paul Gamble; Nic D Gill; Mike R McGuigan
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24

Review 5.  The Effect of Angle and Velocity on Change of Direction Biomechanics: An Angle-Velocity Trade-Off.

Authors:  Thomas Dos'Santos; Christopher Thomas; Paul Comfort; Paul A Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  A unified energy-optimality criterion predicts human navigation paths and speeds.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Brown; Nidhi Seethapathi; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.