Literature DB >> 29494819

Healthy individuals are more maneuverable when walking slower while navigating a virtual obstacle course.

Katherine L Hsieh1, Riley C Sheehan2, Jason M Wilken3, Jonathan B Dingwell4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining stability, especially in the mediolateral direction, is important for successful walking. Navigating in the community, however, may require people to reduce stability to make quick lateral transitions, creating a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability. Walking slower can improve stability during steady state walking, but there remains a need to better understand how walking speed influences maneuverability. This study investigated how walking at different speeds influenced how individuals modulate both stability and maneuverability in a virtual obstacle course.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill in a virtual environment for 6 trials each at typical and slower speed. Participants made repeated transitions between virtual sets of arches displayed in any of 4 lanes. Participants were instructed to walk under the arches and hit as few arches as possible. To quantify stability, mean step width and mean lateral margin of stability (Mean MOS) were calculated and averaged for ipsilateral and contralateral steps. To quantify maneuverability, the number of arches hit when entering or exiting each arch set was calculated and averaged for each condition.
RESULTS: Participants exhibited high levels of variability in their stepping patterns. Mean MOS and mean step width were significantly greater for the typical speed than slower speed for the ipsilateral steps (p < 0.001). Participants hit more arches during the typical speed than during the slow speed (p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: When walking at the slower speed, healthy individuals exhibited decreased stability of ipsilateral steps, but increased maneuverability and better transition performance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateral transitions; Maneuverability; Margin of stability; Walking speed

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494819      PMCID: PMC5866787          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  28 in total

1.  Reliability and Minimal Detectible Change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults.

Authors:  Jason M Wilken; Kelly M Rodriguez; Melissa Brawner; Benjamin J Darter
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  The influence of walking speed and gender on trunk sway for the healthy young and older adults.

Authors:  Krissy M T Goutier; Sophie L Jansen; Corinne G C Horlings; Ursula M Küng; John H J Allum
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.

Authors:  At L Hof; Renske M van Bockel; Tanneke Schoppen; Klaas Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Maneuvers during legged locomotion.

Authors:  Devin L Jindrich; Mu Qiao
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  Stability versus maneuverability in aquatic locomotion.

Authors:  Daniel Weihs
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Older adults adopted more cautious gait patterns when walking in socks than barefoot.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Tsai; Sang-I Lin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Compensations for increased rotational inertia during human cutting turns.

Authors:  Mu Qiao; Brian Brown; Devin L Jindrich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Laura C Marin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Frontal plane dynamic margins of stability in individuals with and without transtibial amputation walking on a loose rock surface.

Authors:  Deanna H Gates; Shawn J Scott; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Speed impacts frontal-plane maneuver stability of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Carolina Viramontes; Mengnan/Mary Wu; Julian Acasio; Janis Kim; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Humans use multi-objective control to regulate lateral foot placement when walking.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Effects of age, physical and self-perceived balance abilities on lateral stepping adjustments during competing lateral balance tasks.

Authors:  Meghan E Kazanski; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.746

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.