Literature DB >> 14561343

Bipedalism in lizards: whole-body modelling reveals a possible spandrel.

Peter Aerts1, Raoul Van Damme, Kristiaan D'Août, Bieke Van Hooydonck.   

Abstract

This paper illustrates how simple mechanical models based on morphological, ethological, ecological and phylogenetic data can add to discussions in evolutionary biology. Bipedal locomotion has evolved on numerous occasions in lizards. Traits that appear repeatedly in independent evolutionary lines are often considered adaptive, but the exact advantages of bipedal locomotion in lizards remain debated. Earlier claims that bipedalism would increase maximal running speed or would be energetically advantageous have been questioned. Here, we use 'whole body' mechanical modelling to provide an alternative solution to the riddle. The starting point is the intermittent running style combined with the need for a high manoeuvrability characterizing many small lizard species. Manoeuvrability benefits from a caudal shift of the centre of mass of the body (body-COM), because forces to change the heading and to align the body to this new heading do not conflict with each other. The caudally situated body-COM, however, might result in a lift of the front part of the body when accelerating (intermittent style), thus resulting in bipedal running bouts. Based on a momentum-impulse approach the effect of acceleration is quantified for a mechanical model, a virtual lizard (three segments) based on the morphometrics of Acanthodactylus erythrurus (a small lacertid lizard). Biologically relevant input (dimensions, inertial properties, step cycle information, etc.) results in an important lift of the front part of the body and observable distances passively covered bipedally as a consequence of the acceleration. In this way, no functional explanation of the phenomenon of lizard bipedalism is required and bipedalism can probably be considered non-adaptive in many cases. This does not exclude, however, some species that may have turned this consequence to their benefit. For instance, instantaneous manipulation of the position of the centre of the body-COM allows stable, persisting bipedal running. Once this was achieved, the bipedal spandrel could be exploited further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561343      PMCID: PMC1693243          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  9 in total

1.  The anatomy and function of the pelvic girdle and hindlimb in lizard locomotion.

Authors:  R C SNYDER
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1954-07

2.  Reappraisal of energetics of locomotion shows identical cost in bipeds and quadrupeds including ostrich and horse.

Authors:  M A Fedak; H J Seeherman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

4.  Mechanics of locomotion in lizards.

Authors:  C T Farley; T C Ko
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Running on two or on four legs: which consumes more energy?

Authors:  C R Taylor; V J Rowntree
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Many-legged maneuverability: dynamics of turning in hexapods

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Energetics of bipedal running. I. Metabolic cost of generating force.

Authors:  T J Roberts; R Kram; P G Weyand; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia.

Authors:  D J Irschick; B C Jayne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Comparative three-dimensional kinematics of the hindlimb for high-speed bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion of lizards

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Muscle directly meets the vast power demands in agile lizards.

Authors:  Nancy A Curtin; Roger C Woledge; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Tail autotomy affects bipedalism but not sprint performance in a cursorial Mediterranean lizard.

Authors:  Pantelis Savvides; Maria Stavrou; Panayiotis Pafilis; Spyros Sfenthourakis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-12-21

3.  Linking locomotor performance to morphological shifts in urban lizards.

Authors:  Kristin M Winchell; Inbar Maayan; Jason R Fredette; Liam J Revell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Body and tail-assisted pitch control facilitates bipedal locomotion in Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Christofer J Clemente; Nicholas C Wu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  In search of the pitching momentum that enables some lizards to sustain bipedal running at constant speeds.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Compensations for increased rotational inertia during human cutting turns.

Authors:  Mu Qiao; Brian Brown; Devin L Jindrich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Lizards ran bipedally 110 million years ago.

Authors:  Hang-Jae Lee; Yuong-Nam Lee; Anthony R Fiorillo; Junchang Lü
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of body movement on yaw motion in bipedal running lizard by dynamic simulation.

Authors:  Jeongryul Kim; Hongmin Kim; Jaeheung Park; Hwa Soo Kim; TaeWon Seo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pitch then power: limitations to acceleration in quadrupeds.

Authors:  Sarah B Williams; Huiling Tan; James R Usherwood; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.703

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.