Literature DB >> 12682105

Kinematics of 90 degrees running turns in wild mice.

Rebecca M Walter1.   

Abstract

Turning is a requirement for locomotion on the variable terrain that most terrestrial animals inhabit and is a deciding factor in many predator-prey interactions. Despite this, the kinematics and mechanics of quadrupedal turns are not well understood. To gain insight to the turning kinematics of small quadrupedal mammals, six adult wild mice were videotaped at 250 Hz from below as they performed 90 degrees running turns. Four markers placed along the sagittal axis were digitized to allow observation of lateral bending and body rotation throughout the turn. Ground contact periods of the fore- and hindlimbs were also noted for each frame. During turning, mice increased their ground contact time, but did not change their stride frequency relative to straight running at maximum speed. Postcranial body rotation preceded deflection in heading, and did not occur in one continuous motion, but rather in bouts of 15-53 degrees. These bouts were synchronized with the stride cycle, such that the majority of rotation occurred during the second half of forelimb support and the first half of hindlimb support. In this phase of the stride cycle, the trunk was sagittally flexed and rotational inertia was 65% of that during maximal extension. By synchronizing body rotation with this portion of the stride cycle, mice can achieve a given angular acceleration with much lower applied torque. Compared with humans running along curved trajectories, mice maintained relatively higher speeds at proportionately smaller radii. A possible explanation for this difference lies in the more crouched limb posture of mice, which increases the mechanical advantage for horizontal ground force production. The occurrence of body rotation prior to deflection in heading may facilitate acceleration in the new direction by making use of the relatively greater force production inherent in the parasagittal limb posture of mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12682105     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mechanical properties and ground reaction forces in normal and hypermuscular mice.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitt; Ann C Zumwalt; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Accounting for elite indoor 200 m sprint results.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Coordination of steering in a free-trotting quadruped.

Authors:  Eyal Gruntman; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Compensations for increased rotational inertia during human cutting turns.

Authors:  Mu Qiao; Brian Brown; Devin L Jindrich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Genetic regulation of canine skeletal traits: trade-offs between the hind limbs and forelimbs in the fox and dog.

Authors:  Anastasia V Kharlamova; Lyudmila N Trut; David R Carrier; Kevin Chase; Karl G Lark
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  The effect of curve running on distal limb kinematics in the Thoroughbred racehorse.

Authors:  Rebecca S V Parkes; Thilo Pfau; Renate Weller; Thomas H Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mass enhances speed but diminishes turn capacity in terrestrial pursuit predators.

Authors:  Rory P Wilson; Iwan W Griffiths; Michael G L Mills; Chris Carbone; John W Wilson; David M Scantlebury
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Deceptive body movements reverse spatial cueing in soccer.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Robin C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.