Literature DB >> 24113902

Effect of patient navigation on time to diagnostic resolution among patients with colorectal cancer-related abnormalities.

Ji-Hyun Lee1, William Fulp, Kristen J Wells, Cathy D Meade, Ercilia Calcano, Richard Roetzheim.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether a patient navigation (PN) program is effective in reducing delay in diagnostic resolution among medically underserved patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)-related abnormalities in Tampa Bay, Florida. This study involved ten primary care clinics randomized either to receive navigation or to serve as controls (five clinics per arm). Each clinic identified all subjects with CRC-related abnormalities in the year prior to the clinic beginning participation in the Moffitt Patient Navigator Research Program. Patients with CRC-related abnormalities were navigated from the time of a colorectal abnormality to diagnostic resolution. Control patients received usual care, and outcome information was obtained from medical record abstraction. Using a frailty Cox proportional hazard model, we examined the length of time between colorectal abnormality and definitive diagnosis. One hundred ninety-three patients were eligible for the study because of a CRC-related abnormality (75 navigated and 118 controls). Analysis of PN effect by two time periods of resolution (0-4 and >4 months) showed a lagged effect of PN. The adjusted time-varying PN effect on diagnostic resolution compared to the controls was marginally significant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.29) after controlling for insurance status. The predicted aHR at 4 months was 1.2, but showed no significant effect until 12 months. For patients having an abnormal symptom of CRC, PN appeared to have a positive effect over time and sped diagnostic resolution after 4 months. However, the small sample size limits drawing a definitive conclusion regarding the positive PN effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24113902      PMCID: PMC3945676          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0561-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  26 in total

1.  Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Atkin; Rob Edwards; Ines Kralj-Hans; Kate Wooldrage; Andrew R Hart; John M A Northover; D Max Parkin; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Innovative approaches to reducing cancer health disparities: the Moffitt Cancer Center Patient Navigator Research Program.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Cathy D Meade; Ercilia Calcano; Ji-Hyun Lee; Desiree Rivers; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

Review 6.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A national patient navigator training program.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Calhoun; Elizabeth M Whitley; Angelina Esparza; Elizabeth Ness; Amanda Greene; Roland Garcia; Patricia A Valverde
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2008-12-30

8.  Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Randa Sifri; Heather Bittner-Fagan; Nora C Katurakes; James Cocroft; Melissa Dicarlo; Thomas Wolf
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  M L Tørring; M Frydenberg; R P Hansen; F Olesen; W Hamilton; P Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith Naylor; James Ward; Blase N Polite
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic Evaluation of Patients Presenting to Primary Care with Rectal Bleeding.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Lydia E Pace; Kevin H Nguyen; Charis N Crofton; Katharine A Normandin; Sara J Singer; Meredith B Rosenthal; Alyna T Chien
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Paul C Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Victoria Warren-Mears; Douglas Post; Mary Ann S Van Duyn; Kevin Fiscella; Julie Darnell; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Adherence in the Cancer Care Setting: a Systematic Review of Patient Navigation to Traverse Barriers.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Michael R Kaufman; Taylor Shackleford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

Review 5.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Managing risk in cancer presentation, detection and referral: a qualitative study of primary care staff views.

Authors:  Neil Cook; Gillian Thomson; Paola Dey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A McBrien; Noah Ivers; Lianne Barnieh; Jacob J Bailey; Diane L Lorenzetti; David Nicholas; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Richard Lewanczuk; Alun Edwards; Ted Braun; Braden Manns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Revital Azulay; Liora Valinsky; Fabienne Hershkowitz; Racheli Magnezi
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.773

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.