Literature DB >> 18725824

Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening.

Ronald E Myers1, Terry Hyslop, Randa Sifri, Heather Bittner-Fagan, Nora C Katurakes, James Cocroft, Melissa Dicarlo, Thomas Wolf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized. Effective methods to increase screening use are needed. This study sought to determine the impact of tailored navigation on CRC screening in primary care.
METHODS: The study included 154 primary care practice patients who were 50 or more years of age, were eligible for CRC screening, and had an office visit within 2 years before study initiation. Baseline telephone survey data were collected on participant sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, and screening test [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or colonoscopy] decision stage. By comparing decision stage data, we identified that test with the highest decision stage (ie, preferred screening test). Participants who preferred FOBT were sent an FOBT kit and a reminder. Those preferring colonoscopy were sent colonoscopy instructions. After this mailing, a study patient navigator made a telephone call to guide participants towards screening. Six-month end point survey and medical records data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of screening and of change in preferred screening test decision stage.
RESULTS: At end point, 63 (41%) study participants had screened. From baseline to end point, overall screening preference increased for 75 (63%) participants. Age and perceived salience and coherence (ie, screening is important and sensible) were positive, significant predictors of screening use (P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively); while only age predicted change in overall screening preference (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Study participant screening use and preference increased. Age and attitudes predicted outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to determine intervention impact at the population level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725824     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  44 in total

1.  Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; Michael Kositch; Thomas Hickey; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Clinicians' panel management self-efficacy to support their patients' smoking cessation and hypertension control needs.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Ashley E Jensen; Katelyn Bennett; Nicole Skursky; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Barrier-focused intervention to increase colonoscopy attendance among nonadherent high-risk populations.

Authors:  Wen Meng; Xi-Wen Bi; Xiao-Yin Bai; Hua-Feng Pan; Shan-Rong Cai; Qi Zhao; Su-Zhan Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Increasing Disparity in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Among African Americans and Whites: A State's Experience.

Authors:  Noelle K Loconte; Amy Williamson; Arlene Gayle; Jennifer Weiss; Ticiana Leal; Jeremy Cetnar; Tabraiz Mohammed; Amye Tevaarwerk; Nathan Jones
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011

6.  Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Tiffany Edwards; Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-19

7.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effects of test preference, test access, and navigation on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Constantine Daskalakis; Sally W Vernon; Randa Sifri; Melissa DiCarlo; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Andrel Sendecki; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Increasing colon cancer screening in primary care among African Americans.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Constantine Daskalakis; Melissa DiCarlo; Praveen Ramakrishnan Geethakumari; James Cocroft; Christopher Minnick; Nancy Brisbon; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Adana A Llanos; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Chul-joo Lee; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.