Literature DB >> 24111508

Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically 'risky' reproductive decisions.

Felicity K Boardman1.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the condition being tested for is increasingly acknowledged as an important factor in prenatal testing and screening decisions. An analysis of the way in which family members living with an inheritable condition use and value this knowledge has much to add to debates about whether and how this type of knowledge could be made available to prospective parents facing screening decisions. This article reports on in-depth interviews (conducted between 2007 and 2009) with 61 people with a genetic condition, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in their family. Many participants reported that their intimate familial knowledge of SMA offered them valuable insights with which they could imagine future lives. Other participants, however, found themselves trapped between their experiential knowledge of SMA and their (often) competing responsibility to maintain the wellbeing of their family. Still, others established a hierarchy of knowledge to rank the authenticity of different family member's accounts of SMA in order to discredit or justify their decisions. This article highlights the way in which experiential knowledge of the condition being tested for cannot be unproblematically assumed to be a useful resource in the context of prenatal testing decisions and may actually constrain reproductive decisions.
© 2013 The Author. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2013 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disability; experiential knowledge; families; genetic risk; spinal muscular atrophy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24111508     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  8 in total

Review 1.  Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The role of experiential knowledge within attitudes towards genetic carrier screening: A comparison of people with and without experience of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Philip J Young; Oliver Warren; Frances E Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  "Ultimately, mom has the call": Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy.

Authors:  Gladys B Asiedu; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Katherine Carroll; Aminah Jatoi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  ART with PGD: Risky heredity and stratified reproduction.

Authors:  Ilana Löwy
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-11-05

7.  "I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Anticipated stigma and blameless guilt: Mothers' evaluation of life with the sex-linked disorder, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XHED).

Authors:  Angus Clarke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.634

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.