Literature DB >> 29305706

Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research.

Patricia Cubi-Molla1, Koonal Shah2, Kristina Burström3,4,5.   

Abstract

Whether health values should be elicited from the perspective of patients or the general public is still an open debate. The overall aim of this paper is to increase knowledge on the role of experience in health preference-based valuation research. The objectives of this paper are threefold. First, we elaborate the idea of experience-based (EB) values under the informed value or knowledge viewpoint. We think the whole scope of knowledge about the health states involved in valuation exercises is not fully integrated in the previous literature. For instance, personal knowledge based on past experiences, contemplating the health state as a likely future condition, knowing someone who is currently experiencing the state, or just receiving detailed information about the health states; all these situations capture different nuances of health-related experience which are not explicitly referred to in valuation tasks. Second, we propose a framework where the extended factor of experience is detached from other factors interwoven into the valuation exercise. Third, we examine how experience is tackled in different value sets (EB or non-EB) identified via a literature review. We identified the following elements (and items) in a value set: health state (without description, described using a multi-attribute instrument, described using other method), reference person (the respondent; other person, similar/known/hypothetical), time frame (past, present, future), raters (public, representative/convenience; vested interest, patients/other) and experience (personal experience, past/present/future; vicarious experience, affective/non-affective; no experience). Forty-nine valuation exercises were extracted from 22 reviewed papers and classified following our suggested set of elements and items. The results show that the role of experience reported in health valuation-related papers is frequently disregarded or, at most, minimised to the item of personal experience (present)-linked to self-reported health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305706     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0292-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  46 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Understanding differences between self-ratings and population ratings for health in the EuroQOL.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities.

Authors:  Sarah J Whitehead; Shehzad Ali
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states.

Authors:  Kim U Wittrup-Jensen; Jørgen Lauridsen; Claire Gudex; Kjeld M Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Developing methods that really do value the 'Q' in the QALY.

Authors:  Paul Dolan
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2008-01

6.  Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: a social value set for Latin Americans.

Authors:  Victor Zarate; Paul Kind; Ling-Hsiang Chuang
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?

Authors:  G A De Wit; J J Busschbach; F T De Charro
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: a meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities.

Authors:  Yvette Peeters; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Oppe; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Koonal Shah; Juan M Ramos-Goñi; Nan Luo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states.

Authors:  Kristina Burström; Sun Sun; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Martin Henriksson; Magnus Johannesson; Lars-Åke Levin; Niklas Zethraeus
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  10 in total

1.  Valuing EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment: Do Adult and Adolescent Preferences Differ?

Authors:  David J Mott; Koonal K Shah; Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi; Nancy J Devlin; Oliver Rivero-Arias
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.

Authors:  Mimmi Åström; Helen Conte; Jenny Berg; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.440

3.  Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states.

Authors:  Olivia Ernstsson; Mimmi Åström; Gert Helgesson; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Predictive ability of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification system on health-related quality of life of patients after total hip replacement: comparisons across eight EQ-5D-3L value sets.

Authors:  Fitsum Sebsibe Teni; Kristina Burström; Jenny Berg; Reiner Leidl; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Happy with Your Capabilities? Valuing ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A States Based on Experienced Utility Using Subjective Well-Being Data.

Authors:  Sebastian Himmler; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A note on the relationship between age and health-related quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Jamie Garside; Mike Herdman; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Influence of elicitation procedure and phrasing on health state valuations in experience-based time trade-off tasks among diabetes patients in China.

Authors:  Shuang Hao; Emelie Heintz; Gert Helgesson; Sophie Langenskiöld; Jiaying Chen; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values.

Authors:  Koonal K Shah; Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi; Simone Kreimeier; Nancy J Devlin
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-06-06

9.  Comparison of Adult and Adolescent Preferences Toward EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States.

Authors:  Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Juan M Ramos-Goñi; Marko Ogorevc; Simone Kreimeier; Kristina Ludwig; Wolfgang Greiner
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol.

Authors:  Tonya Moen Hansen; Ylva Helland; Liv Ariane Augestad; Kim Rand; Knut Stavem; Andrew Garratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.