Literature DB >> 24110390

Safe direct current stimulator 2: concept and design.

Gene Y Fridman, Charles C Della Santina.   

Abstract

Essentially all neuroprostheses use alternating biphasic current pulses to stimulate neural tissue. While this method can effectively excite neurons, it is not very effective for inhibiting them. In contrast, direct current (DC) can excite, inhibit, and modulate sensitivity of neurons. However, DC stimulation is biologically unsafe because it violates safe charge injection criteria. We have previously described the concept of a safe direct current stimulator (SDCS) that overcomes this constraint. The SDCS drives DC ionic current into the tissue by switching fluid valves in phase with biphasic current pulses delivered to the metal electrodes within the device. The original prototype of this device, SDCS1, could both suppress and excite the vestibular nerve with DC stimulation delivered by the device. In the process of building the SDCS1 we identified several problems that must be addressed to further develop this technology. Consequently, we designed the SDCS2, which eliminates periodic interruptions in stimulation current flow observed in the original SDCS1 design and is small enough for head-mounted use in chronic animal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24110390      PMCID: PMC4034342          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bionic vision: system architectures: a review.

Authors:  Thomas Guenther; Nigel H Lovell; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses.

Authors:  T L Rose; L S Robblee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  High-frequency activity in experimental and clinical epileptic foci.

Authors:  Premysl Jiruska; Anatol Bragin
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Electrical suppression of tinnitus.

Authors:  J M Aran; Y Cazals
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1981

6.  Safe direct current stimulation to expand capabilities of neural prostheses.

Authors:  Gene Y Fridman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Bladder voiding by combined high frequency electrical pudendal nerve block and sacral root stimulation.

Authors:  Adam Boger; Narendra Bhadra; Kenneth J Gustafson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Effectiveness of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain: design, method and protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kerstin Luedtke; Alison Rushton; Christine Wright; Tim P Juergens; Gerd Mueller; Arne May
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Electronics for a Safe Direct Current Stimulator.

Authors:  Patrick Ou; Gene Fridman
Journal:  IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf       Date:  2018-03-29

2.  Miniature Elastomeric Valve Design for Safe Direct Current Stimulator.

Authors:  Chaojun Cheng; Raviraj Thakur; Ankitha Rajagopalan Nair; Scott Sterrett; Gene Fridman
Journal:  IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf       Date:  2018-03-29

3.  Safe Direct Current Stimulator design for reduced power consumption and increased reliability.

Authors:  Gene Fridman
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2017-07

4.  A Carbon Slurry Separated Interface Nerve Electrode for Electrical Block of Nerve Conduction.

Authors:  Tina L Vrabec; Jesse S Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Laura Shaw; Kevin L Kilgore; Niloy Bhadra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  The vestibular implant: frequency-dependency of the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  Raymond van de Berg; Nils Guinand; T A Khoa Nguyen; Maurizio Ranieri; Samuel Cavuscens; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Robert Stokroos; Herman Kingma; Angelica Perez-Fornos
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20

6.  Differential expression of voltage-gated sodium channels in afferent neurons renders selective neural block by ionic direct current.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Michael Anderson; Shaoqiu He; Kimberly Stephens; Yu Zheng; Zhiyong Chen; Srinivasa N Raja; Felix Aplin; Yun Guan; Gene Fridman
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Reversible conduction block in peripheral nerve using electrical waveforms.

Authors:  Niloy Bhadra; Tina L Vrabec; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 8.  Implantable Direct Current Neural Modulation: Theory, Feasibility, and Efficacy.

Authors:  Felix P Aplin; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A Hydrogel-Based Microfluidic Nerve Cuff for Neuromodulation of Peripheral Nerves.

Authors:  Raviraj Thakur; Felix P Aplin; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.891

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.