Literature DB >> 24103552

International test results for objective lens quality, resolution, spectral accuracy and spectral separation for confocal laser scanning microscopes.

Richard W Cole1, Marc Thibault, Carol J Bayles, Brady Eason, Anne-Marie Girard, Tushare Jinadasa, Cynthia Opansky, Katherine Schulz, Claire M Brown.   

Abstract

As part of an ongoing effort to increase image reproducibility and fidelity in addition to improving cross-instrument consistency, we have proposed using four separate instrument quality tests to augment the ones we have previously reported. These four tests assessed the following areas: (1) objective lens quality, (2) resolution, (3) accuracy of the wavelength information from spectral detectors, and (4) the accuracy and quality of spectral separation algorithms. Data were received from 55 laboratories located in 18 countries. The largest source of errors across all tests was user error which could be subdivided between failure to follow provided protocols and improper use of the microscope. This truly emphasizes the importance of proper rigorous training and diligence in performing confocal microscopy experiments and equipment evaluations. It should be noted that there was no discernible difference in quality between confocal microscope manufactures. These tests, as well as others previously reported, will help assess the quality of confocal microscopy equipment and will provide a means to track equipment performance over time. From 62 to 97% of the data sets sent in passed the various tests demonstrating the usefulness and appropriateness of these tests as part of a larger performance testing regiment.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24103552     DOI: 10.1017/S1431927613013470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Microanal        ISSN: 1431-9276            Impact factor:   4.127


  9 in total

1.  Any Way You Slice It-A Comparison of Confocal Microscopy Techniques.

Authors:  James Jonkman; Claire M Brown
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-07

Review 2.  A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.

Authors:  Sheenah M Mische; Nancy C Fisher; Susan M Meyn; Katia Sol-Church; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Frances Weis-Garcia; Marie Adams; John M Ashton; Kym M Delventhal; Julie A Dragon; Laura Holmes; Pratik Jagtap; Kristopher E Kubow; Christopher E Mason; Magnus Palmblad; Brian C Searle; Christoph W Turck; Kevin L Knudtson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-04

3.  Semi-blind sparse affine spectral unmixing of autofluorescence-contaminated micrographs.

Authors:  Blair J Rossetti; Steven A Wilbert; Jessica L Mark Welch; Gary G Borisy; James G Nagy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics.

Authors:  Orestis Faklaris; Leslie Bancel-Vallée; Aurélien Dauphin; Baptiste Monterroso; Perrine Frère; David Geny; Tudor Manoliu; Sylvain de Rossi; Fabrice P Cordelières; Damien Schapman; Roland Nitschke; Julien Cau; Thomas Guilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.077

Review 5.  Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods.

Authors:  Paula Montero Llopis; Rebecca A Senft; Tim J Ross-Elliott; Ryan Stephansky; Daniel P Keeley; Preman Koshar; Guillermo Marqués; Ya-Sheng Gao; Benjamin R Carlson; Thomas Pengo; Mark A Sanders; Lisa A Cameron; Michelle S Itano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  A beginner's guide to rigor and reproducibility in fluorescence imaging experiments.

Authors:  Jen-Yi Lee; Maiko Kitaoka
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Using the NoiSee workflow to measure signal-to-noise ratios of confocal microscopes.

Authors:  Alexia Ferrand; Kai D Schleicher; Nikolaus Ehrenfeuchter; Wolf Heusermann; Oliver Biehlmaier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  eSIP: A Novel Solution-Based Sectioned Image Property Approach for Microscope Calibration.

Authors:  Malte Butzlaff; Arwed Weigel; Evgeni Ponimaskin; Andre Zeug
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Advanced light microscopy core facilities: Balancing service, science and career.

Authors:  Elisa Ferrando-May; Hella Hartmann; Jürgen Reymann; Nariman Ansari; Nadine Utz; Hans-Ulrich Fried; Christian Kukat; Jan Peychl; Christian Liebig; Stefan Terjung; Vibor Laketa; Anje Sporbert; Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters; Astrid Schauss; Werner Zuschratter; Sergiy Avilov
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.