Vichuda Lousuebsakul-Matthews1, Donna L Thorpe2, Raymond Knutsen3, W Larry Beeson3, Gary E Fraser3, Synnove F Knutsen3. 1. 1Department of Health Services,Los Angeles County,CA,USA. 2. 3Department of Physical Therapy,School of Allied Health Professions,Loma Linda University,Loma Linda,CA,USA. 3. 2Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Loma Linda University,Loma Linda,CA 92350,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In contrast to non-vegetarians, vegetarians consume more legumes and meat analogues as sources of protein to substitute for meat intake. The present study aimed to assess the association between foods with high protein content (legumes, meat, meat analogues) by dietary pattern (vegetarians, non-vegetarians) and hip fracture incidence, adjusted for selected lifestyle factors. DESIGN: A prospective cohort of Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) enrollees who completed a comprehensive lifestyle and dietary questionnaire between 2002 and 2007. SETTING: Every two years after enrolment, a short questionnaire on hospitalizations and selected disease outcomes including hip fractures was sent to these members. SUBJECTS: Respondents (n 33,208) to a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: In a multivariable model, legumes intake of once daily or more reduced the risk of hip fracture by 64% (hazard ratio = 0·36, 95% CI 0·21, 0·61) compared with those with legumes intake of less than once weekly. Similarly, meat intake of four or more times weekly was associated with a 40% reduced risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio = 0·60, 95% CI 0·41, 0·87) compared with those whose meat intake was less than once weekly. Furthermore, consumption of meat analogues once daily or more was associated with a 49 % reduced risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio = 0·51, 95% CI 0·27, 0·98) compared with an intake of less than once weekly. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture incidence was inversely associated with legumes intake and, to a lesser extent, meat intake, after accounting for other food groups and important covariates. Similarly, a high intake of meat analogues was associated with a significantly reduced risk of hip fracture.
OBJECTIVE: In contrast to non-vegetarians, vegetarians consume more legumes and meat analogues as sources of protein to substitute for meat intake. The present study aimed to assess the association between foods with high protein content (legumes, meat, meat analogues) by dietary pattern (vegetarians, non-vegetarians) and hip fracture incidence, adjusted for selected lifestyle factors. DESIGN: A prospective cohort of Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) enrollees who completed a comprehensive lifestyle and dietary questionnaire between 2002 and 2007. SETTING: Every two years after enrolment, a short questionnaire on hospitalizations and selected disease outcomes including hip fractures was sent to these members. SUBJECTS: Respondents (n 33,208) to a baseline and a follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: In a multivariable model, legumes intake of once daily or more reduced the risk of hip fracture by 64% (hazard ratio = 0·36, 95% CI 0·21, 0·61) compared with those with legumes intake of less than once weekly. Similarly, meat intake of four or more times weekly was associated with a 40% reduced risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio = 0·60, 95% CI 0·41, 0·87) compared with those whose meat intake was less than once weekly. Furthermore, consumption of meat analogues once daily or more was associated with a 49 % reduced risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio = 0·51, 95% CI 0·27, 0·98) compared with an intake of less than once weekly. CONCLUSIONS:Hip fracture incidence was inversely associated with legumes intake and, to a lesser extent, meat intake, after accounting for other food groups and important covariates. Similarly, a high intake of meat analogues was associated with a significantly reduced risk of hip fracture.
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Wilson K Smith; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; Huifeng Yun; Jie Zhang; Elizabeth S Delzell Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Shivani Sahni; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert R McLean; Katherine L Tucker; Kerry E Broe; Douglas P Kiel; Marian T Hannan Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Donna L Thorpe; W Lawrence Beeson; Raymond Knutsen; Gary E Fraser; Synnove F Knutsen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Keren Papier; Tammy Yn Tong; Paul N Appleby; Kathryn E Bradbury; Georgina K Fensom; Anika Knuppel; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Julie A Schmidt; Ruth C Travis; Timothy J Key Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Tammy Y N Tong; Paul N Appleby; Miranda E G Armstrong; Georgina K Fensom; Anika Knuppel; Keren Papier; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Ruth C Travis; Timothy J Key Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 8.775