Literature DB >> 24098779

The correlation of hippocampal T2-mapping with neuropsychology test in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Zhuren Luo1, Xiongjie Zhuang, Dushyant Kumar, Xiurong Wu, Cen Yue, Chengkun Han, Jiancheng Lv.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To deduce T2, the inverse of the transverse relaxation rate (R2), in the hippocampus of healthy adults; 2) to investigate the brain iron deposition in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and age-matched healthy controls using T2-values.
METHODS: T2-weighted data from the bilateral-hippocampi of ten AD patients and sixty healthy controls were collected at six echo time points using multi-slice multi-echo turbo spin echo (MSME-TSE) imaging on a 3.0 T MR-scanner, followed by the neuropsychological testing. The correlations between T2-values and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were investigated on group-wise basis (covariates in the group-wise analyses: gender, age, side and healthy/AD).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in hippocampal T2-values on intra-gender and inter-gender basis (P > 0.05). Hippocampal T2-values of both sides were similar (right: 85.2±2.4 milliseconds; left: 85.3±2.5 milliseconds). The bilateral hippocampal T2 values correlated moderately with age (right: r = -0.59; left: -0.58; P < 0.001). The AD-group had significantly lower T2-values in the hippocampus when compared to normal controls (P < 0.001) and such low T2-values had a strong positive correlation with the MMSE score (R (2) = 0.97; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients with AD showed significantly lower T2 values, which can be attributed to the increased iron depositions in the hippocampus. A positive correlation between T2-values and cognition scores suggests that quantitative T2 can be used in the early diagnosis of AD and in the monitoring of the treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098779      PMCID: PMC3786916          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia for the elderly. It is pathologically characterized by the presence of senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary degeneration (NFD) in cortical regions of the brain [1-3]. The redox-active biometals have been suggested to play considerable roles in the generation of the oxidative stress and in the modulation of amyloid-ß (Aß). Additionally, iron is recognized as a major cause of oxidative stress in AD. There is a close connection between the iron deposition and the AD on both regional and cellular levels. Postmortem biochemical studies have reported elevated iron concentrations in the hippocampus, cortical lobes, and basal ganglia regions of AD brains compared to controls [4-8]. Furthermore, the increased iron accumulation is shown in both SPs and NFD regions that are major sites for the catalytic redox activity [9,10]. Increasing evidences indicate that oxidative stress is one of the earliest events in the genesis of AD, and iron may play a crucial role [11]. Iron concentrations are elevated in cortex and basal ganglia in AD patients [4-6,12,13] indicating a disruption of iron homeostasis in the brain. Higher iron concentrations in AD brains may increase the possibility of free iron-catalyzed lipid peroxidation, which may cause cell membrane damages and subsequent cell deaths. Based on these findings, it is possible that iron chelators and inhibitors of the iron-dependent oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation (e.g., antioxidants or free radical scavengers) may have a therapeutic value [14-16]. Therefore, a quantitative measurement is required to assess and monitor the concentrations of iron deposited in the brain, which might provide a biomarker for early detection and design of therapeutic interventions. Iron, in the form of ferritin, can reduce T2 relaxation times or increase R2 (=1/T2) values, and so we applied quantitative MR imaging proton transverse relaxation rate (R2) which has the potential to measure brain iron content indirectly and manifest other features of AD pathology in vivo [17]. R2 (=1/T2), the transverse relaxation rate, describes the rate of dephasing of the hydrogen nuclei in specific structures [18] in the presence of external magnetic field. The R2 value of proton depends on volume and surface interaction effects of confining structures/ compartments [19] and hence, the proton in different environments (chemical or magnetic) would have different R2 values. Iron deposition causes local distortions of the effective magnetic field which enhances the relaxation rates of diffusing protons resulting in the increase of R2 (or decrease of T2) values. As a part of the middle temporal lobe composing the memory system, the hippocampus is one of the regions which is susceptible to damage from AD. Therefore, we chose hippocampus as the region of interest (ROI) for measurement of T2 (and R2) in this study. In this study, we applied quantitative MR imaging to measure the mean hippocampal T2 relaxation times (and R2 values) in 60 healthy adults, and then assess differences in T2 values in the hippocampi between patients with AD and normal controls which can be attributed to different iron accumulation levels in both groups. The main objectives of this study were: 1) to provide baseline data for the early diagnosis and the longitudinal monitoring of AD with hippocampal T2 relaxation times; 2) to prospectively investigate the abnormal iron deposition in the hippocampus of patients with AD using hippocampal T2 relaxation times (and R2 values) as a surrogate; and 3) to explore the relationship between the reduction in average T2 values, likely due to the iron level, and the neuropsychological tests in these patients reporting memory loss.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. The written informed consents were obtained from both groups: AD patients and healthy volunteers. In case the participants (AD patients) had impaired ability to consent, written consents were obtained from the next-of-kin or the care giver on their behalf.

Study population

Ten AD patients and 60 healthy adult volunteers of whom 10 controls were age-matched to the AD group were included in this prospective study (please refer to Table 1 for the demographic details and neuropsychological test scores of the participants). All the participants were right-handed. These patients underwent a series of neurological tests and a battery of neuropsychological assessments, which included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Acitivity of Daily Living (ADL), to rule out other causes of cognitive impairment. We choose the MMSE score to indicate the cognitive level and not the ADL as the ADL test needs much more time than the MMSE and has less specificity with cognitive level. All cases meet the NINCDS/ADRDA [20] criteria for clinically probable AD. Sixty healthy adult volunteers were recruited, with age ranging from 18 to 70 years. They were further divided into three subgroups according to the latest principles of age group set by WHO: 1) youth group of 20 cases, mean age: 34 ± 6 years; 2) middle-aged group of 20 cases, mean age: 51 ± 3 years; and 3) elderly group of 20 cases, mean age: 65 ± 4 years.
Table 1

Demographic details and neuropsychological test scores of the participants.

Control groupAD group
No. of individuals1010
Age (y)65±466±3
Gender % (no.) of men30 (3)40 (4)
Education (y)9.12±2.629.06±2.31
MMSE28.50±2.8718.90±2.99*
ADL21.82±2.0441.18±12.09*

Note: Only 10 age-matched healthy control data were included. Data are expressed as mean ±SD, except for gender. MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination. ADL: Activity of Daily Living.

Significant difference between control and AD group (P < 0.05, two-tailed t-test).

Note: Only 10 age-matched healthy control data were included. Data are expressed as mean ±SD, except for gender. MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination. ADL: Activity of Daily Living. Significant difference between control and AD group (P < 0.05, two-tailed t-test). Exclusion criteria included the following: patients with other brain diseases or with other causes of dementia supported by pathological brain scan and clinical findings, including significant cerebrovascular diseases (cortical infarctions, multiple lacunas lesions and chronic subdural hematoma); Parkinson’s disease; Huntington’s disease; Pick’s disease; Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Dementia with Lewy’s bodies; Corticobasal ganglionic degeneration; Progressive supranuclear palsy; Cancer (brain tumor or meningeal neoplasms); infection (AIDS, Neurosyphilis or Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy); Metabolic disorders (Hypothyroidism or Vitamin B12 deficiency) and patients with depression or dysthymia according to the DSM-IV criteria. Control subjects underwent a structured interview to exclude patients with cognitive dysfunction, substance abuse, depression, and other cerebral pathology.

Image acquisition

All the MR images were obtained using a 3.0-T MR system (Achieva 3.0 T TX; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) equipped with an eight-channel head coil. The head was immobilized in the head coil with foam padding. Conventional axial T1- and T2-weighted images were acquired for screening of space-occupying lesions and cerebrovascular diseases. A multi-slice multi-echo turbo spin echo sequence (MSME-TSE; sequence name on Philips scanner: sT 2Cal_TSE) was used to get the T2 map and was taken in parallel to the coronal-oblique images of hippocampus with the following parameters: A pulse repetition time (TR) of 2000 msec and 6 echo times (TE) of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 msec were used. Flip angle = 90°, number of slice = 5 slices, slice thickness = 3 mm, slice gap = 0 mm, NSA = 1, FOV = 160 mm × 160 mm, and matrix size = 380 × 310.

Image Analysis

The raw data acquired using the sequence sT 2Cal_TSE were transferred to a separate workstation (Philips Extended WorkSpace version 2.6.3.1), where the data were processed by a self-coded program to obtain the T2 map. After that, the T2 relaxation times [21] were calculated on the T2 map (Figure 1). R2 is defined as the reciprocal of the proton transverse relaxation time, T2 (i.e., R2 = 1/T2×1000). The units for T2 and R2 are millisecond (msec) and second-1 (sec-1), respectively. Regions of interest (ROIs) were first delineated on the intermediate echo time images (60 msec or 80 msec, Figure 1). ROIs were set to include the maximum contours of the hippocampus and exclude the hippocampal boundaries. Furthermore, the alveus and fimbria of hippocampus, and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the gyri uncinatus of the hippocampal head should be ruled out to reduce CSF partial volume effects. Manual tracing a ROI in a sample subject was illustrated on the representative long axial images of hippocampus in Figure 1. A trained neuroradiologist with more than 15 years of experience, who was blinded as to the subjects’ exact group, manually traced the ROIs. All the ROIs were remeasured two months later by the same reader on the same images. The final values were the means of the two measurements.
Figure 1

T2-weighted images at various echo time-points and resultant T2-map.

Row 1 & Row 2 consist of six T2-weighted images, taken at echo times of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 ms, covering the entire hippocampus of an AD patient and an elderly control. The single image in Row 3 is the corresponding T2 map. The bilateral hippocampal atrophy was visually found accompanied with a varied degree of decreased T2 values (or increased R2 values) in the AD patient. Illustration of the ROI selection on the representative spin-echo images (TE = 60, 80, 100 and 120 milliseconds) of a patient with AD and an elderly control. The hippocampal region for which T2 data were acquired is shown as representative regions of interest. Note: ROIs required include the hippocampal contours to be as large as possible but not involving its boundaries, and avoiding visible cystic areas and CSF in the hippocampal fissure.

T2-weighted images at various echo time-points and resultant T2-map.

Row 1 & Row 2 consist of six T2-weighted images, taken at echo times of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 ms, covering the entire hippocampus of an AD patient and an elderly control. The single image in Row 3 is the corresponding T2 map. The bilateral hippocampal atrophy was visually found accompanied with a varied degree of decreased T2 values (or increased R2 values) in the AD patient. Illustration of the ROI selection on the representative spin-echo images (TE = 60, 80, 100 and 120 milliseconds) of a patient with AD and an elderly control. The hippocampal region for which T2 data were acquired is shown as representative regions of interest. Note: ROIs required include the hippocampal contours to be as large as possible but not involving its boundaries, and avoiding visible cystic areas and CSF in the hippocampal fissure.

Statistical analysis

Group differences in age, education, and MMSE or ADL score were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with least significant differences post hoc analysis. Sex differences between groups were assessed by a χ2 test. The paired-sample t test was used to analyze the differences between the left and the right side of the hippocampus, and Student’s t test was employed to figure out if there were gender wise differences and ANOVA was adopted to identify the differences of T2 values among these subgroups in the healthy volunteers. Furthermore, the relationship between the T2-values and the age of subjects was analyzed using the Pearson’s Correlation test. Group differences in T2 (and R2) values were tested for significance by using one-tailed t test. Iron levels tend to increase with age, but typically reach a plateau in the elderly population [22]. Therefore, to eliminate the effect of age itself on iron levels between groups, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (with age as the covariate) was also used to assess T2 (and R2) differences. To investigate the relationship between T2 (and R2) values in the hippocampus and MMSE scores for the participants with AD, a Pearson’s correlation coefficient, adjusted for age, was used to assess the direction, strength, and significance of the correlations. All statistical computations and analyses were carried out using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS for Windows, version 13.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and the results were declared statistically significant when associated with a two-sided P < 0.05.

Results

Demographics, Clinical Data

There were no significant differences in age, sex and education levels (P > 0.05) between the age-matched elderly controls (N = 10) and the AD group (N = 10) (Table 1). The AD group had significantly lower MMSE score (P < 0.05, Table 1) in comparison to the control group.

Hippocampal T2 of normal adults and its relationship with age, gender and side

The hippocampal T2 values of both sides were (85.2±2.4) milliseconds (right hippocampus) and (85.3±2.5) milliseconds (left hippocampus), respectively, and there were no significant differences in hippocampal T2 values on the left and the right side of the same sex group of healthy volunteers (t = 0.62, P = 0.5383). There were no further significant gender-wise differences (P > 0.05). The bilateral hippocampal T2 values correlated moderately with age (r = -0.59 for right side and -0.58 for left side, respectively; P < 0.001) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Scatter plots of T2-values in bilateral hippocampus of normal controls at various ages.

Scatter plots illustrate T2 values on both sides of hippocampus correlated moderately with age in normal controls. The correlation coefficients are -0.59 and -0.58 for right side (A) and left side (B), respectively at P < 0.001.

Scatter plots of T2-values in bilateral hippocampus of normal controls at various ages.

Scatter plots illustrate T2 values on both sides of hippocampus correlated moderately with age in normal controls. The correlation coefficients are -0.59 and -0.58 for right side (A) and left side (B), respectively at P < 0.001.

T2 (and R2) differences between both groups

After ANCOVA adjustment for age, the AD group had significantly lower T2 values (61.7 ± 2.7 ms; t = -12.262, P < 0.001) and significantly higher R2 values (t = 9.121, P < 0.001) in the hippocampus, compared to controls (T2 values: 83.2 ± 2.8 ms).

T2 (and R2) correlations with neuropsychological test scores

After controlling for the age-related bias, Pearson’s correlation test revealed that the T2 values in the hippocampus had a strong positive correlation with the MMSE score (the coefficient of determination, denoted as R 2 = 0.97, P < 0.05), while the R2 values in the hippocampus had a strong negative correlation with the MMSE score (R 2 = 0.95, P < 0.05) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Scatter plot of T2 (or R2)-values of hippocampus vs. MMSE score.

Scatter plot shows the T2 (or R2)-values of the hippocampus and the MMSE score in AD patients were positively (or negatively) correlated with a coefficient of determination of 0.97 (or 0.95) (P < 0.05 for both) controlling for the age related bias.

Scatter plot of T2 (or R2)-values of hippocampus vs. MMSE score.

Scatter plot shows the T2 (or R2)-values of the hippocampus and the MMSE score in AD patients were positively (or negatively) correlated with a coefficient of determination of 0.97 (or 0.95) (P < 0.05 for both) controlling for the age related bias.

Discussion

R2 versus R2 ’ or R2 *

Many investigators [23-26] have proposed R2 *, the free induction decay rate due to the presence of magnetic field gradient irregularities and minor differences in chemical environment, and even R2’, the difference between R2 * and R2, to be a specific marker of tissue iron. At the same high field strength (3.0 T), Gelman et al [23] reported a strong correlation (r = 0.92) between R2 and postmortem iron concentrations. Those researchers [23-26], however, suggest R2 ’ or R2 * may be a more specific measure of iron in the brain as cortical white and gray matter regions with similar iron concentrations have similar R2 ’ or R2 * values, but significantly different R2 values. Other factors, such as the increased water content, may also contribute to changes in R2 values besides tissue iron concentrations. However, in the case of gray matter (e.g., hippocampus as ROIs in our study), where water concentrations are similar, iron appears to be the dominant factor in determining R2, and the iron-related specificity of R2 would, therefore, be enhanced. Hence, increase in R2 values of the gray matter are thought to reflect increase in the iron contents of this brain tissue type. The inferred R2 values from the measured data also vary depending on the inter-echo spacing and the field strength of MRI scanner being used in the experiment [27], which would account for slightly different results reported in the literature.

Comparison of T2 (and R2) values between AD patients and age-matched controls

T2 (and R2) differences between the AD group and the healthy control group suggest iron concentration has increased in the hippocampal region and a disruption of iron homeostasis in the brain has happened in those with memory complaints, consistent with incipient AD pathogenesis and biochemical data. Excessive brain iron deposition would promote the aggregation of β-amyloid peptide and increase β-amyloid toxicity [11], and its neurotoxicity can, therefore, lead to nerve cell death. Previous histochemical stains reveal iron in amorphous amyloid plaques, in neurofibrillary tangles, and in cortical neurons in AD brains [28,29]. This may account for the severe encephalatrophy, especially in the hippocampus located in the temporal lobe of brain, observed from MR imaging in patients with AD. Haley et al [30] conducted a study of 10 patients with AD and 40 healthy participants, and found T2 values in the right hippocampus of AD patients to be significantly reduced compared to normal aged participants, which is consistent with the results of this study. Schenck et al [31] analyzed the differences in T2 relaxation times of hippocampus between patients with AD and normal controls using 3.0 T MRI, and argued that while iron accumulation in hippocampi of AD patients resulted in reduced T2 relaxation times, it may be partly offset by the prolongation of T2 relaxation times due to the increase of the free water content, and thereby, affecting the sensitivity of estimating iron level in the hippocampus by T2 values. The preliminary study of House et al [32] and the work of Campeau et al [33] indicated that hippocampal R2 values in the AD group were essentially unchanged compared to the controls. However, our results contradicted their findings. A 7 T MR imaging study by Huesgen et al [34] has also reported a non-significant reduction in T2 relaxation times (R2 increase) of AD hippocampus. They explained that AD progression accelerates the neuronal degeneration and the hippocampal atrophy. Atrophy of brain tissue may increase the amount of CSF, thus reducing R2 and counteracting any iron increases. The final R2 values, therefore, remain unchanged. It is interesting to note that some researchers [35-37] have reported R2 reductions in the hippocampus of AD patients. Nevertheless, the reported absence of an association between hippocampal volumes and T2 relaxation times in AD [34,38] suggests that the atrophy, resulting in increased water contents, is not the dominant mechanism driving R2 reduction in this brain region. The hippocampus is rich in myelin relative to other gray matter regions. A loss of myelin in AD hippocampi has been inferred from a decrease in 2’3’-cyclic nucleotide-3’-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) activity [39], which suggests a possible mechanism for reducing hippocampal R2 values in AD, and is analogous to the pathologic processes reducing R2 in white matter. Hence, demyelination and atrophy cause the hippocampal R2 values to decline. Wang et al [40] studied the animal model of AD in mice using histochemical staining for senile plaques and T2 mapping. They found that senile plaques were deposited as early as 4 months in transgenic mouse model of AD. Iron depositions in the hippocampus and the cortex were detected by Perl’s-DAB (stain for iron) as early as 6 months of age, and there was an overall increase in number and load of plaques and iron with age. They further found that T2 values decreased in the cortical and the hippocampal regions of adult mice group, and it tended to shorten with age. They [40] believed that shortening of T2 values in AD transgenic mouse may be associated with the interaction between Aβ peptide and iron. In the early days iron deposition was not as obvious as senile plaques. As a result, it reduced T2 values in AD transgenic mouse which may be related to a deposition of Aβ peptide. However, in the elder mice group, both Aβ and iron contributed, with iron taking a leading role, resulting in reduced T2 values. Their preclinical study established iron accumulation to be the dominant factor in the reduction of T2 value in AD.

Correlations of T2 (and R2) values with MMSE score

One of the most important findings in our measurement was a strongly positive correlation between the T2 relaxation times in the hippocampus and the MMSE score (R 2=0.97, P < 0.05) or a strongly negative correlation between the R2 and the MMSE score (R 2=0.95, P < 0.05) for the patients with AD. The results establish a connection between the iron deposition in the hippocampus and the severity of AD patients, and suggest that iron deposition relates to the pathology and the progression in AD. Such information may assist in the diagnosis of AD, as well as in yielding a clinical biomarker that would be valuable in the monitoring of AD. House et al [32] reported negative correlations in the gray matter and positive correlations in the white matter between R2 and cognition/memory scores, that is, in participants with memory problems, R2 tends to increase in gray matter and decrease in white matter. There are, however, some exceptions to these general trends. R2 in the internal capsule showed mainly weak negative correlations with MMSE score, perhaps reflecting the influence of interdigitating gray-matter bridges between the caudate and the putamen. R2 values in the left hippocampus were positively correlated weakly with some memory scores and the MMSE results. As discussed above, the high myelin content of the hippocampus relative to other gray matter regions could make this structure vulnerable to R2-reducing processes that are more pronounced in white matter, and which ultimately obscure correlations with memory scores. Laasko et al [35] found there was no correlation between T2 values and memory test scores in their AD patients, but found a significant negative correlation between the hippocampal T2 values and MMSE scores. This observation is equivalent to a positive correlation between R2-values and MMSE scores, which is contrary to our own findings. The work of Wang et al [37] mentioned that the right hippocampal T2 was correlated with cognitive performance in AD, whereas the amygdaloid T2 was not. They [37] argued that this might be partly explained by their study sample and the fact that most of the patients in their study had moderate dementia. They further argued these results could not conclude whether the measurement of amygdaloid T2 helps in monitoring the cognitive deterioration of AD. Their work motivated us to focus on the measurement in one specific region- hippocampus.

Limitations

There are two main limitations of our study. First of all, our study included limited number of AD patients. Further evaluation in larger samples is required, especially, more patients with mild cognitive impairment recruited in the following studies. Another limitation of this study is that only R2 values in the hippocampus were measured. Although AD is traditionally characterized as a gray matter disease, white matter changes were considered only a secondary phenomenon related to the neuronal degeneration. However, histopathological, biochemical, and MR imaging changes in AD white matter have been observed in several studies [41-44]. Some early research [42] indicated that white matter changes in AD were not purely a secondary phenomenon related to neuronal degeneration, while reports from the past few years [45,46] suggest that demyelination may have closer links to AD pathogenesis than previously thought. House et al [32,47] showed that R2-values and iron concentrations in various brain regions of AD patients were correlated, though hippocampal analysis was not included. Higher water content, associated with decreasing protein and lipid levels, can also contribute to R2 reduction in white matter of AD patient if iron concentration is fixed. This would explain that in normal cortical brain tissue, where gray and adjacent white matter have similar iron concentrations, the R2 of the gray matter is smaller than R2 of the white matter [48,49], and would account for variance in R2-values reported in various AD research studies.

Conclusions

Patients with AD showed significantly lower T2 values suggesting increased iron depositions in the hippocampus. In addition, R2 values from hippocampus in AD showed opposite correlation with cognition scores. Therefore, quantitative R2 measurements in the hippocampus might offer useful means for the early diagnosis and the monitoring of AD, and provide an indication of the treatment response.
  47 in total

1.  Prolongation of T(2) relaxation times of hippocampus and amygdala in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Huali Wang; Huishu Yuan; Liang Shu; Jingxia Xie; Dai Zhang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging markers of Parkinson's disease nigrostriatal signature.

Authors:  Patrice Péran; Andrea Cherubini; Francesca Assogna; Fabrizio Piras; Carlo Quattrocchi; Antonella Peppe; Pierre Celsis; Olivier Rascol; Jean-François Démonet; Alessandro Stefani; Mariangela Pierantozzi; Francesco Ernesto Pontieri; Carlo Caltagirone; Gianfranco Spalletta; Umberto Sabatini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Myelin water imaging: Implementation and development at 3.0T and comparison to 1.5T measurements.

Authors:  Shannon H Kolind; Burkhard Mädler; Stefan Fischer; David K B Li; Alex L MacKay
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Human brain iron mapping using atlas-based T2 relaxometry.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Indika S Walimuni; Larry A Kramer; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Prolongation of magnetic resonance T2 time in hippocampus of human patients marks the presence and severity of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  S J Kirsch; R W Jacobs; L L Butcher; J Beatty
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1992-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Correlation of proton transverse relaxation rates (R2) with iron concentrations in postmortem brain tissue from alzheimer's disease patients.

Authors:  Michael J House; Timothy G St Pierre; Kris V Kowdley; Thomas Montine; James Connor; John Beard; Jose Berger; Narendra Siddaiah; Eric Shankland; Lee-Way Jin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Nanoparticle and other metal chelation therapeutics in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Matthew R Garrett; Ping Men; Xiongwei Zhu; George Perry; Mark A Smith
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2005-09-25

8.  Glial levels determine severity of white matter disease in Alzheimer's disease: a neuropathological study of glial changes.

Authors:  M Sjöbeck; E Englund
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.090

9.  Transferrin and iron in normal, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease brain regions.

Authors:  D A Loeffler; J R Connor; P L Juneau; B S Snyder; L Kanaley; A J DeMaggio; H Nguyen; C M Brickman; P A LeWitt
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  Aging of subcortical nuclei: microstructural, mineralization and atrophy modifications measured in vivo using MRI.

Authors:  Andrea Cherubini; Patrice Péran; Carlo Caltagirone; Umberto Sabatini; Gianfranco Spalletta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Donovan A McGrowder; Fabian Miller; Kurt Vaz; Chukwuemeka Nwokocha; Cameil Wilson-Clarke; Melisa Anderson-Cross; Jabari Brown; Lennox Anderson-Jackson; Lowen Williams; Lyndon Latore; Rory Thompson; Ruby Alexander-Lindo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 2.  Treating Alzheimer's disease by targeting iron.

Authors:  Sara Nikseresht; Ashley I Bush; Scott Ayton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Effects of lipoic acid supplementation on age- and iron-induced memory impairment, mitochondrial DNA damage and antioxidant responses.

Authors:  Patrícia Molz; Betânia Souza de Freitas; Vanise Hallas Uberti; Kesiane Mayra da Costa; Luiza Wilges Kist; Maurício Reis Bogo; Nadja Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Ex vivo MRI transverse relaxation in community based older persons with and without Alzheimer's dementia.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Robert J Dawe; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Julie A Schneider; Konstantinos Arfanakis; David A Bennett
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Potential clinical impact of multiparametric quantitative MR spectroscopy in neurological disorders: A review and analysis.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Appraising the Role of Iron in Brain Aging and Cognition: Promises and Limitations of MRI Methods.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Iron Overload Impairs Autophagy: Effects of Rapamycin in Ameliorating Iron-Related Memory Deficits.

Authors:  Vanise Hallas Uberti; Betânia Souza de Freitas; Patrícia Molz; Elke Bromberg; Nadja Schröder
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  T2 Relaxometry and Diffusion Tensor Indices of the Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex Improve Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI to Detect Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.

Authors:  Michael J Knight; Alfie Wearn; Elizabeth Coulthard; Risto A Kauppinen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Iron and Ferroptosis as Therapeutic Targets in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Gleason; Ashley I Bush
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Three-dimensional whole-brain simultaneous T1, T2, and T1ρ quantification using MR Multitasking: Method and initial clinical experience in tissue characterization of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sen Ma; Nan Wang; Zhaoyang Fan; Marwa Kaisey; Nancy L Sicotte; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.