Michael J Knight1, Alfie Wearn2,3, Elizabeth Coulthard2,3, Risto A Kauppinen1. 1. School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. 2. Bristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom. 3. School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantitative T2 and diffusion MRI indices inform about tissue state and microstructure, both of which may be affected by pathology before tissue atrophy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the capability of both volumetric and quantitative MRI (qMRI) of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (EC) for classification of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cross-sectional study. POPULATION: Consecutive cohorts of healthy age-matched controls (n = 62), aMCI patients (n = 25), and ADD patients (n = 14). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T using T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, T2 relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). ASSESSMENT: Montreal Cognitive Assessment and paired associate learning tests for cognitive state. Hippocampal subfield volumes by the automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields system from structural brain images. T2 relaxation time and DTI indices quantified for hippocampal subfields. The fraction of voxels with high T2 values (>20 ms above subfield median) was calculated and regionalized for hippocampus and EC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Support vector machine and receiver operating characteristic analyses from cognitive and MRI data. RESULTS: qMRI classified aMCI and ADD with excellent sensitivity (79.0% and 94.5%, respectively) and specificity (85.6% and 86.1%, respectively), superior to volumes alone (70.0% and 84.5% for respective sensitivities; 82.2 and 91.1 for respective specificities) and similar to cognitive tests (61.7% and 87.5% for respective sensitivities; 88.2% and 90.7% for respective specificities). Regions of high T2 are dispersed throughout each hippocampal subfield in aMCI and ADD with higher concentration than controls, and was most pronounced in the EC. No other individual qMRI marker than EC volume can separate aMCI from ADD, however. DATA CONCLUSION: qMRI markers of hippocampal and entorhinal tissue states are sensitive and specific classifiers of aMCI and ADD. They may serve as markers of a neurodegenerative state preceding volume loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:445-455.
BACKGROUND: Quantitative T2 and diffusion MRI indices inform about tissue state and microstructure, both of which may be affected by pathology before tissue atrophy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the capability of both volumetric and quantitative MRI (qMRI) of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (EC) for classification of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cross-sectional study. POPULATION: Consecutive cohorts of healthy age-matched controls (n = 62), aMCI patients (n = 25), and ADD patients (n = 14). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T using T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, T2 relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). ASSESSMENT: Montreal Cognitive Assessment and paired associate learning tests for cognitive state. Hippocampal subfield volumes by the automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields system from structural brain images. T2 relaxation time and DTI indices quantified for hippocampal subfields. The fraction of voxels with high T2 values (>20 ms above subfield median) was calculated and regionalized for hippocampus and EC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Support vector machine and receiver operating characteristic analyses from cognitive and MRI data. RESULTS: qMRI classified aMCI and ADD with excellent sensitivity (79.0% and 94.5%, respectively) and specificity (85.6% and 86.1%, respectively), superior to volumes alone (70.0% and 84.5% for respective sensitivities; 82.2 and 91.1 for respective specificities) and similar to cognitive tests (61.7% and 87.5% for respective sensitivities; 88.2% and 90.7% for respective specificities). Regions of high T2 are dispersed throughout each hippocampal subfield in aMCI and ADD with higher concentration than controls, and was most pronounced in the EC. No other individual qMRI marker than EC volume can separate aMCI from ADD, however. DATA CONCLUSION: qMRI markers of hippocampal and entorhinal tissue states are sensitive and specific classifiers of aMCI and ADD. They may serve as markers of a neurodegenerative state preceding volume loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:445-455.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; John B Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Long Xie; Song-Lin Ding; Eske C Gertje; Lauren Mancuso; Daria Kliot; Sandhitsu R Das; David A Wolk Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: A Pitkänen; M Laakso; R Kälviäinen; K Partanen; P Vainio; M Lehtovirta; P Riekkinen; H Soininen Journal: Neurology Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Usman A Khan; Li Liu; Frank A Provenzano; Diego E Berman; Caterina P Profaci; Richard Sloan; Richard Mayeux; Karen E Duff; Scott A Small Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2013-12-22 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: F Palesi; P Vitali; P Chiarati; G Castellazzi; E Caverzasi; A Pichiecchio; E Colli-Tibaldi; F D'Amore; I D'Errico; E Sinforiani; S Bastianello Journal: Neurol Res Int Date: 2011-06-12
Authors: Jason F Moody; Nakul Aggarwal; Douglas C Dean; Do P M Tromp; Steve R Kecskemeti; Jonathan A Oler; Ned H Kalin; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Francesca Del Signore; Massimo Vignoli; Leonardo Della Salda; Roberto Tamburro; Andrea Paolini; Ilaria Cerasoli; Matteo Chincarini; Emanuela Rossi; Nicola Ferri; Mariarita Romanucci; Ilaria Falerno; Francesco de Pasquale Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Jilu P Mole; Fabrizio Fasano; John Evans; Rebecca Sims; Emma Kidd; John P Aggleton; Claudia Metzler-Baddeley Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Miguel A Chávez-Fumagalli; Pallavi Shrivastava; Jorge A Aguilar-Pineda; Rita Nieto-Montesinos; Gonzalo Davila Del-Carpio; Antero Peralta-Mestas; Claudia Caracela-Zeballos; Guillermo Valdez-Lazo; Victor Fernandez-Macedo; Alejandro Pino-Figueroa; Karin J Vera-Lopez; Christian L Lino Cardenas Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Rep Date: 2021-01-11
Authors: Bethany M Coad; Parisa A Ghomroudi; Rebecca Sims; John P Aggleton; Seralynne D Vann; Claudia Metzler-Baddeley Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 5.133
Authors: Alfie R Wearn; Volkan Nurdal; Esther Saunders-Jennings; Michael J Knight; Hanna K Isotalus; Serena Dillon; Demitra Tsivos; Risto A Kauppinen; Elizabeth J Coulthard Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Alfie R Wearn; Esther Saunders-Jennings; Volkan Nurdal; Emma Hadley; Michael J Knight; Margaret Newson; Risto A Kauppinen; Elizabeth J Coulthard Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 6.982