Literature DB >> 24096127

Test-retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI.

Colin R Buchanan1, Cyril R Pernet2, Krzysztof J Gorgolewski3, Amos J Storkey4, Mark E Bastin5.   

Abstract

Structural brain networks constructed from diffusion MRI (dMRI) and tractography have been demonstrated in healthy volunteers and more recently in various disorders affecting brain connectivity. However, few studies have addressed the reproducibility of the resulting networks. We measured the test-retest properties of such networks by varying several factors affecting network construction using ten healthy volunteers who underwent a dMRI protocol at 1.5T on two separate occasions. Each T1-weighted brain was parcellated into 84 regions-of-interest and network connections were identified using dMRI and two alternative tractography algorithms, two alternative seeding strategies, a white matter waypoint constraint and three alternative network weightings. In each case, four common graph-theoretic measures were obtained. Network properties were assessed both node-wise and per network in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by comparing within- and between-subject differences. Our findings suggest that test-retest performance was improved when: 1) seeding from white matter, rather than grey; and 2) using probabilistic tractography with a two-fibre model and sufficient streamlines, rather than deterministic tensor tractography. In terms of network weighting, a measure of streamline density produced better test-retest performance than tract-averaged diffusion anisotropy, although it remains unclear which is a more accurate representation of the underlying connectivity. For the best performing configuration, the global within-subject differences were between 3.2% and 11.9% with ICCs between 0.62 and 0.76. The mean nodal within-subject differences were between 5.2% and 24.2% with mean ICCs between 0.46 and 0.62. For 83.3% (70/84) of nodes, the within-subject differences were smaller than between-subject differences. Overall, these findings suggest that whilst current techniques produce networks capable of characterising the genuine between-subject differences in connectivity, future work must be undertaken to improve network reliability.
© 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Connectome; Diffusion MRI; Human brain; Network; Test–retest; Tractography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24096127     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

1.  A Dissociation in Effects of Risperidone Monotherapy on Functional and Anatomical Connectivity Within the Default Mode Network.

Authors:  Xiaofen Zong; Maolin Hu; Spiro P Pantazatos; J John Mann; Gaohua Wang; Yanhui Liao; Zhong-Chun Liu; Wei Liao; Tao Yao; Zongchang Li; Ying He; Luxian Lv; Deen Sang; Jinsong Tang; Huafu Chen; Junjie Zheng; Xiaogang Chen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Reproducibility of graph-theoretic brain network metrics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Welton; Daniel A Kent; Dorothee P Auer; Robert A Dineen
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2015-01-09

3.  Convergence and divergence across construction methods for human brain white matter networks: an assessment based on individual differences.

Authors:  Suyu Zhong; Yong He; Gaolang Gong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Navigating the link between processing speed and network communication in the human brain.

Authors:  Govinda Poudel; Karen Caeyenberghs; Phoebe Imms; Juan F Domínguez D; Alex Burmester; Caio Seguin; Adam Clemente; Thijs Dhollander; Peter H Wilson
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Psychoradiological patterns of small-world properties and a systematic review of connectome studies of patients with 6 major psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Xueling Suo; Du Lei; Lei Li; Wenbin Li; Jing Dai; Song Wang; Manxi He; Hongyan Zhu; Graham J Kemp; Qiyong Gong
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Multimodal neuroimaging study reveals dissociable processes between structural and functional networks in patients with subacute intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Xiaobing Zhang; Xuebin Yu; Qingquan Bao; Liming Yang; Yu Sun; Peng Qi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Altered whole-brain connectivity in albinism.

Authors:  Thomas Welton; Sarim Ather; Frank A Proudlock; Irene Gottlob; Robert A Dineen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A COMPARISON OF NETWORK DEFINITIONS FOR DETECTING SEX DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN CONNECTIVITY USING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES.

Authors:  George W Hafzalla; Anjanibhargavi Ragothaman; Joshua Faskowitz; Neda Jahanshad; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Margaret J Wright; Meredith N Braskie; Gautam Prasad; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2017-06-19

9.  The open diffusion data derivatives, brain data upcycling via integrated publishing of derivatives and reproducible open cloud services.

Authors:  Paolo Avesani; Brent McPherson; Soichi Hayashi; Cesar F Caiafa; Robert Henschel; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; Lindsey Kitchell; Daniel Bullock; Andrew Patterson; Emanuele Olivetti; Olaf Sporns; Andrew J Saykin; Lei Wang; Ivo Dinov; David Hancock; Bradley Caron; Yiming Qian; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.444

Review 10.  Diffusion MRI and its Role in Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Bryon A Mueller; Kelvin O Lim; Laura Hemmy; Jazmin Camchong
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.