| Literature DB >> 24093629 |
Nerea Larrañaga1, Rosa E Mejía, José I Hormaza, Alberto Montoya, Aida Soto, Gustavo A Fontecha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Caribbean coast of Central America remains an area of malaria transmission caused by Plasmodium falciparum despite the fact that morbidity has been reduced in recent years. Parasite populations in that region show interesting characteristics such as chloroquine susceptibility and low mortality rates. Genetic structure and diversity of P. falciparum populations in the Honduras-Nicaragua border were analysed in this study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24093629 PMCID: PMC3851272 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Partial map of Central America showing collection sites of samples infected by Municipalities have been coloured with different shades to indicate the proportion of samples collected in each location. Dot lines indicate approximate Moskitia region limits.
Allelic frequencies at seven microsatellite loci
| TA1 | 141 | 61 | 0.79 | 19 | 0.58 |
| | 144 | 11 | 0.14 | - | - |
| | 147 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.03 |
| | 169 | - | - | 13 | 0.39 |
| | 190 | 3 | 0.04 | - | - |
| | MD | 1 | 0.01 | - | - |
| POLY- α | 141 | 3 | 0.04 | 13 | 0.39 |
| | 169 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - |
| | 173 | 6 | 0.08 | - | - |
| | 179 | 66 | 0.86 | 20 | 0.61 |
| | 181 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - |
| PFPK2 | 131 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - |
| | 162 | 24 | 0.31 | 3 | 0.09 |
| | 189 | 7 | 0.09 | 12 | 0.36 |
| | 195 | 45 | 0.58 | 17 | 0.52 |
| | MD | - | - | 1 | 0.03 |
| TA109 | 189 | 49 | 0.64 | 24 | 0.73 |
| | 201 | 25 | 0.32 | 8 | 0.24 |
| | MD | 3 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.03 |
| 2490 | 80 | 2 | 0.03 | - | - |
| | 83 | 74 | 0.96 | 33 | 1 |
| C2M34 | 225 | 55 | 0.71 | 27 | 0.76 |
| 227 | 9 | 0.12 | - | - | |
| | MD | 13 | 0.17 | 6 | 0.08 |
| C3M69 | 125 | 20 | 0.26 | 9 | 0.27 |
| | 137 | 8 | 0.10 | 1 | 0.03 |
| | 139 | 44 | 0.57 | 9 | 0.27 |
| | 141 | - | - | 13 | 0.40 |
| MD | 5 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.03 |
MD = missing data.
Allelic diversity at seven microsatellite loci of in Honduras and Nicaragua
| TA1 | 4 (3.52) | 3 (2.97) | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.43 (0.14) | 0.44 |
| POLY-A | 5 (4.08) | 2 (2) | 0.26 | 0.49 | 0.38 (0.16) | 0.37 |
| PFPK2 | 4 (3.58) | 3 (3) | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.57 (0.02) | 0.59 |
| TA109 | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.42 (0.05) | 0.43 |
| 2490 | 2 (1.83) | 1 (1) | 0.05 | 0 | 0.03 (0.04) | 0.04 |
| C2M34 | 2 (2) | 1 (1) | 0.25 | 0 | 0.12 (0.17) | 0.18 |
| C3M69 | 3 (3) | 4 (3.98) | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.62 (0.11) | 0.65 |
*A = Numbers of different alleles within each population.
** RS = allelic richness.
Figure 2Bayesian clustering of 110 isolates assigned to K populations based on seven SSR markers. Each bar represents the proportion of each haplotype with ancestry in the defined clusters, each cluster being indicated by a different colour. OG: outgroup of reference clones parasites with an African origin.
Haplotypes frequency estimation of in Honduras and Nicaragua
| I | 22 | 0.29 | 9 | 0.27 |
| II | 2 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| III | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.03 |
| IV | 2 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| V | 6 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 |
| VI | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| VII | 7 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.03 |
| VIII | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| IX | 5 | 0.06 | 6 | 0.18 |
| X | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XI | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XII | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XIII | 5 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 |
| XIV | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XV | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XVI | 7 | 0.09 | 2 | 0.06 |
| XVII | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XVIII | 6 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 |
| XIX | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XX | 2 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| XXI | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XXII | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| XXIII | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.03 |
| XXIV | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.03 |
| XXV | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.36 |
Figure 3Haplotype distribution by geographic region. Less common haplotypes are shaded in grey. Circle sizes indicate the number of isolates collected in those communities.
Figure 4UPGMA dendrogram showing the relationships between isolates and a putative population structure. Isolates are coloured according to geographic location in the dendrogram.
Linkage desequilibrium analysis for each population
| Honduras and Nicaragua | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.1051 | 0.008 | - | - |
| Honduras | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.0483 | 0.012 | 34 | 0.072 |
| Nicaragua | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.2623 | 0.009 | 13 | 0.088 |
VD = variance; Ve = expected variance if linkage equilibrium exist; = Standardized Index of Association; Var(VD) = null hypothesis; VD = Ve.