Literature DB >> 20056638

Accuracy of self-reported reason for colorectal cancer testing.

Jan M Eberth1, Sally W Vernon, Arica White, Peter N Abotchie, Sharon P Coan.   

Abstract

Assessment of accuracy of self-reported reason for colorectal cancer testing has been limited. We examined the accuracy and correlates of self-reported reason (screening or diagnosis) for having a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Patients who had received at least one sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy within the past 5 years were recruited from a large multispecialty clinic in Houston, TX, between 2005 and 2007. We calculated concordance, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity between self-reported reason and the medical record (gold standard). Logistic regression was performed to identify correlates of accurate self-report. Self-reported reason for testing was more accurate when the sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy was done for screening, rather than diagnosis. In the multivariable analysis for sigmoidoscopy, age was positively associated with accurately reporting reason for testing, whereas having two or more colorectal cancer tests during the study period (compared with only one test) was negatively associated with accuracy. In the multivariable analysis, none of the correlates was statistically associated with colonoscopy although a similar pattern was observed for number of tests. Determining the best way to identify those who have been tested for diagnosis, rather than screening, is an important next step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056638      PMCID: PMC2805466          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

1.  Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Helen Meissner; Carrie Klabunde; Barbara K Rimer; Dennis J Ahnen; Roshan Bastani; Margaret T Mandelson; Marion R Nadel; Sherri Sheinfeld-Gorin; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon; Marion R Nadel; Nancy Breen; Laura C Seeff; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Anna P Schenck; Carrie N Klabunde; Joan L Warren; Sharon Peacock; William W Davis; Sarah T Hawley; Michael Pignone; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Shariq Khoja; S Elizabeth McGregor; Robert J Hilsden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel W Vojvodic; Sharon Coan; Pamela M Diamond; Anthony Greisinger; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Joseph Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Adam A Powell; Diana J Burgess; Sally W Vernon; Krysten Halek; Joan M Griffin; Michelle van Ryn; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Testing for prostate and colorectal cancer: comparison of self-report and medical record audit.

Authors:  H Irene Hall; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Dennis D Tolsma; Kate Rardin; Trevor Thompson; Amber Hughes Sinclair; Diane J Madlon-Kay; Marion Nadel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Barriers of HIPAA regulation to implementation of health services research.

Authors:  Jay J Shen; Linda F Samson; Elmer L Washington; Phyllis Johnson; Constance Edwards; Amy Malone
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures.

Authors:  N P Gordon; R A Hiatt; D I Lampert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic variations in the effects of family history of colorectal cancer on screening compliance.

Authors:  Molly Perencevich; Rohit P Ojha; Ewout W Steyerberg; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Alex H Krist; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Resa M Jones; Rebecca R Lehman; Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Dominick L Frosch; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the United States: Correlates and Time Trends by Type of Test.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Ashwini V Soman; Zahava Berkowitz; Stacey A Fedewa; Susan A Sabatino; Janet S de Moor; Tainya C Clarke; V Paul Doria-Rose; Erica S Breslau; Ahmedin Jemal; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.090

4.  Why not? Understanding the spatial clustering of private facility-based delivery and financial reasons for homebirths in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kerry L M Wong; Emma Radovich; Onikepe O Owolabi; Oona M R Campbell; Oliver J Brady; Caroline A Lynch; Lenka Benova
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary Jane Esplen; Susan K Peterson; Christi A Patten; Jan Lowery; Frank A Sinicrope; Sandra K Nigon; Joyce Borgen; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Louise A Keogh; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.