Literature DB >> 15957002

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients.

Grégoire Moutel1, Nathalie Duchange, François Raffi, Lama I Sharara, Ioannis Théodorou, Violaine Noël, Sandrine de Montgolfier, Ingrid Callies, François Bricaire, Christian Hervé, Catherine Leport.   

Abstract

The aim of pharmacogenetic studies is to adapt therapeutic strategies to individual genetic profiles, thus maximising their efficacy and minimising the likelihood of adverse side effects. Since the advent of personalised medicine, the issue of communicating research results to participants has become increasingly important. We addressed this question in the context of HIV infection, as patients and associations are particularly concerned by research and therapeutic advances. We explored the standpoints of both research professionals and participants involved in a pharmacogenetic study conducted in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. The setting of the research protocol was followed over a 2-year period. Participants' standpoints were collected through a questionnaire and interviews were conducted with research professionals. Of 125 participants, 76% wished to receive individual results and 71% wished to receive collective results; 39% did not know when results might be expected. Communication of global research results is a principle that is generally accepted by professionals. Concerning individual feedback, the professionals felt that it was necessary if it could be of direct benefit to the participant, but they expressed doubts for situations with no recognised benefit. Our results highlight the necessity to consider this issue in greater detail. We suggest the need to anticipate the debates concerning individual feedback, to differentiate between situations and the importance of further investigations on the opportunities and modalities of communication. Finally, our work emphasised the opposite pressures between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the therapeutic orientation of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15957002      PMCID: PMC1868604          DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  30 in total

1.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics of antiretroviral therapy: genetic variation of response and toxicity.

Authors:  Annalise M Martin; David Nolan; Silvana Gaudieri; Elizabeth Phillips; Simon Mallal
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Pharmacogenetics, ethical issues: review of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report.

Authors:  O P Corrigan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation.

Authors:  Alison P Galvani; John Novembre
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 2.700

5.  Stored tissue samples: through the confidentiality maze.

Authors:  Y Joly; B M Knoppers; M T Nguyen
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Early protective effect of CCR-5 delta 32 heterozygosity on HIV-1 disease progression: relationship with viral load. The SEROCO Study Group.

Authors:  L Meyer; M Magierowska; J B Hubert; C Rouzioux; C Deveau; F Sanson; P Debre; J F Delfraissy; I Theodorou
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  [The genetics HIV cohort of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study--facing the new challenges in medicine].

Authors:  A Telenti; Hj Furrer
Journal:  Ther Umsch       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics of HIV.

Authors:  Oliver Ast; Wolfgang Lüke
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2004-06

9.  Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study.

Authors:  M Dean; M Carrington; C Winkler; G A Huttley; M W Smith; R Allikmets; J J Goedert; S P Buchbinder; E Vittinghoff; E Gomperts; S Donfield; D Vlahov; R Kaslow; A Saah; C Rinaldo; R Detels; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Predisposition to abacavir hypersensitivity conferred by HLA-B*5701 and a haplotypic Hsp70-Hom variant.

Authors:  Annalise M Martin; David Nolan; Silvana Gaudieri; Coral Ann Almeida; Richard Nolan; Ian James; Filipa Carvalho; Elizabeth Phillips; Frank T Christiansen; Anthony W Purcell; James McCluskey; Simon Mallal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  13 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.

Authors:  Kyle Bertram Brothers
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

5.  Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.

Authors:  N Arar; J Seo; S Lee; H E Abboud; L A Copeland; P Noel; M Parchman
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project.

Authors:  Sylviane Darquy; Grégoire Moutel; Anne-Sophie Lapointe; Diane D'Audiffret; Julie Champagnat; Samia Guerroui; Marie-Louise Vendeville; Odile Boespflug-Tanguy; Nathalie Duchange
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feedback of research findings for vaccine trials: experiences from two malaria vaccine trials involving healthy children on the Kenyan Coast.

Authors:  Caroline Gikonyo; Dorcas Kamuya; Bibi Mbete; Patricia Njuguna; Ally Olotu; Philip Bejon; Vicki Marsh; Sassy Molyneux
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.294

9.  Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary Jane Esplen; Susan K Peterson; Christi A Patten; Jan Lowery; Frank A Sinicrope; Sandra K Nigon; Joyce Borgen; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Louise A Keogh; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Acceptability of Pharmacogenetic Testing among French Psychiatrists, a National Survey.

Authors:  Benjamin Laplace; Benjamin Calvet; Aurelie Lacroix; Stephane Mouchabac; Nicolas Picard; Murielle Girard; Eric Charles
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.