Literature DB >> 24089140

Overexpressing sonic hedgehog peptide restores periosteal bone formation in a murine bone allograft transplantation model.

Chunlan Huang1, Minghui Tang1, Eric Yehling1, Xinping Zhang2.   

Abstract

Although activation of hedgehog (Hh) signaling has been shown to induce osteogenic differentiation in vitro and bone formation in vivo, the underlying mechanisms and the potential use of Hh-activated mesenchymal progenitors in bone defect repair remain elusive. In this study, we demonstrated that implantation of periosteal-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (PDMPCs) that overexpressed an N-terminal sonic hedgehog peptide (ShhN) via an adenoviral vector (Ad-ShhN) restored periosteal bone collar formation in a 4-mm segmental bone allograft model in immunodeficient mice. Ad-ShhN enhanced donor cell survival and microvessel formation in collagen scaffold at 2 weeks after surgery and induced donor cell-dependent bone formation at 6 weeks after surgery. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis further showed that Ad-ShhN-PDMPC-seeded scaffold contained a twofold more CD45(-)Sca-1(+)CD34(+)VEGFR2(+) endothelial progenitors than Ad-LacZ-PDMPC-seeded scaffold at day 7 after surgery. Ad-ShhN-transduced PDMPCs induced a 1.8-fold more CD31(+) microvessel formation than Ad-LacZ-transduced PDMPCs in a coculture of endothelial progenitors and PDMPCs. Taken together, our data show that overexpression of ShhN in mesenchymal progenitors improves bone defect reconstruction by enhancing donor progenitor cell survival, differentiation, and scaffold revascularization at the site of compromised periosteum. Hh agonist-based therapy, therefore, merits further investigation in tissue engineering-based applications aimed at enhancing bone defect repair and reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24089140      PMCID: PMC3916037          DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


Introduction

Repair and reconstruction of large bone defects remain a challenging clinical problem. Current management of bone defect repair often involves the use of bone graft materials. Each year more than 500,000 bone graft procedures are performed in the United States, and more than 2.2 million are performed annually worldwide.[1] Although an autograft is considered as the “gold standard,” the use of an autograft is limited due to its associated donor site morbidity and the restricted availability for large bone defect repair. Compared with autografts, allografts are often available in desired size, shape, and quantity. Cortical bone allografts further provide immediate support for structural bone defect reconstruction. However, due to the absence of osteogenic cells, bone allografts are inferior in new bone induction and revascularization. A 10-year failure rate of cortical allograft transplantations is reported at 60% due to nonunions, infection, and propagation of microdamages in devitalized bone.[2,3] A novel approach to revitalize structural bone allografts has been proposed.[4] The approach centers on engraftment of bone-forming cells around bone allografts, mimicking periosteal response in autograft repair.[5,6,7,8,9] The key to the success of this approach is to create a tissue-engineered periosteum replacement carrying osteogenic and angiogenic signals capable of recapitulating the effective repair elicited by periosteum. To the end of identifying critical osteogenic and angiogenic signals underlying periosteum-initiated repair and reconstruction, we recently isolated a population of mesenchymal progenitor cells from the healing autograft periosteum (PDMPCs). These cells express typical MPC markers such as Sca-1, SSEA4, CD105, and CD140b. They can further give rise to multiple cell types, such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes in vitro. Examination of the osteogenic differentiation of these cells shows that activation of Hh pathway leads to marked induction of osteoblasts in vitro and copious bone formation in vivo. Using a loss-of-function approach to delete the receptor of all Hh ligands, smoothened-1, we further show that Hh activation is required for effective periosteum-dependent bone graft repair and reconstruction.[10] As a family of key morphogens in embryonic development, hedgehogs, such as Indian hedgehog (Ihh) and Sonic hedgehog (Shh), are known to play key roles in skeletal formation and osteoblast development.[11] Both Ihh and Shh have been shown to induce osteogenic differentiation of MPC lines through induction of RUNX2, an essential transcriptional factor for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.[12] In addition to bone formation, the hedgehog pathway has also been intimately linked to vascular formation and angiogenesis.[13] Ihh is implicated in blood island formation and early yolk sac angiogenesis,[14] whereas Shh is critical for the assembly of angioblasts (endothelial precursors) into blood vessel network, a process known as vasculogenesis during embryonic development.[15,16] Hedgehog signaling is active in adult coronary vasculature, and disruption of Hh signaling led to loss of coronary blood vessels and subsequent cardiomyocyte cell death in mice.[17] The hedgehog signaling is induced during injury and in ischemic tissues. Delivery of Shh improves the repair of ischemic myocardium by promoting angiogenesis and microvascular remodeling.[18,19,20] The combined effects of hedgehog on osteogenesis and angiogenesis warrant further investigation for the use of Hh agonists in bone defect repair and reconstruction. To this end, we used an ex vivo hedgehog gene therapy approach and implanted PDMPCs that overexpressed an N-terminal peptide of human sonic hedgehog (ShhN) around a devitalized bone allograft via a collagen scaffold. The treated allograft was used to repair a 4-mm segmental defect created in the immunodeficient mouse femurs. Our results demonstrated that overexpression of ShhN in periosteal cells markedly enhanced donor cell survival and revascularization of the scaffold at the site of repair, leading to a complete restoration of periosteal bone formation around bone allografts.

Results

Implantation of ShhN-overexpressing PDMPCs restores periosteal bone collar formation around devitalized bone allografts

The effects of ShhN on osteogenic differentiation of PDMPCs were examined. Adenovirus-mediated gene transduction led to ~45,000-fold induction of human ShhN gene expression in PDMPCs (). Overexpression of ShhN markedly enhanced osteogenic differentiation of PDMPCs as evidenced by enhanced alkaline phosphatase staining () and increased expression of osteogenic genes such as RUNX2 and osteocalcin (,). Overexpression of ShhN further enhanced the level of RUNX2 protein in the western blot analyses (Supplementary Figure S1). In addition to the enhanced expression of osteogenic genes, a strong induction of angiogenic genes such as ANG1, ANG2, ANG4, and VEGF was also observed in cells transduced with Ad-ShhN (–). To enable tracking of the donor cells, PDMPCs were isolated from green fluorescence protein (GFP)–transgenic mice. Adenoviral transduced PDMPCs were loaded onto collagen scaffolds and wrapped around devitalized bone allografts in immunodeficient mice. Healing of the allografts treated with Ad-ShhN-PDMPCs or Ad-GFP-PDMPCs was examined. X-ray analyses showed limited bone callus formation at the host side of cortical bone junction in allografts treated with Ad-GFP-PDMPCs 6 weeks following implantation. By contrast, in allografts treated with Ad-ShhN-PDMPCs, a complete bridging callus was observed around the bone allograft (). MicroCT 3D reconstruction of the allograft at 6 weeks showed that the allograft engrafted with Shh-overexpressing PDMPCs formed a contiguous periosteal collar bone callus around allograft (, top panel). Quantitative volumetric analyses showed a 4.6-, 2.5, and 3.5-fold increase of new bone formation at the donor site, the host site, and the total callus, respectively, in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts as compared with the control Ad-GFP-PDMPC–treated allografts (; P < 0.05; n = 6). Histologic analyses showed that Ad-GFP-PDMPC–treated allograft had minimal periosteal bone formation at the donor site, with persistent collagen scaffold around allograft (, *indicates scaffold). By contrast, Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allograft formed a contiguous bone callus across the entire length of the donor bone (, indicated by arrows). The scaffold was largely absorbed and the callus was reconstituted with bone marrow. Histomorphometric analyses at 6 weeks showed a 4.6-fold increase in bone formation and a 3.5-fold decrease in fibrotic tissue at the donor site (; P < 0.05; n = 6). In the host side callus, bone formation was increased by 35% and fibrotic issue was reduced by 63% in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts (; P < 0.05; n = 6). Persistent cartilage observed at the cortical bone junction in the control allografts was completely eliminated in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts (,; P < 0.05; n = 6).

ShhN overexpression promotes neovascularization, enhanced donor cell survival, and donor cell–dependent bone formation

GFP+ donor cells were tracked at the repair sites for a period of 6 weeks using immunohistochemistry. In Ad-GFP-PDMPC–treated allografts, only a small number of donor progenitor cells were detected in collagen scaffold at 2 weeks (,,,). Most of the cells were found at the cortical bone junction or close to the surface of the scaffold (,). A few of the donor cells were incorporated into bone and cartilage tissues at the cortical bone junction (,, arrow in i). Sparsely distributed cells were found in the scaffold further away from the junction (). By contrast, in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts, abundant GFP+ cells were found throughout the collagen scaffold at 2 weeks after surgery (,,,). At a higher magnification, dense GFP+ cellular layers were observed in the scaffold (). By 6 weeks, abundant GFP+ cells were found to be incorporated into the new bone matrix at the donor site (,). At a higher magnification, GFP+ osteocytes and osteoblasts were readily identified along new bone surface and within bone matrix in the periosteal callus (, arrows). By contrast, in Ad-GFP-PDMPC–treated allografts (,,,), GFP+ cells were found scattered within the scaffold at the donor site (). A few of them were found embedded within poorly differentiated cartilage tissue (, arrow). At a higher magnification, the majority of GFP+ cells in the collagen scaffold were seen as undifferentiated elongated fibroblastic cells (). No GFP+ osteoblasts or osteocytes were identified in the densely packed scaffold. Microvessel formation within the collagen scaffold was examined. Immunohistochemical staining of CD31 demonstrated a marked increase in CD31+ microvessel formation in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–seeded scaffold as compared with the control Ad-GFP-PDMPC–seeded scaffold at 2 weeks after implantation (, vs. ,). Many of the vessels found in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold had larger, more mature lumens containing red blood cells (, arrows). Quantification of the numbers of microvessels within the scaffold showed a threefold increase in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold as compared with the control (; P < 0.05; n = 4). With enhanced vascularity, TRAP+ cells were also found to be increased within collagen scaffold (,). Quantification analyses showed a 10-fold increase in the number of TRAP+ cells in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold as compared with the control (; P < 0.05; n = 4).

ShhN overexpression enhances revascularization of collagen scaffold through promotion of the morphogenesis of endothelial progenitors from the peripheral tissues, such as skeletal muscles and fat

The rapid induction of microvessel formation in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold prompted us to investigate the potential effects of ShhN on recruitment and morphogenesis of endothelial progenitors from the surrounding tissues of periosteum, such as skeletal muscles or subcutaneous fat. It has been shown that both tissues contained abundant endothelial progenitors.[21,22] To determine whether ShhN could recruit more endothelial progenitors into the scaffold and further enhanced the assembly of microvessels, we first characterized different fractions of mononuclear cells isolated from muscle and fat using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Culturing of different fractions of the mononuclear cells from muscle and fat in Matrigel showed that CD45Sca-1+CD34+ and CD45Sca-1+CD34+VEGFR2+ cells were capable of forming abundant and robust CD31+ microvessels in vitro (Supplementary Figure S3 and ,). FACS analyses showed that muscle and fat contained an average of 7.7 and 5.8% CD45Sca-1+CD34+VEGFR2+ endothelial progenitors, respectively, in the mononuclear cell preps (,, arrows). In comparison, fewer CD45Sca-1+CD34+VEGFR2+ cells were identified in bone marrow (Supplementary Figure S2). Next we examined the frequency of CD45Sca-1+CD34+VEGFR2+ endothelial progenitor cells in Ad-LacZ-PDMPC– or Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–seeded collagen scaffold at day 7 following surgical implantation. FACS analyses show that Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold contained a 2.4-, 1.8-, and 2.1-fold more CD45CD34+VEGFR2+, CD45Sca-1+VEGFR2+, or CD45Sca-1+CD34+VEGFR2+ endothelial progenitors than Ad-LacZ-PDMPC scaffold (,; P < 0.05; n = 3). To determine whether ShhN overexpression could affect the differentiation and morphogenesis of the endothelial progenitors from the peripheral tissues, we cocultured CD45Sca-1+CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells with Ad-ShhN-PDMPCs. Our data showed that Ad-ShhN–transduced PDMPCs significantly increased CD31+ microvessel formation by 1.8-fold as compared with the control Ad-LacZ-PMDPCs (; n = 4; P < 0.05). Compared with the controls, Ad-ShhN–transduced cells visibly induced the formation of more microvessel branches with more complex morphology and network in vitro (,).

Discussion

To exploit the use of hedgehog agonist as an osteogenic and angiogenic agent for bone defect repair and reconstruction, in this study, we used an ex vivo gene therapy approach overexpressing an N-terminal peptide of human Shh in PDMPCs. To determine the efficacy of progenitor cell-based gene therapy, an immune-deficient mouse model was used to test the effects of ShhN on donor and host cells. Ad-GFP-PDMPC–treated devitalized allografts showed absence of periosteal bone formation and poor osseointegration at the cortical bone junctions, similar to allograft transplantation in immunocompetent mice.[5,6,23] By contrast, Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts completely restored periosteal collar bone formation and markedly improved osseointegration of the allografted bone. Further analyses showed that ShhN significantly enhanced donor cell survival and donor cell–dependent bone formation at the site of repair. ShhN additionally promoted the recruitment and morphogenesis of peripheral endothelial progenitors, leading to rapid revascularization of the cellular scaffold. Hedgehog pathway is essential for long bone development and perichondral collar bone formation.[24,25] Our previous study further shows that Hedgehog pathway is required for postnatal long bone defect healing that implicates periosteum.[10] By implantation of PDMPCs overexpressing ShhN in a bone allograft model, here we provide further evidence to show that activation of Hh pathway in MPCs effectively enhances long bone defect repair and reconstruction. By tracking the donor cell fate for a period of 6 weeks, we demonstrated that ShhN markedly enhanced donor cell survival, repopulation, and differentiation in the scaffold. Without ShhN stimulation, only a few PDMPCs survived in the scaffold, with a small proportion of the cells incorporated into cartilage or bone at the cortical bone junction. The majority of the donor PDMPCs remained as undifferentiated fibroblastic cells in the scaffold at 6 weeks after implantation. By contrast, ShhN-transduced PDMPCs exhibited better survival capability and quickly repopulated the scaffold, with a large number of cells differentiating into osteoblasts and participating in collar bone formation at the donor site (). In addition to the direct effects on donor cells, our data also showed that Ad-ShhN-PDMPC treatment enhanced host bone callus formation, suggesting a paracrine effect of ShhN on host progenitor cells. In the allografts treated with control PDMPC, persistent cartilaginous tissue was observed at the cortical bone junction 6 weeks after surgery (). By contrast, the persistent cartilaginous tissue was eliminated from the host and donor callus in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts, indicating an improved endochondral bone formation at the cortical bone junction. As a result of the elimination of the residue cartilage, Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts demonstrated better osseointegration at the cortical bone junction. Indeed, due to the lack of a cholesterol-binding site, ShhN peptide is shown to be able to diffuse to a greater distance than the native protein.[26] This unique property of ShhN favors postnatal repair, which is less dependent on a morphogen gradient. Similar to ShhN, a number of therapeutic genes, such as BMPs and VEGF, have been previously demonstrated to elicit both paracrine and autocrine effects on repair of large bone defect.[6,27,28] Besides enhancing cellular survival and differentiation, our data further showed that Hh overexpression induced rapid revascularization of the scaffold at the site of repair. The enhanced neovascularization is associated with the induction of several key angiogenic gene expression, such as VEGF, ANG1, ANG2, and ANG4 in PDMPCs (). VEGF signaling is linked with Hh pathways in vascular patterning.[16,29] In addition to VEGF, Hh signaling is also known to regulate both ANG1 and ANG2.[30,31] ANG1 promotes angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, whereas both ANG2 and ANG4 are classified as antagonists of ANG1-Tie2 signaling during development. However, despite an antagonizing role of ANG2 during development, recent data have shown that ANG2 is required for postnatal remodeling of the vessels.[32] ANG2 can further exert proangiogenic functions and enhance vessel sprouting in a Tie2-independent manner via activation of integrins/focal adhesion kinase signaling in endothelial tip cells.[33] The function of ANG4 is less well studied. Nevertheless, it is shown that ANG4 can induce angiogenesis in vivo in the mouse corneal micropocket assays.[34] Future experiments are needed to establish the role of angiopoietin genes in Hh-induced neovascularization. In addition to the induction of angiogenic factors by ShhN, our current data further suggest a novel mechanism that involves the recruitment of endothelial progenitors from the peripheral tissues such as fat and muscles. It has been shown that exogenous administration of Shh accelerates the repair of ischemic myocardium by enhancing the recruitment of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells to the injury site.[35] A similar mechanism is further noted in diabetic skin wound closure treated with Shh protein.[36] By comparing the frequency of endothelial progenitors from bone marrow, muscle, and fat, we found that bone marrow contained fewer endothelial progenitors than muscles and subcutaneous fat[22] (Supplementary Figure S2). By contrast, CD45CD34+Sca-1+VEGFR2+ cells constituted 5–10% of the isolated mononuclear cell populations in muscle and fat. The presence of abundant endothelial progenitors in surrounding soft tissues suggests the potential involvement of these cells in rapid vascularization of the scaffold. In support of this notion, we provided evidence to show that Ad-ShhN-PDMPC scaffold contained more CD45CD34+Sca-1+VEGFR2+ endothelial progenitor cells than Ad-LacZ-PDMPC scaffold at day 7 after transplantation (). Furthermore, ShhN overexpression significantly enhanced the formation and morphogenesis of CD31+ microvessels in coculture of CD45CD34+Sca-1+ endothelial progenitors with PDMPCs, demonstrating the advantage of using ShhN-transduced mesenchymal progenitors in revascularization of the scaffold. The data from this study are consistent with those from several recent reports that show a synergistic effect of Shh in vitro on osteogenesis and angiogenesis.[37,38] A marked increase of TRAP+ osteoclasts in Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–seeded collagen scaffold at 2 weeks postimplantation was also noticed (). ShhN overexpression has been shown to increase the OPG/RANKL ratio in bone marrow stromal cells.[39] In this study, we found that Ad-ShhN increased OPG/RANKL ratio by fivefold (data not shown), consistent with the probone formation effects of ShhN on PDMPCs. It has been shown that osteoclasts can be recruited to the scaffold in vivo and participate in the resorption of scaffold.[40] Hence, the increased number of TRAP+ osteoclasts in collagen scaffold is likely due to the increased neovascularization and enhanced calcification of Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–seeded scaffolds. The increased TRAP+ osteoclasts further contribute to the rapid resorption of the collagen scaffold. Periosteum has been shown to exhibit strong regenerative capacity in vitro and in vivo.[41,42] Ex vivo culture-expanded PDMPCs from human and animals have also been shown to enhance bone formation and bone defect repair.[43,44] However, culture-expanded mesenchymal progenitors often requires seeding on calcium containing scaffold, which could enhance osteogenic differentiation of the seeded cells.[45] Without calcium, one recent report shows that ex vivo expanded mesenchymal progenitors, regardless of their sources, have limited advantage in repair of critical bone defect.[46] It is worth noting that a noncalcium-containing collagen sponge was used as scaffold in this study. In these types of nonosteoinductive scaffold, we found only a modest contribution of PDMPCs to cartilage/bone formation at the cortical bone junction in the absence of ShhN, indicating that transplantation of culture-expanded periosteal MPCs alone is not sufficient to induce effective periosteal bone formation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that enhancing the survival and osteogenic differentiation of the donor MPCs and using an adequate osteoinductive scaffold are prerequisites for inducing sufficient bone formation for repair and reconstruction of large bone defects. In summary, we demonstrate that overexpression of hedgehog agonist ShhN in PDMPCs restores periosteal bone formation in bone allograft transplantation model. The induction of bone formation is donor cell dependent. ShhN further improves host bone formation and host-dependent vascular microenvironment by enhancing endothelial progenitor cell infiltration and rapid revascularization of the scaffold. This study therefore provides strong rationale for the use of Hh agonists in tissue-engineering applications to engender a periosteum replacement for enhanced bone defect repair and reconstruction. Further investigation using immunocompetent mice and large animal models will help in determining the translatability of this study to human.

Materials and Methods

C57BL/6, GFP transgenic mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). Immunocompromised mice (bg-nu/nu-xid) were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Frederick, MD). All surgical interventions were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Rochester. Adenoviruses encoding green fluorescence protein or N-terminal peptide of human Shh (Ad-ShhN) were purified as previously described.[10] Ad-LacZ was purchased from Vector Development Lab at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX). A segmental femoral bone allograft transplantation model, described previously,[5,6,23,47] was used to determine the effects of ShhN on bone repair and reconstruction. Briefly, a 10-week-old mouse was anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of Ketamine and Xylazine. A 4-mm mid-diaphyseal segment was removed from the femur of the donor mice using a sharp diamond-cutting wheel attached to a cordless dremel. A 4-mm devitalized bone allograft was inserted to repair a same sized segmental defect created in mid-diaphyseal region of the mouse femur. The transplanted allograft was stabilized by a 22G stainless pin placed through the intramedullary marrow cavity. All allografts were harvested from 129S1 mice, cleaned, and processed in 75% ethanol to remove cellular debris as previously described.[6] All allografts were stored at −80 oC until use. To enable tracking of the donor cell fate, PDMPCs were isolated from GFP transgenic mice as previously described.[10,48] Briefly, live bone autograft transplantations were performed in GFP transgenic mice. At least 10 donor autografts were collected at day 5 after transplantation. Periosteum tissues were scraped off and pooled in a Petri dish. After digestion with Collagenase D (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml for 1 hour, cells released from periosteal tissues were pooled and cultured in α-MEM medium containing 1% penicillin and streptomycin, 1% glutamine, and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Once confluent, cells were trypsinized and further expanded in α-MEM medium containing 10% FBS. Periosteal cells from fourth and fifth passage were collected and used for all experiments. PDMPCs were infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-ShhN at a multiplicity of infection of 100. A total of 1 × 106 cells were seeded onto a collagen scaffold (Cat no. 354613, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and wrapped around a bone allograft. The treated bone allograft was used to repair a 4-mm segmental bone defect created in the immunodeficient mice. A total of 20 immunodeficient mice were split into two experimental groups: allografts treated with Ad-GFP-PDMPCs or allografts treated with Ad-ShhN-PDMPCs. Four animals from each group were harvested at 2-week postsurgery for cell tracking and vascular analyses. The remaining six mice per group were harvested at 6 weeks for histologic and MicroCT analyses. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were prepared by H&E/Alcian Blue staining as previously described.[5] Histomorphometric analyses were performed using at least three nonconsecutive sections of each sample, 50 µm apart in the center region of the callus. The percentages of bone, cartilage, and fibrotic tissue formation at the side of donor and host were determined using Osteometrics, which allows interactive tracing of the area of new bone, cartilage, and fibrotic tissue (total callus subtracted from bone and cartilage tissue). A detailed description of the analyses can be found in a previous publication.[23] Briefly, a line was drawn in the middle of the distal or proximal junctions between graft and host bone to separate new bone formation on the surface of the graft and the host bone. Areas of bone, cartilage, and fibrotic tissue on the side of the host or graft were measured separately at both ends to evaluate host and graft bone formation. Femurs were harvested at 6 weeks and scanned by a Viva MicroCT system (Scanco Medical, Fabrikweg, Switzerland) at a voxel size of 10.5 µm. From the two-dimensional slice images generated, an appropriate threshold was chosen for the bone voxels by visually matching thresholded areas to gray-scale images. Each sample was contoured around the external callus and along the edge of the cortical bone, excluding the marrow cavity. New bone volume was measured on the surface of the host and donor bone, as well as in the total callus in grafted samples as previously described.[6] Immunohistochemical staining for GFP or CD31 was performed separately on paraffin-embedded tissue sections using a MaxPoly-Two Polymer HRP Mouse Detection Kit (MaxVision Biosciences, Seattle, WA). Primary antibodies for GFP (ab6673) and mouse CD31 (ab28364) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) and used in the staining. To determine the number of microvessels in the scaffold region, CD31+ vessels consisting of at least three cells with a lumen structure were counted. The mean of the three nonconsecutive sections from each allograft sample, harvested at 2 weeks after implantation, was used to determine revascularization of the scaffold. At least four allograft samples in each group were used to quantify the number of microvessels per mm2 area of the scaffold. Total RNA was prepared using a Qiagen RNA extraction kit. Exactly 0.5 µg of mRNA from four different samples was pooled and reverse transcribed to make single-strand cDNA, using a commercial first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction reaction was performed using SyberGreen (ABgene, Rochester, NY) in a RotorGene real time polymerase chain reaction machine (Corbett Research, Carlsbad, CA). All gene expressions were normalized to β-actin and presented as relative to that observed in cells transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-ShhN. All primers used for the assessment can be found in previous publications.[10,48,49] Endothelial precursors were isolated from the hind limb skeletal muscle of C57BL6 mice as previously described.[21] Briefly, muscle was minced into small pieces, digested with a final concentration of 2 mg/ml Collagenase type IV (Worthington) supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 45 minutes at 37 °C. To eliminate connective tissue and fibers, samples were passed through 70 and 40 µm nylon cell strainers (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue was isolated from subcutaneous fat as described.[50] Bone marrow cells were prepared by flushing the cells from long bone cavity.[5] Mononuclear cells from muscle, fat, and bone marrow were washed, centrifuged, and resuspended in PBS containing 4% FBS for antibody staining. The following antibodies were used for FACS analyses and cell sorting: PerCP conjugated antimouse CD45 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, Cat no. 557235), phycoerythrin-conjugated antimouse Sca-1 (eBioscience, Cat no. 12-5981-81), allophycocyanin-conjugated antimouse VEGFR2 (eBioscience, Cat no. 12-5921-80), and antimouse CD34 conjugated with Brilliant violet 421(BD Pharmingen, Cat no. 562608). FACS analyses were performed using Canto II flow cytometer. Cell sorting was conducted using a 13-color Aria cell sorter Statler (BioRad, Hercules, CA). In vitro Isolated cells were seeded in Matrigel (R&D) at a density of 5 × 104 in EBM2 media (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) in 8-well chamber slides (Corning, Corning, NY). The complete EBM2 media supplemented with Lonza growth factor kit including GA100, rhFGF-B, rhEGF, VEGF, IGF1, ascorbic acid, heparin, and FBS were used for microvessel formation assay in Matrigel. After 3–7 days of culture, tube formation was inspected under an inverted light microscope. Isolated cells were also seeded on PDMPC monolayer culture in an 8-well chamber slide (Corning). In the coculture experiments, only basic EBM2 media were used for microvessel formation assays. After 3–7 days of coculture, capillary-like structure could be observed following CD31 immunofluorescent staining. Cells in the chamber slides were fixed with cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at 4 °C, followed by washing with PBSTX (0.3% triton X-100 in PBS) at room temperature, and blocking with PBSMT (3% BSA in 0.3% PBSTX) for 1 hour at room temperature. The cultures were incubated with antimouse CD31 (BD Pharmingen, Cat no. 553373) overnight followed by extensive wash with 0.3% PBSTX at room temperature. The number of CD31+-positive vessels was counted under a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager, Oberkochen, Germany). The average number of vessel fragments per mm2 culture area from four samples of each group was calculated and used for statistical analyses. The experiments were repeated three times in PDMPCs. PDMPCs were isolated from wild-type mice. Cells were infected with control adenovirus Ad-LacZ or Ad-ShhN at a multiplicity of infection of 100. A total of 1 × 106 cells were seeded onto a collagen scaffold and implanted into immunodeficient mice as previously described.[10] Three implants from control and ShhN-treated group were harvested 7 days after surgery. Tissues were minced into small pieces followed by digestion with 2 mg/ml Collagenase type IV (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ). Collected cells were passed through cell restrainers and immediately stained with indicated antibodies for FACS analyses. Frequencies of various populations of cells were analyzed and presented as means of three implants in each treatment group. All data are expressed as a mean value plus or minus the SEM. The statistical significance illustrated in and between control adenovirus-transduced and Ad-ShhN–transduced PDMPC was determined using Student's t-test. The statistical significance illustrated in and between Ad-GFP-PDMPC– and Ad-ShhN-PDMPC–treated allografts was determined using one-way analysis of variance and a Tukey's post hoc test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Figure S1. Western blot analyses show that PDMPCs transduced with ShhN have higher level of Runx2 protein. Figure S2. Bone marrow cells contain fewer endothelial progenitors. Figure S3. Mononuclear cells from adipose tissue or skeletal muscles contained abundant endothelial progenitors.
  50 in total

1.  Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting.

Authors:  Huipin Yuan; Hugo Fernandes; Pamela Habibovic; Jan de Boer; Ana M C Barradas; Ad de Ruiter; William R Walsh; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Joost D de Bruijn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hedgehog regulates distinct vascular patterning events through VEGF-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Leigh Coultas; Erica Nieuwenhuis; Gregory A Anderson; Jorge Cabezas; Andras Nagy; R Mark Henkelman; Chi-Chung Hui; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Activation of the Hh pathway in periosteum-derived mesenchymal stem cells induces bone formation in vivo: implication for postnatal bone repair.

Authors:  Qun Wang; Chunlan Huang; Fanjie Zeng; Ming Xue; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  A novel strategy incorporated the power of mesenchymal stem cells to allografts for segmental bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xiao Hui Zou; Hong Xin Cai; Zi Yin; Xiao Chen; Yang Zi Jiang; Hu Hu; Hong Wei Ouyang
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  A perspective: engineering periosteum for structural bone graft healing.

Authors:  Xinping Zhang; Hani A Awad; Regis J O'Keefe; Robert E Guldberg; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  PTH-enhanced structural allograft healing is associated with decreased angiopoietin-2-mediated arteriogenesis, mast cell accumulation, and fibrosis.

Authors:  Robinder S Dhillon; Chao Xie; Wakenda Tyler; Laura M Calvi; Hani A Awad; Michael J Zuscik; Regis J O'Keefe; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Comparative efficacy of dermal fibroblast-mediated and direct adenoviral bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene therapy for bone regeneration in an equine rib model.

Authors:  A Ishihara; L J Zekas; S E Weisbrode; A L Bertone
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Sonic hedgehog regulates angiogenesis and myogenesis during post-natal skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  Giuseppe Straface; Tamar Aprahamian; Andrea Flex; Eleonora Gaetani; Federico Biscetti; Roy C Smith; Giovanni Pecorini; Enrico Pola; Flavia Angelini; Egidio Stigliano; John J Castellot; Douglas W Losordo; Roberto Pola
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Sonic hedgehog promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in a coculture system consisting of primary osteoblasts and outgrowth endothelial cells.

Authors:  Eva Dohle; Sabine Fuchs; Marlen Kolbe; Alexander Hofmann; Harald Schmidt; Charles James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Transient overexpression of sonic hedgehog alters the architecture and mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Maija Kiuru; Jason Solomon; Bassem Ghali; Marjolein van der Meulen; Ronald G Crystal; Chisa Hidaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Lessons on skeletal cell plasticity from studying jawbone regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Sandeep Paul; J Gage Crump
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 2.  Stromal cells and stem cells in clinical bone regeneration.

Authors:  Warren L Grayson; Bruce A Bunnell; Elizabeth Martin; Trivia Frazier; Ben P Hung; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Emulating native periosteum cell population and subsequent paracrine factor production to promote tissue engineered periosteum-mediated allograft healing.

Authors:  Michael D Hoffman; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Lumbar intervertebral disc allograft transplantation: the revascularisation pattern.

Authors:  Yong-Can Huang; Jun Xiao; Victor Y Leung; William W Lu; Yong Hu; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  BBS9 gene in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: Role of the primary cilium in the aberrant ossification of the suture osteogenic niche.

Authors:  Marta Barba; Lorena Di Pietro; Luca Massimi; Maria Concetta Geloso; Paolo Frassanito; Massimo Caldarelli; Fabrizio Michetti; Stefano Della Longa; Paul A Romitti; Concezio Di Rocco; Alessandro Arcovito; Ornella Parolini; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Camilla Bernardini; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Wanda Lattanzi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Toll-like receptor 4 mediates the regenerative effects of bone grafts for calvarial bone repair.

Authors:  Dan Wang; James R Gilbert; Melissa A Shaw; Sameer Shakir; Joseph E Losee; Timothy R Billiar; Gregory M Cooper
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yuankun Zhai; Marc Nuzzo; Xiaochuan Yang; Yunpeng Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Ihha induces hybrid cartilage-bone cells during zebrafish jawbone regeneration.

Authors:  Sandeep Paul; Simone Schindler; Dion Giovannone; Alexandra de Millo Terrazzani; Francesca V Mariani; J Gage Crump
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 9.  Recent Advances and Future of Gene Therapy for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Raphael Lieber; Dan Gazit; Gadi Pelled
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Exosomes from miRNA-378-modified adipose-derived stem cells prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head by enhancing angiogenesis and osteogenesis via targeting miR-378 negatively regulated suppressor of fused (Sufu).

Authors:  Kai Nan; Yuankai Zhang; Xin Zhang; Dong Li; Yan Zhao; Zhaopu Jing; Kang Liu; Donglong Shang; Zilong Geng; Lihong Fan
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.