Literature DB >> 21723141

Guided bone regeneration in pig calvarial bone defects using autologous mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells - a comparison of different tissue sources.

Philipp Stockmann1, Jung Park, Cornelius von Wilmowsky, Emeka Nkenke, Endre Felszeghy, Jan-Friedrich Dehner, Christian Schmitt, Christian Tudor, Karl Andreas Schlegel.   

Abstract

Due to donor side morbidity and the absence of osteogenic properties in bone substitutes, there is a growing need for an alternative to traditional bone grafting within the scope of tissue engineering. This animal study was conducted to compare the in vivo osteogenic potential of adipose-derived (AD), periosteum-derived (PD) and bone marrow-derived (BM) mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSC). Autologous mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells of named tissue origin were induced into osteogenic differentiation following in vitro cell expansion. Ex vivo cultivated cells were seeded on a collagen scaffold and subsequently added to freshly created monocortical calvarial bone defects in 21 domestic pigs. Pure collagen scaffold served as a control defect. The animals were sacrificed at specific time points and de novo bone formation was quantitatively analyzed by histomorphometry. Bone volume/total defect volume (BV/TV) and the mineralization rate of newly formed bone were compared among the groups. In the early stages of wound healing, up to 30 days, the test defects did not show better bone regeneration than those in the control defect, but the bone healing process in the test defects was accelerated in the later stage compared to those in the control defect. All the test defects showed complete osseous healing after 90 days compared to those in the control defect. During the observation period, no significant differences in BV/TV and mineralization of newly formed bone among the test defects were observed. Irrespective of the tissue sources of MSC, the speed and pattern of osseous healing after cell transplantations into monocortical bone defects were comparable. Our results indicate that the efficiency of autologous AD-MSC, PD-MSC and BM-MSC transplantation following ex vivo cell expansion is not significantly different for the guided regeneration of bone defects.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723141     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  24 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Stem and progenitor cells: advancing bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Tevlin; G G Walmsley; O Marecic; Michael S Hu; D C Wan; M T Longaker
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 3.  Osteogenic potential: Comparison between bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Han-Tsung Liao; Chien-Tzung Chen
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 4.  Honing Cell and Tissue Culture Conditions for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnny Lam; Esther J Lee; Elisa C Clark; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  A comparison of tissue engineering based repair of calvarial defects using adipose stem cells from normal and osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  Ming Pei; Jingting Li; David B McConda; Sijin Wen; Nina B Clovis; Suzanne S Danley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Susan W Volk; Christine Theoret
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are Phenotypically Superior for Regeneration in the Setting of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Matthew T Houdek; Ruben J Crespo-Diaz; German A Norambuena; Paul G Stalboerger; Andre Terzic; Atta Behfar; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Arthritic periosteal tissue from joint replacement surgery: a novel, autologous source of stem cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Denitsa Docheva; Ulf R Knothe; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Lineage mapping and characterization of the native progenitor population in cellular allograft.

Authors:  Mike Chen; Rahul Jandial; Josh Neman; Vincent Duenas; Claudia Kowolik; Amanda Hambrecht
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  The Role of Adipose Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration and Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Wolfgang Mende; Rebekka Götzl; Yusuke Kubo; Thomas Pufe; Tim Ruhl; Justus P Beier
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.