Literature DB >> 21421268

The combined bone forming capacity of human periosteal derived cells and calcium phosphates.

Scott J Roberts1, Liesbet Geris, Greet Kerckhofs, Eline Desmet, Jan Schrooten, Frank P Luyten.   

Abstract

Current knowledge suggests that the periosteum, a fibrous tissue which covers the surface of all bones, contains a population of progenitor cells which mediate the repair of bone defects. In an effort to optimise the utilisation of this source of cells for bone engineering, herein we describe the rational selection of calcium phosphate (CaP) containing materials, based on biomaterial properties, and evaluation of their combined bone forming capacity. Five different commercially available orthopaedic 3D matrices composed of CaP particles in an open collagen network (NuOss™, CopiOs™, Bio-Oss(®), Collagraft™ and Vitoss(®)) were evaluated in vitro and in vivo with human periosteal derived cells (hPDCs). It was found that the cell-material combinations behaved quite differently in vivo, despite apparent in vitro similarities in gene expression profiles. Bone formation was highest within the NuOss™/hPDC implant at 13.03%, which also contained the highest incidence of bone marrow formation. The bone formed in this implant was chimeric with approximately 65% originating from implanted cells. Upon analysis of human specific gene expression, although it was found that predominantly osteogenic differentiation was observed within NuOss™/hPDC implants, a lesser induction of chondrogenic genes was also observed. The formation of a cartilage intermediate was confirmed by histology. Additionally the NuOss™/hPDC implant integrated into the mouse environment with apparent active scaffold resorption. This study demonstrates the importance of matching a cell support/biological matrix with a cell type and subsequently has outlined parameters which can be used for the rational selection of biomaterials for bone engineering.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421268     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  33 in total

1.  Humanized culture of periosteal progenitors in allogeneic serum enhances osteogenic differentiation and in vivo bone formation.

Authors:  Scott J Roberts; Helen C Owen; Wai Long Tam; Lien Solie; Sophie J Van Cromphaut; Greet Van den Berghe; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science.

Authors:  Céline Colnot
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Noninvasive real-time monitoring by alamarBlue(®) during in vitro culture of three-dimensional tissue-engineered bone constructs.

Authors:  Xiaohua Zhou; Inge Holsbeeks; Saartje Impens; Maarten Sonnaert; Veerle Bloemen; Frank Luyten; Jan Schrooten
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Macrophage-lineage TRAP+ cells recruit periosteum-derived cells for periosteal osteogenesis and regeneration.

Authors:  Bo Gao; Ruoxian Deng; Yu Chai; Hao Chen; Bo Hu; Xiao Wang; Shouan Zhu; Yong Cao; Shuangfei Ni; Mei Wan; Liu Yang; Zhuojing Luo; Xu Cao
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Biomineralized matrix-assisted osteogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Heemin Kang; Cai Wen; Yongsung Hwang; Yu-Ru V Shih; Mrityunjoy Kar; Sung Wook Seo; Shyni Varghese
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 6.  Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Sox9 reprogrammed dermal fibroblasts undergo hypertrophic differentiation in vitro and trigger endochondral ossification in vivo.

Authors:  Wai Long Tam; Dorien F O; Kunihiko Hiramatsu; Noriyuki Tsumaki; Frank P Luyten; Scott J Roberts
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 8.  The clinical use of bone morphogenetic proteins revisited: a novel biocompatible carrier device OSTEOGROW for bone healing.

Authors:  Slobodan Vukicevic; Hermann Oppermann; Donatella Verbanac; Morana Jankolija; Irena Popek; Jasna Curak; Jelena Brkljacic; Martina Pauk; Igor Erjavec; Igor Francetic; Ivo Dumic-Cule; Mislav Jelic; Dragan Durdevic; Tomislav Vlahovic; Ruder Novak; Vera Kufner; Tatjana Bordukalo Niksic; Marija Kozlovic; Zrinka Banic Tomisic; Jadranka Bubic-Spoljar; Ivancica Bastalic; Smiljka Vikic-Topic; Mihaela Peric; Marko Pecina; Lovorka Grgurevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Mapping calcium phosphate activated gene networks as a strategy for targeted osteoinduction of human progenitors.

Authors:  Jeroen Eyckmans; Scott J Roberts; Johanna Bolander; Jan Schrooten; Christopher S Chen; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.