Literature DB >> 24085652

Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

Stuart L Silverman1, Jeffrey Curtis.   

Abstract

We know improving the quality of care in osteoporosis is an important goal. We have made some strides toward measuring quality of osteoporosis care, focusing on process measures regarding care that is provided. Unfortunately, improving care as measured by these process measures does not always yield improved outcomes. We need to hold health care providers and health care systems responsible not only for health care production but for production of health and well-being. However, there is a multiplicity of factors that will need to be considered to make this next step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085652     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-013-0176-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  16 in total

1.  The disconnect between better quality of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis preventive care and better outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Lisa M Lix; Suzanne N Morin; Marina Yogendran; Colleen J Metge; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Measuring osteoporosis quality: The work of the Joint Commission.

Authors:  Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Patient satisfaction in postmenopausal women treated with a weekly bisphosphonate transitioned to once-monthly ibandronate.

Authors:  Sydney Lou Bonnick; Stuart Silverman; S Bobo Tanner; Mark Martens; Gloria Bachmann; Joseph D Kohles; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  FRAX updates 2012.

Authors:  Eugene McCloskey; John A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Impact of clinical fractures on health-related quality of life is dependent on time of assessment since fracture: results from the FREEDOM trial.

Authors:  S Silverman; H N Viswanathan; Y-C Yang; A Wang; S Boonen; S Ragi-Eis; P Fardellone; N Gilchrist; P Lips; M Nevitt; S Palacios Gil-Antuñano; K Pavelka; D Revicki; J Simon; D Macarios; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Physicians' explanations for apparent gaps in the quality of rheumatology care: results from the US Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Pradeep Sharma; Tarun Arora; Aseem Bharat; Itara Barnes; Michael A Morrisey; Meredith Kilgore; Kenneth G Saag; Nicole C Wright; Huifen G Yun; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers.

Authors:  R H Brook; E A McGlynn; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older americans, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Laura Carbone; Hong Cheng; Burton Hayes; Andrew Laster; Robert Matthews; Kenneth G Saag; Robert Sepanski; Simpson B Tanner; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Improving the prediction of medication compliance: the example of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Juan Xi; Andrew O Westfall; Hong Cheng; Kenneth Lyles; Kenneth G Saag; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Stuart Silverman; Deborah T Gold
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.