Literature DB >> 18302495

Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older americans, 1999-2005.

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Laura Carbone, Hong Cheng, Burton Hayes, Andrew Laster, Robert Matthews, Kenneth G Saag, Robert Sepanski, Simpson B Tanner, Elizabeth Delzell.   

Abstract

Bone mass measurement (BMM) is useful to identify persons with low bone mass who are at increased risk for fracture. Given the increased emphasis that is being placed on preventive services such as screening for osteoporosis, we evaluated trends in BMM among Medicare beneficiaries. We studied a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries >or=65 yr of age in 1999-2005. We identified claims for BMM tests performed in both facility and nonfacility settings, evaluated temporal trends in use of these tests, and described the proportion of tests attributable to each specialty of physicians submitting claims. We also assessed patterns of serial testing among individuals who were tested more than once. Claims data from all years were pooled to describe the proportion of persons in the population ever tested. From 1999 to 2005, use of central DXA increased by approximately 50%, and use of peripheral DXA declined. The greatest increases in central DXA occurred among internists, family practitioners, and gynecologists. In 1999, the proportion of 65-yr-old women tested was 8.4%; this increased to 12.9% in 2005. Corresponding proportions for men were 0.6% and 1.7%, respectively. Between 40% and 73% of persons receiving central DXA were retested, most at approximately 2-yr intervals. Aggregating data across all years for whites and blacks, 30.0% of women and 4.4% of men underwent central DXA at least once. We conclude that, although use of DXA steadily increased from 1999 to 2005, only approximately 30% of women and 4% of men at least 65 yr old had a central DXA study. Given the importance of central DXA to assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures, strategies to increase central DXA use to test at-risk persons are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18302495      PMCID: PMC2497454          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Challenges in improving the quality of osteoporosis care for long-term glucocorticoid users: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Andrew O Westfall; Jeroan Allison; Angela Becker; Mary Elkins Melton; Allison Freeman; Catarina I Kiefe; Marilyn MacArthur; Theresa Ockershausen; Emily Stewart; Norm Weissman; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

3.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.

Authors:  E S Siris; P D Miller; E Barrett-Connor; K G Faulkner; L E Wehren; T A Abbott; M L Berger; A C Santora; L M Sherwood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

6.  Fracture Reduction Affects Medicare Economics (FRAME): impact of increased osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Alison B King; K G Saag; R T Burge; M Pisu; N Goel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Mark Helfand; Steven H Woolf; Janet D Allan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Access to osteoporosis treatment is critically linked to access to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Monique A M Gignac; Susan B Jaglal; Dorcas E Beaton; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988-2003.

Authors:  Randall S Stafford; Rebecca L Drieling; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-26

Review 10.  Position statement : executive summary. The Writing Group for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) Position Development Conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  53 in total

1.  The effect modification of supplemental insurance on the relationship between race and bone mineral density screening in female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ji Won Yoo; Shunichi Nakagawa; Sulgi Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

2.  Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman; Jeffrey Curtis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Actionable reminders did not improve performance over passive reminders for overdue tests in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Robert E El-Kareh; Tejal K Gandhi; Eric G Poon; Lisa P Newmark; Jonathan Ungar; E J Orav; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Screening Tests for Osteoporosis: Too Few for Some, Too Many for Others.

Authors:  Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Choosing wisely: the American College of Rheumatology's Top 5 list of things physicians and patients should question.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk; Mark Robbins; David Daikh; Ashley Beall; Edward Yelin; Jennifer Barton; Adam Carlson; Mary Margaretten; Joann Zell; Lianne S Gensler; Victoria Kelly; Kenneth Saag; Charles King
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Panoramic images of white and black post-menopausal females evidencing carotid calcifications are at high risk of comorbid osteopenia of the femoral neck.

Authors:  A H Friedlander; T I Chang; N Aghazadehsanai; G R Berenji; N D Harada; N R Garrett
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in the older senior.

Authors:  Sheryl F Vondracek; Sunny A Linnebur
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.