Literature DB >> 19563245

Patient satisfaction in postmenopausal women treated with a weekly bisphosphonate transitioned to once-monthly ibandronate.

Sydney Lou Bonnick1, Stuart Silverman, S Bobo Tanner, Mark Martens, Gloria Bachmann, Joseph D Kohles, Roberto Civitelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: CURRENT, a large, open-label, 6-month, multicenter study, was designed to assess patient satisfaction levels and patient treatment preference after switching from weekly oral bisphosphonates to monthly oral ibandronate for a period of 6 months.
METHODS: This study enrolled postmenopausal women who had taken a weekly oral bisphosphonate for at least 3 months for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis or osteopenia at the time of screening. Enrolled patients were switched to 150 mg monthly ibandronate. At baseline and 6 months, patients completed the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), consisting of four domains. Scores were converted to composite satisfaction scores (scale of 0-100). At 6 months, patients completed the Preference Questionnaire. Adverse events were monitored throughout.
RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 1678 patients. OPSAT-Q composite satisfaction scores improved by 9 points by month 6 despite the high mean baseline summary scores (80.1 points). Convenience, overall satisfaction, and quality of life domain scores improved by 15.6, 12, and 9.2 points, respectively. Increased satisfaction was reported by the majority of patients at month 6 (70.4%). Patients who reported stomach upset or suboptimal compliance with prestudy weekly bisphosphonate treatment were more likely to report improved satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] for stomach upset 2.98, 95% CI 1.52, 6.50, p = 0.0026; suboptimal compliance 1.82, 95% CI 1.13-3.04, p = 0.017). After 6 months, 73.6% of patients preferred monthly ibandronate to weekly bisphosphonates. The most frequently occurring adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (3.2% of patients), dyspepsia (2.5%), fracture (2.4%), arthralgia (2.3%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease, diarrhea, and nausea (2.2% each).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously using weekly bisphosphonates reported improved satisfaction with monthly ibandronate dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563245     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  10 in total

1.  Monthly or weekly bisphosphonate? Evaluation of satisfaction in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using OPSAT-Q questionnaire during the BOOSTER study in Croatia.

Authors:  Tonko Vlak; Darko Kaštelan; Petar Lozo; Jure Aljinović; Marina Gradišer; Sime Mijić; Tatjana Nikolić; Blaženka Miškić; Dolores Car; Gordana Tajšić; Tina Dušek; Zrinka Jajić; Frane Grubišić; Tamara Poljičanin; Miro Bakula; Feđa Džubur; Matilda Strižak-Ujević; Mira Kadojić; Maja Radman; Maja Vugrinec; Zeljka Kuster; Marijeta Pekez; Endi Radović; Ljubica Labar; Zeljka Crnčević-Orlić; Mirko Koršić
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman; Jeffrey Curtis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; S W Wade; T P Do; S Satram-Hoang; R Stewart; G Gao; D Macarios
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in postmenopausal women intermittently treated with oral bisphosphonates: the BRAVO study.

Authors:  Ki Won Oh; Deog-Yoon Kim; Yil-Seob Lee; Moo Il Kang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A retrospective analysis of extended-interval dosing and the impact on bisphosphonate compliance in the US Military Health System.

Authors:  J Devine; S Trice; Z Finney; S Yarger; E Nwokeji; A Linton; W Davies
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence.

Authors:  Carla Dias Barbosa; Maria-Magdalena Balp; Károly Kulich; Nicola Germain; Diana Rofail
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Effect of dosing interval duration of intermittent ibandronate treatment on the healing process of femoral osteotomy in a rat fracture model.

Authors:  Takeshi Manabe; Satoshi Mori; Tasuku Mashiba; Yoshio Kaji; Ken Iwata; Satoshi Komatsubara; Tetsuji Yamamoto
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Physicians' perspectives on the treatment of osteoporosis patients with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Tao Gu; Debra F Eisenberg Lawrence; Judith J Stephenson; Jingbo Yu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Gastrointestinal tolerability with ibandronate after previous weekly bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  Richard Derman; Joseph D Kohles; Ann Babbitt
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 10.  A Review of Patient Preferences for Osteoporosis Drug Treatment.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Sandrine P G Bours; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.