BACKGROUND: In imminently dying patients, mechanical ventilation withdrawal is often a comfort measure and avoids prolonging the dying process. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and time to death after extubation. METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine factors associated with time to death after extubation. We retrospectively evaluated 322 patients who died on mechanical ventilation or after palliative ventilator withdrawal at a single tertiary care center. RESULTS: Of the 322 ventilated deaths, 159 patients had palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and 163 patients died on the ventilator. Clinical service was associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation: Patients withdrawn from the ventilator were less likely to be on the surgery service and more likely to be on the neurology/neurosurgical service. The median time to death was 0.9 hours (range 0-165 hours). Fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) greater than 70% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI ]1.24-2.99) and a requirement for vasopressors (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.38-3.09) were associated with shorter time to death. Being on the neurology/neurosurgical service at the time of ventilator withdrawal was associated with a longer time to death (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation was performed in only half of dying mechanically ventilated patients. Because clinical service rather than physiologic parameters are associated with withdrawal, targeted interventions may improve withdrawal decisions. Considering FIO2 and vasopressor requirements may facilitate counseling families about anticipated time to death.
BACKGROUND: In imminently dying patients, mechanical ventilation withdrawal is often a comfort measure and avoids prolonging the dying process. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and time to death after extubation. METHODS: Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine factors associated with time to death after extubation. We retrospectively evaluated 322 patients who died on mechanical ventilation or after palliative ventilator withdrawal at a single tertiary care center. RESULTS: Of the 322 ventilated deaths, 159 patients had palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and 163 patients died on the ventilator. Clinical service was associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation: Patients withdrawn from the ventilator were less likely to be on the surgery service and more likely to be on the neurology/neurosurgical service. The median time to death was 0.9 hours (range 0-165 hours). Fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) greater than 70% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI ]1.24-2.99) and a requirement for vasopressors (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.38-3.09) were associated with shorter time to death. Being on the neurology/neurosurgical service at the time of ventilator withdrawal was associated with a longer time to death (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation was performed in only half of dying mechanically ventilated patients. Because clinical service rather than physiologic parameters are associated with withdrawal, targeted interventions may improve withdrawal decisions. Considering FIO2 and vasopressor requirements may facilitate counseling families about anticipated time to death.
Authors: Anne M Walling; Steven M Asch; Karl A Lorenz; Carol P Roth; Tod Barry; Katherine L Kahn; Neil S Wenger Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-06-28
Authors: Panayiotis N Varelas; Lotfi Hacein-Bey; Lonni Schultz; Mary Conti; Marianna V Spanaki; Thomas A Gennarelli Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jonathan Lewis; James Peltier; Helen Nelson; William Snyder; Kristi Schneider; Dina Steinberger; Michael Anderson; Alexander Krichevsky; James Anderson; Jill Ellefson; Anthony D'Alessandro Journal: Prog Transplant Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 1.065
Authors: Laveena Munshi; Sonny Dhanani; Sam D Shemie; Laura Hornby; Genevieve Gore; Jason Shahin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ann C Long; Sarah Muni; Patsy D Treece; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Annette L Fitzpatrick; J Randall Curtis Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Ryan Zarychanski; Dean A Fergusson; Caroline Léger; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Francis Bernard; Andrea Rigamonti; Karen Burns; Donald E Griesdale; Robert Green; Damon C Scales; Maureen O Meade; Martin Savard; Michèle Shemilt; Jérôme Paquet; Jean-Luc Gariépy; André Lavoie; Kesh Reddy; Draga Jichici; Giuseppe Pagliarello; David Zygun; Lynne Moore Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Fábio Holanda Lacerda; Pedro Garcia Checoli; Carla Marchini Dias da Silva; Carlos Eduardo Brandão; Daniel Neves Forte; Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2020 Oct-Dec
Authors: Hsiao-Ting Chang; Ming-Hwai Lin; Chun-Ku Chen; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shinn-Jang Hwang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390