| Literature DB >> 27155604 |
Alice Cottereau1, René Robert2,3, Amélie le Gouge4, Mélanie Adda5, Juliette Audibert6, François Barbier7, Patrick Bardou8, Simon Bourcier9, Alexandre Boyer10, François Brenas11, Emmanuel Canet12, Daniel Da Silva13, Vincent Das1, Arnaud Desachy14, Jérôme Devaquet15, Nathalie Embriaco16, Beatrice Eon17, Marc Feissel18, Diane Friedman19, Frédérique Ganster20, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas21, Guillaume Grillet22, Olivier Guisset23, Christophe Guitton24, Rebecca Hamidfar-Roy25, Anne-Claire Hyacinthe26, Sebastien Jochmans27, Fabien Lion28, Mercé Jourdain29, Alexandre Lautrette30, Nicolas Lerolle31, Olivier Lesieur32, Philippe Mateu33, Bruno Megarbane12, Emmanuelle Mercier34, Jonathan Messika35, Paul Morin-Longuet36, Bénédicte Philippon-Jouve37, Jean-Pierre Quenot38, Anne Renault39, Xavier Repesse40, Jean-Philippe Rigaud41, Ségolène Robin42, Antoine Roquilly43, Amélie Seguin44, Didier Thevenin45, Patrice Tirot46, Laetitia Contentin4, Nancy Kentish-Barnes47, Jean Reignier48,49.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Terminal extubation (TE) and terminal weaning (TW) are the methods available for withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Perceptions of TE and TW by intensive care unit (ICU) staff may influence bedside practices and the feasibility of studies comparing these methods.Entities:
Keywords: Critical care; Ethics; Mechanical ventilation; Terminal extubation; Terminal weaning; Treatment limitation
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27155604 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4373-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440