Literature DB >> 10331685

Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit.

S A Mayer1, S B Kossoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and clinical course of terminal extubation in the neurological intensive care unit, to identify factors that influence the decision to withdraw life support, and to evaluate the experiences of surrogate decision-makers.
BACKGROUND: The right of patients to refuse life-prolonging treatment is widely accepted. However, it is unknown how frequently critically ill neurologic patients are removed from life support, and practice guidelines for withdrawing mechanical ventilation remain poorly defined.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients cared for by the Columbia-Presbyterian neurocritical care service over a 3-year period who died, and identified a subgroup of non-brain-dead patients who were terminally extubated. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of these patients and interviewed their surrogate decision-makers.
RESULTS: Of 74 non-brain-dead patients, 32 (43%) were terminally extubated. Hispanic and white patients were more likely to be extubated than were African American patients (p = 0.02). The median duration of survival after extubation was 7.5 hours; 25% died within 1 hour, and 69% within 24 hours. Depth of coma did not predict the duration of survival after extubation. The most frequent signs after extubation were agonal or labored breathing (59%) and tachypnea (34%). Morphine or fentanyl was given to relieve respiratory distress in 68% of cases; the average dose of morphine was 6.3 mg/hour (range 2.5 to 20 mg/hour). In a structured interview of 24 surrogate decision-makers, 88% were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall process, and 75% felt the patient suffered minimally before death; all but one (96%) said that they would repeat the decision to withdraw life support.
CONCLUSIONS: Forty-three percent of our non-brain-dead patients who died were terminally extubated. The duration of survival after extubation exceeded 24 hours in one third, and was not predicted by level of consciousness. Two thirds of patients were treated with opioids for agonal respiratory distress. Most surrogate decision-makers were comfortable and satisfied with the process of withdrawing care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10331685     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.52.8.1602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  34 in total

1.  Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  In their own time: the family experience during the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  Debra Wiegand
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too?

Authors:  Saef Izzy; Rebecca Compton; Raphael Carandang; Wiley Hall; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Racial differences in withdrawal of mechanical ventilation do not alter mortality in neurologically injured patients.

Authors:  Michael A Rubin; Rajat Dhar; Michael N Diringer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Allison Bethune; Nadia Scantlebury; Ekaterina Potapova; Nicole Dinn; Victor Yang; Todd Mainprize; Mahmood Fazl; Farhad Pirouzmand; Leodante da Costa; Martin Chapman; Nicolas Phan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Côte; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; Damon C Scales; Francis Bernard; Ryan Zarychanski; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; David Zygun; Jean-François Simard; Amélie Boutin; Jacques G Brochu; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Causes and outcomes of persistent vegetative state in a Chinese versus American referral hospital.

Authors:  Farrah J Mateen; Jing-Wen Niu; Shan Gao; Shun-Wei Li; Marco Carone; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Wei-Hai Xu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Perceived Devastating Brain Injury: The Key Role of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Multi-Center Study of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Coma After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  K G Hirsch; M Mlynash; I Eyngorn; R Pirsaheli; A Okada; S Komshian; C Chen; S A Mayer; J F Meschia; R A Bernstein; O Wu; D M Greer; C A Wijman; G W Albers
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Are terminally ill patients dying in the ICU suitable for non-heart beating organ donation?

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Revelly; Luca Imperatori; Philippe Maravic; Marie-Denise Schaller; René Chioléro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.