Literature DB >> 24082861

The development and validation of a more discriminating functional hip score for research.

Sujith Konan1, Jenni Tahmassebi, Fares S Haddad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed procedure with increasing frequency in the young adult. While most available outcome measures can document postoperative improvement in pain and function, they do not measure the ability to perform high-demand activities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We present and validate a user-friendly discriminating hip scoring system (the functional hip score) for use in younger, "high-demand" patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery.
METHODS: We studied 38 subjects without any hip symptoms and 72 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis of the hip. Preprocedure and postprocedure scores were collected in the latter cohort of patients. SF-36 and WOMAC scores were used to validate our functional scoring system. The functional hip score was tested for internal consistency, reliability, and criterion validity.
RESULTS: The functional hip score had high test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and criterion validity. This can be used to measure functional outcome in the younger high-demand adult patient undergoing THA.
CONCLUSION: Our discriminating functional hip score can reliably measure improvement in hip function in the younger high-demand adult. Current scoring systems have ceiling effects and are unable to differentiate a high performing hip replacement from the routine hip replacement. The use of functional tasks that are measured objectively allows better documentation of improvement in hip function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional scores; hip outcomes; outcomes; young adult hip

Year:  2012        PMID: 24082861      PMCID: PMC3470667          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-012-9298-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  21 in total

1.  Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?

Authors:  P Söderman; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated.

Authors:  Christian P Christensen; Peter L Althausen; Murray A Mittleman; Jo-ann Lee; Joseph C McCarthy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.

Authors:  J N Katz; M G Larson; C B Phillips; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Stucki; O Sangha; S Stucki; B A Michel; A Tyndall; W Dick; R Theiler
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; W Rogers; A E Raczek; J F Lu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  C J Bachmeier; L M March; M J Cross; H M Lapsley; K L Tribe; B G Courtenay; P M Brooks
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; S Frost; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

9.  Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status.

Authors:  M Ostendorf; H F van Stel; E Buskens; A J P Schrijvers; L N Marting; A J Verbout; W J A Dhert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

10.  Early outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the role of femoral osteoplasty in symptomatic improvement.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; J C Vasconcelos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?

Authors:  Joel Wells; Michael Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Evgeny Bulat; Patricia Miller; Travis Matheney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What Are the Benefits of Hip Resurfacing in Appropriate Patients? A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander S McLawhorn; Leonard T Buller; Jason L Blevins; Yuo Yu Lee; Edwin P Su
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-12-04

4.  Psychiatric Disorders and Genotoxicity Following Primary Metal on Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty and Their Correlation to Cobalt/Chromium Levels.

Authors:  Omaima I Abdel Hamid; Mohamed E Attia; Jon M Hirshon; Mohamed El-Shinawi; Moustafa El-Hussaini; Maged El-Setouhy
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  The Aberdeen Weight-Bearing Test (Knee): a new objective test for anterior knee discomfort.

Authors:  David Robert Walker MacDonald; Haroon Rehman; Carol Ann Carnegie; Jordi Tomas-Hernandez; Alan John Johnstone
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.693

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.