Literature DB >> 11764424

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement.

J Dawson1, R Fitzpatrick, S Frost, R Gundle, P McLardy-Smith, D Murray.   

Abstract

The Oxford hip score (OHS) is a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome which is often used after total hip replacement, and the EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) is a patient-based generic questionnaire for health assessment. In an analysis of the outcome at one year of 609 revision hip replacements (RHRs), we compared the OHS and EQ5D scores, postoperative patient satisfaction and change in pain. About 25% of the operations were repeat RHRs. At one year, 57% of patients were very pleased with their operation. The correlation between preoperative and postoperative scores and change scores for the OHS and EQ5D was high. For both instruments the effect sizes were large, but the greater effect size of the OHS suggests that it is particularly sensitive to improvements after RHR. The effect scores of the OHS declined with the number of previous RHRs, while those for the EQ5D seemed less sensitive. Our results confirm the value of the OHS in assessing outcome after RHR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11764424     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  31 in total

1.  Mapping the Oxford hip score onto the EQ-5D utility index.

Authors:  Rafael A Pinedo-Villanueva; David Turner; Andrew Judge; James P Raftery; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Jasvinder Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Norman A Johanson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty?

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Antonio Murcia-Mazón; Ana Torres; Virginia Querales; Antonio Murcia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cerebral microembolization during primary total hip arthroplasty and neuropsychologic outcome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rahul V Patel; Jan Stygall; Jane Harrington; Stanton P Newman; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The 2012 John Charnley Award: Clinical multicenter studies of the wear performance of highly crosslinked remelted polyethylene in THA.

Authors:  Charles R Bragdon; Michael Doerner; John Martell; Bryan Jarrett; Henrik Palm; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fast-track assessment clinic: selection of patients for a one-stop hip assessment clinic.

Authors:  S A Johnson; Y Kalairajah; P Moonot; N Steele; R E Field
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  The development and validation of a more discriminating functional hip score for research.

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-21

9.  GP referral of patients with osteoarthritis for consideration of total joint replacement: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Gretl A McHugh; Malcolm Campbell; Karen A Luker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcome measures in a registry setting.

Authors:  Aksel Paulsen; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.