Literature DB >> 24077303

Mapping quantitative trait loci by controlling polygenic background effects.

Shizhong Xu1.   

Abstract

A new mixed-model method was developed for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) by incorporating multiple polygenic covariance structures. First, we used genome-wide markers to calculate six different kinship matrices. We then partitioned the total genetic variance into six variance components, one corresponding to each kinship matrix, including the additive, dominance, additive × additive, dominance × dominance, additive × dominance, and dominance × additive variances. The six different kinship matrices along with the six estimated polygenic variances were used to control the genetic background of a QTL mapping model. Simulation studies showed that incorporating epistatic polygenic covariance structure can improve QTL mapping resolution. The method was applied to yield component traits of rice. We analyzed four traits (yield, tiller number, grain number, and grain weight) using 278 immortal F2 crosses (crosses between recombinant inbred lines) and 1619 markers. We found that the relative importance of each type of genetic variance varies across different traits. The total genetic variance of yield is contributed by additive × additive (18%), dominance × dominance (14%), additive × dominance (48%), and dominance × additive (15%) variances. Tiller number is contributed by additive (17%), additive × additive (22%), and dominance × additive (43%) variances. Grain number is mainly contributed by additive (42%), additive × additive (19%), and additive × dominance (31%) variances. Grain weight is almost exclusively contributed by the additive (73%) variance plus a small contribution from the additive × additive (10%) variance. Using the estimated genetic variance components to capture the polygenic covariance structure, we detected 39 effects for yield, 39 effects for tiller number, 24 for grain number, and 15 for grain weight. The new method can be directly applied to polygenic-effect-adjusted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in human and other species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bin genotype; epistasis; mixed model; quantitative trait locus; rice

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077303      PMCID: PMC3832267          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.157032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid.

Authors:  Jinping Hua; Yongzhong Xing; Weiren Wu; Caiguo Xu; Xinli Sun; Sibin Yu; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance.

Authors:  J P Hua; Y Z Xing; C G Xu; X L Sun; S B Yu; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid.

Authors:  Gang Zhou; Ying Chen; Wen Yao; Chengjun Zhang; Weibo Xie; Jinping Hua; Yongzhong Xing; Jinghua Xiao; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mapping quantitative trait loci using naturally occurring genetic variance among commercial inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Yuan-Ming Zhang; Yongcai Mao; Chongqing Xie; Howie Smith; Lang Luo; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Christoph Lippert; Jennifer Listgarten; Ying Liu; Carl M Kadie; Robert I Davidson; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Controlling the type I and type II errors in mapping quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  R C Jansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Gains in QTL detection using an ultra-high density SNP map based on population sequencing relative to traditional RFLP/SSR markers.

Authors:  Huihui Yu; Weibo Xie; Jia Wang; Yongzhong Xing; Caiguo Xu; Xianghua Li; Jinghua Xiao; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  54 in total

1.  A Random-Model Approach to QTL Mapping in Multiparent Advanced Generation Intercross (MAGIC) Populations.

Authors:  Julong Wei; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Andrés Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu; Dan Zhu; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; William M Muir; Bruce Craig; Katy Martin Rainey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic Variance Partitioning and Genome-Wide Prediction with Allele Dosage Information in Autotetraploid Potato.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Cari A Schmitz Carley; Paul C Bethke; Joseph J Coombs; Mark E Clough; Washington L da Silva; Walter S De Jong; David S Douches; Curtis M Frederick; Kathleen G Haynes; David G Holm; J Creighton Miller; Patricio R Muñoz; Felix M Navarro; Richard G Novy; Jiwan P Palta; Gregory A Porter; Kyle T Rak; Vidyasagar R Sathuvalli; Asunta L Thompson; G Craig Yencho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A receptor-like protein mediates plant immune responses to herbivore-associated molecular patterns.

Authors:  Adam D Steinbrenner; Maria Muñoz-Amatriaín; Antonio F Chaparro; Jessica Montserrat Aguilar-Venegas; Sassoum Lo; Satohiro Okuda; Gaetan Glauser; Julien Dongiovanni; Da Shi; Marlo Hall; Daniel Crubaugh; Nicholas Holton; Cyril Zipfel; Ruben Abagyan; Ted C J Turlings; Timothy J Close; Alisa Huffaker; Eric A Schmelz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Renate H Schmidt; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Estimation of non-additive genetic variance in human complex traits from a large sample of unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Valentin Hivert; Julia Sidorenko; Florian Rohart; Michael E Goddard; Jian Yang; Naomi R Wray; Loic Yengo; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Evaluation of the utility of gene expression and metabolic information for genomic prediction in maize.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Michael M Magwire; Christopher J Basten; Zhanyou Xu; Daolong Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.