Literature DB >> 24074941

Subject-specific knee joint geometry improves predictions of medial tibiofemoral contact forces.

Pauline Gerus1, Massimo Sartori, Thor F Besier, Benjamin J Fregly, Scott L Delp, Scott A Banks, Marcus G Pandy, Darryl D D'Lima, David G Lloyd.   

Abstract

Estimating tibiofemoral joint contact forces is important for understanding the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis. However, tibiofemoral contact force predictions are influenced by many factors including muscle forces and anatomical representations of the knee joint. This study aimed to investigate the influence of subject-specific geometry and knee joint kinematics on the prediction of tibiofemoral contact forces using a calibrated EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model of the knee. One participant fitted with an instrumented total knee replacement walked at a self-selected speed while medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces, ground reaction forces, whole-body kinematics, and lower-limb muscle activity were simultaneously measured. The combination of generic and subject-specific knee joint geometry and kinematics resulted in four different OpenSim models used to estimate muscle-tendon lengths and moment arms. The subject-specific geometric model was created from CT scans and the subject-specific knee joint kinematics representing the translation of the tibia relative to the femur was obtained from fluoroscopy. The EMG-driven model was calibrated using one walking trial, but with three different cost functions that tracked the knee flexion/extension moments with and without constraint over the estimated joint contact forces. The calibrated models then predicted the medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces for five other different walking trials. The use of subject-specific models with minimization of the peak tibiofemoral contact forces improved the accuracy of medial contact forces by 47% and lateral contact forces by 7%, respectively compared with the use of generic musculoskeletal model.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact force; EMG-driven modeling; Knee joint model; Muscle force

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24074941      PMCID: PMC3888900          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  41 in total

Review 1.  Bone density, dynamic joint loading and joint degeneration. A review.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; D R Sumner; J A Block
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Optimizing whole-body kinematics to minimize valgus knee loading during sidestepping: implications for ACL injury risk.

Authors:  C J Donnelly; D G Lloyd; B C Elliott; J A Reinbolt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities.

Authors:  Dong Zhao; Scott A Banks; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Knee muscle moment arms from MRI and from tendon travel.

Authors:  C W Spoor; J L van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Variability of femoral muscle attachments.

Authors:  G N Duda; D Brand; S Freitag; W Lierse; E Schneider
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Influences of configuration changes of the patella on the knee extensor mechanism.

Authors:  Cheng C-K; Yao N-K; Liu H-C; Lee K-S
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Changes induced by chronic in vivo load alteration in the tibiofemoral joint of mature rabbits.

Authors:  Maria L Roemhildt; Bruce D Beynnon; Mack Gardner-Morse; Gary Badger; Calsey Grant
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  EMG-driven modeling approach to muscle force and joint load estimations: case study in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Katherine S Rudolph; Kurt T Manal
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking.

Authors:  O D Schipplein; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Subject-specific tendon-aponeurosis definition in Hill-type model predicts higher muscle forces in dynamic tasks.

Authors:  Pauline Gerus; Guillaume Rao; Eric Berton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  46 in total

1.  Modeling and simulating the neuromuscular mechanisms regulating ankle and knee joint stiffness during human locomotion.

Authors:  Massimo Sartori; Marco Maculan; Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Ziyun Ding; Chui K Tsang; Daniel Nolte; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Greater magnitude tibiofemoral contact forces are associated with reduced prevalence of osteochondral pathologies 2-3 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David John Saxby; Adam L Bryant; Ans Van Ginckel; Yuanyuan Wang; Xinyang Wang; Luca Modenese; Pauline Gerus; Jason M Konrath; Karine Fortin; Tim V Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Flavia M Cicuttini; Christopher Vertullo; Julian A Feller; Tim Whitehead; Price Gallie; David G Lloyd
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Authors:  Aimad El Habachi; Florent Moissenet; Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Multiscale musculoskeletal modelling, data-model fusion and electromyography-informed modelling.

Authors:  J Fernandez; J Zhang; T Heidlauf; M Sartori; T Besier; O Röhrle; D Lloyd
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Development of a Subject-Specific Foot-Ground Contact Model for Walking.

Authors:  Jennifer N Jackson; Chris J Hass; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Influence of Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Mechanics in Walking.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  How tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations affect predictions of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces.

Authors:  Zachary F Lerner; Matthew S DeMers; Scott L Delp; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Biofeedback for Gait Retraining Based on Real-Time Estimation of Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; David J Saxby; Elena Ceseracciu; Luca Modenese; David G Lloyd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.