Literature DB >> 17290383

In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities.

Dong Zhao1, Scott A Banks, Darryl D D'Lima, Clifford W Colwell, Benjamin J Fregly.   

Abstract

Though asymmetric loading between the medial and lateral compartments of total knee replacements may contribute to implant loosening and failure, the in vivo contact force distribution during dynamic daily activities remains unknown. This study reports in vivo medial and lateral contact forces experienced by a well-aligned knee implant for a variety of activities. In vivo implant motion and total axial load data were collected from a single knee replacement patient performing treadmill gait (hands resting on handlebars), step up/down, lunge, and kneel activities. In vivo motion was measured using video fluoroscopy, while in vivo axial loads were collected simultaneously using an instrumented tibial component. An elastic foundation contact model employing linear and nonlinear polyethylene material properties was constructed to calculate medial and lateral contact forces based on the measured kinematics, total axial loads, and centers of pressure. For all activities, the predicted medial and lateral contact forces were insensitive to the selected material model. The percentage of medial to total contact force ranged from 18 to 60 for gait, 47 to 65 for step up/down, and 55 to 60 for kneel and lunge. At maximum load during the motion cycle, medial force was 1.2 BW for gait and 2.0 BW for step up/down, while the corresponding lateral forces were 1.0 and 1.5 BW, respectively. At mean load in the final static pose, medial force was 0.2 BW for kneel and 0.9 BW for lunge, with corresponding lateral forces of 0.1 and 0.7 BW, respectively. For this patient, a constant load split of 55% medial-45% lateral during loaded activity would be a reasonable approximation for these test conditions. (c) 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17290383     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  46 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Prosthetic component segmentation with blur compensation: a fast method for 3D fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Giacomo Tarroni; Luca Tersi; Cristiana Corsi; Rita Stagni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Shorter survival rate in varus-aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-Xiao Liu; Ping Shang; Xiao-Zhou Ying; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Ziyun Ding; Chui K Tsang; Daniel Nolte; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Changes in in vivo knee loading with a variable-stiffness intervention shoe correlate with changes in the knee adduction moment.

Authors:  Jennifer C Erhart; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Modified gap-balancing technique in total knee arthroplasty: evaluation of the post-operative coronal laxity.

Authors:  Taka-aki Moro-oka; Hirokazu Shiraishi; Yukihide Iwamoto; Scott A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-in-a-knee: in vivo knee forces, kinematics, and contact analysis.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Shantanu Patil; Nicolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Altered loading in the injured knee after ACL rupture.

Authors:  Emily S Gardinier; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Effective gait patterns for offloading the medial compartment of the knee.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  In-vivo kinematics of knee prostheses patients during level walking compared with the ISO force-controlled simulator standard.

Authors:  V Ngai; T Schwenke; M A Wimmer
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.