Literature DB >> 25783762

Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.

Aimad El Habachi1, Florent Moissenet, Sonia Duprey, Laurence Cheze, Raphaël Dumas.   

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is a typical part of biomechanical models evaluation. For lower limb multi-body models, sensitivity analyses have been mainly performed on musculoskeletal parameters, more rarely on the parameters of the joint models. This study deals with a global sensitivity analysis achieved on a lower limb multi-body model that introduces anatomical constraints at the ankle, tibiofemoral, and patellofemoral joints. The aim of the study was to take into account the uncertainty of parameters (e.g. 2.5 cm on the positions of the skin markers embedded in the segments, 5° on the orientation of hinge axis, 2.5 mm on the origin and insertion of ligaments) using statistical distributions and propagate it through a multi-body optimisation method used for the computation of joint kinematics from skin markers during gait. This will allow us to identify the most influential parameters on the minimum of the objective function of the multi-body optimisation (i.e. the sum of the squared distances between measured and model-determined skin marker positions) and on the joint angles and displacements. To quantify this influence, a Fourier-based algorithm of global sensitivity analysis coupled with a Latin hypercube sampling is used. This sensitivity analysis shows that some parameters of the motor constraints, that is to say the distances between measured and model-determined skin marker positions, and the kinematic constraints are highly influencing the joint kinematics obtained from the lower limb multi-body model, for example, positions of the skin markers embedded in the shank and pelvis, parameters of the patellofemoral hinge axis, and parameters of the ankle and tibiofemoral ligaments. The resulting standard deviations on the joint angles and displacements reach 36° and 12 mm. Therefore, personalisation, customisation or identification of these most sensitive parameters of the lower limb multi-body models may be considered as essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783762     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1269-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  61 in total

1.  Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization.

Authors:  Sonia Duprey; Laurence Cheze; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait.

Authors:  Guillaume Rao; David Amarantini; Eric Berton; Daniel Favier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties.

Authors:  Christian Redl; Margit Gfoehler; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait.

Authors:  Mariska Wesseling; Friedl de Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Sensitivity of joint kinematics and kinetics to different pose estimation algorithms and joint constraints in the elderly.

Authors:  Vera Moniz-Pereira; Silvia Cabral; Filomena Carnide; António P Veloso
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Do kinematic models reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics.

Authors:  Michael S Andersen; Daniel L Benoit; Michael Damsgaard; Dan K Ramsey; John Rasmussen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity.

Authors:  U Glitsch; W Baumann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal.

Authors:  G K Cole; B M Nigg; J L Ronsky; M R Yeadon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  The inaccuracy of surface-measured model-derived tibiofemoral kinematics.

Authors:  Kang Li; Liying Zheng; Scott Tashman; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The effect of modelling parameters in the development and validation of knee joint models on ligament mechanics: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Sadat Farshidfar; Joseph Cadman; Danny Deng; Richard Appleyard; Danè Dabirrahmani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Experimental recommendations for estimating lower extremity loading based on joint and activity.

Authors:  Todd J Hullfish; John F Drazan; Josh R Baxter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Sensitivity of a juvenile subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the ankle joint to the variability of operator-dependent input.

Authors:  Iain Hannah; Erica Montefiori; Luca Modenese; Joe Prinold; Marco Viceconti; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Kinematic Modeling at the Ant Scale: Propagation of Model Parameter Uncertainties.

Authors:  Santiago Arroyave-Tobon; Jordan Drapin; Anton Kaniewski; Jean-Marc Linares; Pierre Moretto
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Knee Kinematics Estimation Using Multi-Body Optimisation Embedding a Knee Joint Stiffness Matrix: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Vincent Richard; Giuliano Lamberto; Tung-Wu Lu; Aurelio Cappozzo; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Modeling and classification of gait patterns between anterior cruciate ligament deficient and intact knees based on phase space reconstruction, Euclidean distance and neural networks.

Authors:  Wenbao Wu; Wei Zeng; Limin Ma; Chengzhi Yuan; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?

Authors:  Joris De Roeck; Kate Duquesne; Jan Van Houcke; Emmanuel A Audenaert
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.