Literature DB >> 24072405

Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation.

D A Eekman1, M M ter Wee, V M H Coupé, S Erisek-Demirtas, M H Kramer, W F Lems.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Data on direct and indirect costs of clinical fractures in 116 osteoporotic patients 50 years and older were prospectively collected using cost diaries. Indirect costs accounted for roughly half of the total costs, with a contribution of at least 81% of these costs in employed patients.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to gain insight into the current total costs of clinical fractures in osteoporotic patients aged 50 years and older.
METHODS: In a study in the Netherlands, patients prospectively filled out cost diaries every 3 months, during 1 year after a clinical fracture. Primary analyses were performed on those patients with all four cost diaries returned. In-depth analyses of indirect costs were performed, dividing results for employed and unemployed patients. Sensitivity analyses using imputation techniques were performed on patients who returned two or three diaries
RESULTS: Of the 116 included patients, 69 completed all four diaries, 24 only two or three, and 23 patient completed one or no diaries. For all fractures, approximately 50% of the total costs were due to indirect costs; employed patients contributed for at least 81% of the indirect cost. Humerus fractures were most expensive with a total 1-year cost of €16.841 per patient. Indirect costs in the group with clinical spine fractures were highest (<euro>12.522), accounting for 89.1% of the total costs for this fracture.
CONCLUSION: Indirect costs account for roughly half of the total costs of clinical fractures, which are largely related to sick leave. When performing cost analyses in fracture patients, we advise a societal perspective in which indirect costs are also considered, and to apply a patient derived prospective data collection method to get a 'true' and complete image of the total costs due to clinical fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072405     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2505-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap.

Authors:  J A Barber; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Philip Sambrook; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee.

Authors:  Veerle M H Coupé; Cindy Veenhof; Maurits W van Tulder; Joost Dekker; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Cornelia H M Van den Ende
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Burden of non-hip, non-vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  C Roux; A Wyman; F H Hooven; S H Gehlbach; J D Adachi; R D Chapurlat; J E Compston; C Cooper; A Díez-Pérez; S L Greenspan; A Z Lacroix; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; K G Saag; P N Sambrook; S Silverman; E S Siris; N B Watts; S Boonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Clinical burden and incremental cost of fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Lia Gutiérrez; Neil Roskell; Jordi Castellsague; Steve Beard; Catherine Rycroft; Shaun Abeysinghe; Paul Shannon; Matthew Gitlin; Sean Robbins
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  M E Goossens; M P Rutten-van Mölken; J W Vlaeyen; S M van der Linden
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic: an effective strategy for improving implementation of an osteoporosis guideline.

Authors:  Svenhjalmar van Helden; Evelyne Cauberg; Piet Geusens; Bjorn Winkes; Trudy van der Weijden; Peter Brink
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.

Authors:  D A Eekman; S H van Helden; A M Huisman; H J J Verhaar; I E M Bultink; P P Geusens; P Lips; W F Lems
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Estimating the excess costs for patients with incident fractures, prevalent fractures, and nonfracture osteoporosis.

Authors:  R B Hopkins; J E Tarride; W D Leslie; C Metge; L M Lix; S Morin; G Finlayson; M Azimaee; E Pullenayegum; R Goeree; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; L Thabane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Austria.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dimai; Kurt Redlich; Monika Peretz; Fredrik Borgström; Uwe Siebert; Jörg Mahlich
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2012-06-27
View more
  8 in total

1.  Pain and fracture-related limitations persist 6 months after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Lucy Frankel; Stephen Thielke; Larry Funnell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  The impact of fragility fractures on work and characteristics associated with time to return to work.

Authors:  N K Rotondi; D E Beaton; M Ilieff; C Adhihetty; D Linton; E Bogoch; J Sale; S Hogg-Johnson; S Jaglal; R Jain; J Weldon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Productivity loss associated with functional disability in a contemporary small-scale subsistence population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Paul L Hooper; Benjamin C Trumble; Hillard Kaplan; Michael D Gurven
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  O O Babatunde; M Bucknall; C Burton; J J Forsyth; N Corp; S Gwilym; Z Paskins; D A van der Windt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Economic burden of osteoporosis in the world: A systematic review.

Authors:  Asma Rashki Kemmak; Aziz Rezapour; Reza Jahangiri; Shima Nikjoo; Hiro Farabi; Samira Soleimanpour
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-11-12

6.  A systematic review of the indirect and social costs studies in fragility fractures.

Authors:  M Ruiz-Adame; M Correa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Posthospital Discharge Medical Care Costs and Family Burden Associated with Osteoporotic Fracture Patients in China from 2011 to 2013.

Authors:  Zhao Xie; Russel Burge; Yicheng Yang; Fen Du; Tie Lu; Qiang Huang; Wenyu Ye; Weihua Xu
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2015-06-28

8.  Estimating the Fiscal Costs of Osteoporosis in Korea Applying a Public Economic Perspective.

Authors:  Mark P Connolly; Saswat Panda; Ha Young Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2019-11-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.