Literature DB >> 34766193

Long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

O O Babatunde1, M Bucknall2, C Burton2, J J Forsyth3, N Corp2, S Gwilym4, Z Paskins2,5, D A van der Windt2.   

Abstract

A comprehensive review of studies shows that patients with wrist fracture, aged over 50 years, experience pain and functional limitation long after fracture. This is associated with increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Understanding factors that predict poor outcomes is important for future healthcare policy and planning.
PURPOSE: To summarise and appraise evidence on the prognosis and long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture among adults aged 50 years and over.
METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL-P and PsycINFO) were comprehensively searched (supplemented by a grey-literature search) from inception till June 2021 for prospective/retrospective cohort studies of patients (≥ 50 years) with a history of wrist fracture and reporting long-term (≥ 6 months) outcomes. Peer study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted. A random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise estimates of pain and function outcomes.
RESULTS: 78 studies (n = 688,041 patients) were included. Patients report persistent moderate to severe pain (range: 7.5%-62%) and functional limitations (range: 5.5-78%) up to 12-months or later after wrist fracture. Mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score for pain and function (9 studies, n = 1759 patients) was 15.23 (95%CI 12.77, 17.69) at 6-months to 13-years follow-up. Mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (9 studies, n = 1346 patients) was 13.82 (95%CI 12.71, 14.93)( at 6- to 17-months follow-up. A 10-20% increase in healthcare encounters in the first 12-months after fracture was observed. Twelve prognostic factors were associated with poor long-term outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Evidence shows that a high proportion of people aged over 50 years with wrist fracture experience pain and functional limitation > 6 months after fracture. This is associated with increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Exploratory evidence was found for several candidate prognostic factors. Their predictive performance needs to be investigated further. PROSPERO: CRD42018116478.
© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional limitation; Healthcare utilisation; Long-term pain; Prognosis; Wrist fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34766193     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06214-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  95 in total

1.  Factors related to a decline in upper extremity function among patients with a wrist fracture due to a fall.

Authors:  Nerea González; Ane Antón-Ladislao; Miren Orive; Jon Zabala; Susana García-Gutiérrez; Carlota Las Hayas; Jose Maria Quintana
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales.

Authors:  T P van Staa; E M Dennison; H G Leufkens; C Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Incidence of distal forearm fracture in British men and women.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; C Cooper; J D Finn; M Lunt; D Purdie; D M Reid; R Rowe; A D Woolf; W A Wallace
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Epidemiology of appendicular skeletal fractures: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Nottingham Fracture Liaison Service.

Authors:  Terence Ong; Opinder Sahota; Lindsey Marshall
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Functional decline after incident wrist fractures--Study of Osteoporotic Fractures: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Beatrice J Edwards; Jing Song; Dorothy D Dunlop; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-08

6.  Epidemiology of lifetime fracture prevalence in England: a population study of adults aged 55 years and over.

Authors:  Shaun Scholes; Sukhmeet Panesar; Nicola Jane Shelton; Roger M Francis; Saqeb Mirza; Jennifer S Mindell; Liam J Donaldson
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Non-hip, non-spine fractures drive healthcare utilization following a fracture: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  G Ioannidis; J Flahive; L Pickard; A Papaioannou; R D Chapurlat; K G Saag; S Silverman; F A Anderson; S H Gehlbach; F H Hooven; S Boonen; J E Compston; C Cooper; A Díez-Perez; S L Greenspan; A Z Lacroix; R Lindsay; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; P N Sambrook; E S Siris; N B Watts; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988-2012: Variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Robert van der Velde; Rebecca J Moon; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet Geusens; Frank de Vries; Tjeerd P van Staa; Cyrus Cooper; Nicholas C Harvey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).

Authors:  E Hernlund; A Svedbom; M Ivergård; J Compston; C Cooper; J Stenmark; E V McCloskey; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports.

Authors:  A Svedbom; E Hernlund; M Ivergård; J Compston; C Cooper; J Stenmark; E V McCloskey; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.