Literature DB >> 22684000

Clinical burden and incremental cost of fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom.

Lia Gutiérrez1, Neil Roskell, Jordi Castellsague, Steve Beard, Catherine Rycroft, Shaun Abeysinghe, Paul Shannon, Matthew Gitlin, Sean Robbins.   

Abstract

This cohort study of postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom aged ≥50years determined the incremental cost of health care and clinical outcomes in the 12months following incident, selected fractures (non-vertebral non-hip [NVNHF], vertebral [VF] and multiple [MF]). Incremental costs and outcomes of the fracture cohorts were compared with those of cohorts comprised of women without fractures who were individually matched on age and comorbidity. Cohorts were identified from The Health Improvement Network database, a primary health care database, from 2001 to 2005. We estimated 1-year incremental costs (hospitalizations; general practice, accident/emergency, and referral visits; and prescription medications) associated with each fracture type. Descriptive analyses examined occurrence of subsequent fractures and death. No long-term health care costs or outcomes were assessed. Overall, 14,030 women had NVNHF, 1471 had VF, and 193 had MF. The risk of death was greater for women with fractures than for women in the non-fracture cohorts. Mean incremental cost for fractures compared with no fractures was £1152 for VF; £690 for NVNHF, and £2581 for MF. Of the total incremental cost, hospitalizations represented 54%-90% and medications represented 7%-29%. In all fracture cohorts, most of the total annual costs were concentrated in the 6months after the date of fracture. Fractures among postmenopausal women represent an important burden to the health system due to the increase in health resource utilization and related costs. In this study, hospitalizations were the main driver of the overall incremental cost during the 12months following the fracture. Mortality in women in the selected fracture cohorts was higher than in women in the non-fracture cohorts.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684000     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

1.  The short-term impact of vitamin D-based hip fracture prevention in older adults in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Chris D Poole; Jamie C Smith; J Stephen Davies
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  The risk of fracture among patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Alexis Ogdie; Lauren Harter; Daniel Shin; Joshua Baker; Junko Takeshita; Hyon K Choi; Thorvardur Jon Love; Joel M Gelfand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Risk of fracture in urolithiasis: a population-based cohort study using the health improvement network.

Authors:  Michelle R Denburg; Mary B Leonard; Kevin Haynes; Shamir Tuchman; Gregory Tasian; Justine Shults; Lawrence Copelovitch
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Assessment of Sex Differences in Fracture Risk Among Patients With Anorexia Nervosa: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using The Health Improvement Network.

Authors:  Jason M Nagata; Neville H Golden; Mary B Leonard; Lawrence Copelovitch; Michelle R Denburg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  D A Eekman; M M ter Wee; V M H Coupé; S Erisek-Demirtas; M H Kramer; W F Lems
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Sarah Davis; Emma Simpson; Jean Hamilton; Marrissa Martyn-St James; Andrew Rawdin; Ruth Wong; Edward Goka; Neil Gittoes; Peter Selby
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Use of discussion boards in an online hip fracture resource center for caregivers.

Authors:  Eun-Shim Nahm; Barbara Resnick; Lisa Plummer; Bu Kyung Park
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.913

8.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting: the SCOOP study.

Authors:  E Söreskog; F Borgström; L Shepstone; S Clarke; C Cooper; I Harvey; N C Harvey; A Howe; H Johansson; T Marshall; T W O'Neill; T J Peters; N M Redmond; D Turner; R Holland; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A novel economic framework to assess the cost-effectiveness of bone-forming agents in the prevention of fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Söreskog; F Borgström; I Lindberg; O Ström; D Willems; C Libanati; J A Kanis; B Stollenwerk; M Charokopou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Status of bone health and association of socio-demographic characteristics with Bone Mineral Density in Pakistani Females.

Authors:  Saba Tariq; Mukhtiar Baig; Sundus Tariq; Muhammad Shahzad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.088

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.