Literature DB >> 24069079

The incidence and determinants of decubitus ulcers in hospital care: an analysis of routine quality management data at a university hospital.

Maria Eberlein-Gonska1, Thomas Petzold, Gitta Helaß, D Michael Albrecht, Jochen Schmitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of decubitus ulcers is an established quality indicator for external quality assurance in the inpatient setting. Epidemiologic analyses of the frequency of, and risk factors for, decubitus ulcers in routine care are lacking.
METHOD: We analyzed routine decubitus-ulcer documentation data relating to all inpatients of the University Hospital of Dresden, Germany, from 2007 to 2011 (n = 246 162 patients). The prevalence and incidence of decubitus ulcers and demographic and illness-related risk factors for them were determined with the use of descriptive techniques and logistic regression models. The effort-to-benefit ratio of documenting decubitus ulcers in various care scenarios was calculated in terms of the number of additional patients to be documented for each patient with incident decubitus ulcer.
RESULTS: The prevalence of decubitus ulcers was 1.21%, and their incidence during inpatient treatment was 0.78%, with significant differences across clinical care units (range of ward-specific incidences: 0.0% to 12.7%). Predictors for the development of a new decubitus ulcer during a hospital stay included higher age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.03), longer hospital stay (OR 1.03 per day, 95% CI 1.031-1.033), treatment in an intensive care unit (OR 2.88, 95% CI 2.58-3.22), and transfer to the hospital from a residential nursing-care facility (OR 6.05, 95% CI 5.13-7.11). The patient's sex and the severity of disease were not correlated with the incidence of decubitus ulcers. The effort-to-benefit ratio could be improved if wards with a low incidence of decubitus ulcers (<0.5%) either entirely discontinued the current hospital-wide procedure for documenting decubitus ulcers (with one new ulcer for every 645 patients) or continued it only for patients aged 65 or older (with one new ulcer for every 902 patients).
CONCLUSION: There are major differences between clinical care units in the risk of decubitus ulcers. Epidemiological analysis of routine quality management data is useful to assess the benefit of measures taken in medical care. Continuing evaluation is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24069079      PMCID: PMC3782025          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  7 in total

1.  [What is evidence-based concerning quality management? Thoughts about an apparently simple question].

Authors:  M Eberlein-Gonska
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Clinical utility of the Braden scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  B J Braden; N Bergstrom
Journal:  Decubitus       Date:  1989-08

3.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population.

Authors:  B J Braden; N Bergstrom
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  [Frequency of decubitus ulcer in patients of a university medical center. Combination of routine documentation and cross-sectional study].

Authors:  J Stausberg; K Kröger; I Maier; W Niebel; H Schneider
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; P J Demuth; B J Braden
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.208

7.  Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B Braden; M Kemp; M Champagne; E Ruby
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  [Plastic surgery for pressure ulcers].

Authors:  P M Vogt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  [Plastic surgery treatment techniques for interdisciplinary therapy of pressure sores].

Authors:  Karin Müller; Frederic Becker; Matthias Pfau; Frank Werdin
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  The quality of acute stroke care- an analysis of evidence-based indicators in 260 000 patients.

Authors:  Silke Wiedmann; Peter U Heuschmann; Steffi Hillmann; Otto Busse; Horst Wiethölter; Georg M Walter; Günter Seidel; Björn Misselwitz; Alfred Janssen; Klaus Berger; Christoph Burmeister; Christine Matthis; Peter Kolominsky-Rabas; Peter Hermaneks
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Conventional versus neutral positioning in central neurological disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heidrun Pickenbrock; Vera U Ludwig; Antonia Zapf; Dirk Dressler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  [Pressure sores-A multilayered challenge].

Authors:  Romana Lenzen-Großimlinghaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  On-admission pressure ulcer prediction using the nursing needs score.

Authors:  Yoko Nakamura; A Ammar Ghaibeh; Yoko Setoguchi; Kazue Mitani; Yoshiro Abe; Ichiro Hashimoto; Hiroki Moriguchi
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-02-11

7.  Treatment of femoral neck fracture with a minimal invasive surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty - clinical and radiological results in 180 geriatric patients.

Authors:  A C Unger; B Dirksen; F G Renken; E Wilde; M Willkomm; A P Schulz
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-07-11

8.  Henna ( Lawsonia inermis) as an Inexpensive Method to Prevent Decubitus Ulcers in Critical Care Units: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Davood Hekmatpou; Fatemeh Ahmadian; Maryam Eghbali; Shadi Farsaei
Journal:  J Evid Based Integr Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec

9.  Support pressure distribution for positioning in neutral versus conventional positioning in the prevention of decubitus ulcers: a pilot study in healthy participants.

Authors:  Heidrun Pickenbrock; Vera U Ludwig; Antonia Zapf
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2017-10-16

10.  Nutritional management of older hospitalised patients with pressure injuries.

Authors:  Doris Eglseer; Manuela Hödl; Christa Lohrmann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.