Silke Wiedmann1, Peter U Heuschmann, Steffi Hillmann, Otto Busse, Horst Wiethölter, Georg M Walter, Günter Seidel, Björn Misselwitz, Alfred Janssen, Klaus Berger, Christoph Burmeister, Christine Matthis, Peter Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter Hermaneks. 1. Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), University of Würzburg, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University of Würzburg, The Clinical Trial Center, University Hospital Würzburg, German Stroke Society (DSG), Berlin, Office for Quality Assurance in Hospitals (GeQiK), Stuttgart; Baden-Württemberg Hospital Association, Stuttgart, Germany, Department of Neurology, Vivantes-Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Department of Neurology, Asklepios Klinik Nord, Hamburg, Institute of Quality Assurance Hesse (GQH), Quality Assurance in Stroke Management in North Rhine-Westphalia, Medical Association North Rhine, Quality Assurance Project "Stroke Register Northwest Germany", Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Institute of Quality Assurance Rhineland-Palatinate / SQMed, Quality Association for Acute Stroke Treatment Schleswig-Holstein (QugSS), Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Erlangen Community Stroke Registry, Federal Health Reporting (GBE), Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health, Bavarian Permanent Working Party for Quality Assurance (BAQ), Munich.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke patients should be cared for in accordance with evidence-based guidelines. The extent of implementation of guidelines for the acute care of stroke patients in Germany has been unclear to date. METHODS: The regional quality assurance projects that cooperate in the framework of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Schlaganfall-Register, ADSR) collected data on the care of stroke patients in 627 hospitals in 2012. The quality of the acute hospital care of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was assessed on the basis of 15 standardized, evidence-based quality indicators and compared across the nine participating regional quality assurance projects. RESULTS: Data were obtained on more than 260 000 patients nationwide. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed in 59.7% of eligible ischemic stroke patients patients (range among participating projects, 49.7-63.6%). Dysphagia screening was documented in 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%). For the following indicators, the defined targets were not reached for all of Germany: anti-aggregation within 48 hours, 93.4% (range, 86.6-96.4%); anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, 77.6% (range, 72.4-80.1%); standardized dysphagia screening, 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%); oral and written information of the patients or their relatives, 86.1% (range, 75.4-91.5%). The rate of patients examined or treated by a speech therapist was in the target range. CONCLUSION: The defined targets were reached for most of the quality indicators. Some indicators, however, varied widely across regional quality assurance projects. This implies that the standardization of care for stroke patients in Germany has not yet been fully achieved.
BACKGROUND:Strokepatients should be cared for in accordance with evidence-based guidelines. The extent of implementation of guidelines for the acute care of strokepatients in Germany has been unclear to date. METHODS: The regional quality assurance projects that cooperate in the framework of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Schlaganfall-Register, ADSR) collected data on the care of strokepatients in 627 hospitals in 2012. The quality of the acute hospital care of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was assessed on the basis of 15 standardized, evidence-based quality indicators and compared across the nine participating regional quality assurance projects. RESULTS: Data were obtained on more than 260 000 patients nationwide. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed in 59.7% of eligible ischemic strokepatientspatients (range among participating projects, 49.7-63.6%). Dysphagia screening was documented in 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%). For the following indicators, the defined targets were not reached for all of Germany: anti-aggregation within 48 hours, 93.4% (range, 86.6-96.4%); anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, 77.6% (range, 72.4-80.1%); standardized dysphagia screening, 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%); oral and written information of the patients or their relatives, 86.1% (range, 75.4-91.5%). The rate of patients examined or treated by a speech therapist was in the target range. CONCLUSION: The defined targets were reached for most of the quality indicators. Some indicators, however, varied widely across regional quality assurance projects. This implies that the standardization of care for strokepatients in Germany has not yet been fully achieved.
Authors: P U Heuschmann; P L Kolominsky-Rabas; C Kugler; C Leffmann; B Neundörfer; A Haass; K Lowitzsch; K Berger Journal: Gesundheitswesen Date: 2000-10
Authors: Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas; Peter U Heuschmann; Daniela Marschall; Martin Emmert; Nikoline Baltzer; Bernhard Neundörfer; Oliver Schöffski; Karl J Krobot Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Peter U Heuschmann; Marcel K Biegler; Otto Busse; Susanne Elsner; Armin Grau; Uwe Hasenbein; Peter Hermanek; Rudolf W C Janzen; Peter L Kolominsky-Rabas; Peter L Kolominisky-Rabas; Klaus Kraywinkel; Klaus Lowitzsch; Bjoern Misselwitz; Darius G Nabavi; Kirsten Otten; Ludger Pientka; Gerhard M von Reutern; Erich Bernd Ringelstein; Dirk Sander; Markus Wagner; Klaus Berger Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: P U Heuschmann; S Wiedmann; I Wellwood; A Rudd; A Di Carlo; Y Bejot; D Ryglewicz; D Rastenyte; C D A Wolfe Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maike M Grube; Christian Dohle; Diana Djouchadar; Petra Rech; Karen Bienek; Ursula Dietz-Fricke; Michael Jöbges; Martin Kohler; Isabelle Missala; Bertram Schönherr; Cordula Werner; Helen Zeytountchian; Jörg Wissel; Peter U Heuschmann Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Thomas Petzold; Gitta Helaß; D Michael Albrecht; Jochen Schmitt Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Max Geraedts; Dijana Ebbeler; Nina Timmesfeld; Manfred Kaps; Klaus Berger; Björn Misselwitz; Christian Günster; Patrik Dröge; Michael Schneider Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Robert Mikulik; Michal Bar; David Cernik; Roman Herzig; Rene Jura; Lubomir Jurak; Jiri Neumann; Daniel Sanak; Svatopluk Ostry; Petr Sevcik; Ondrej Skoda; David Skoloudik; Daniel Vaclavik; Ales Tomek Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2021-04-12
Authors: Peter Nydahl; Gabriele Bartoszek; Andreas Binder; Laura Paschen; Nils G Margraf; Karsten Witt; Andre Ewers Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Daniel S Scholz; Sönke Rohde; Nikou Nikmaram; Hans-Peter Brückner; Michael Großbach; Jens D Rollnik; Eckart O Altenmüller Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 4.003