Literature DB >> 21290267

[What is evidence-based concerning quality management? Thoughts about an apparently simple question].

M Eberlein-Gonska1.   

Abstract

Quality management has become more important due to the growing pressure for change within the healthcare sector. Responsible for this are driving forces that include not only competition and legislation, but also society. Therefore, quality management has developed especially in the direction of structural organization, process orientation, and professionalism. However, there is a lack of information concerning the scientific, evidence-based evaluation of activities, measures, and projects. Current studies and data are not able to answer questions concerning a strong correlation between quality management activities and treatment effects, and the influence on the whole system remains open. The reason for this is the complexity of the different dynamic factors influencing the benefit assessment. Single investigations can only indicate specific aspects of the multifaceted term quality analysis. There is a high demand for scientific and proven methods as well as for the understanding that scientifically established answers can only be given to well-defined and specific questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21290267     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-010-1204-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  4 in total

1.  [Costs and benefits of quality management].

Authors:  I Schroeder-Printzen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Certified clinical excellence : Suitable tool for patient recruitment?].

Authors:  B Ehrenstein; M Fleck
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  The incidence and determinants of decubitus ulcers in hospital care: an analysis of routine quality management data at a university hospital.

Authors:  Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Thomas Petzold; Gitta Helaß; D Michael Albrecht; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Quality Measurement Recommendations Relevant to Clinical Guidelines in Germany and the United Kingdom: (What) Can We Learn From Each Other?

Authors:  Thomas Petzold; Stefanie Deckert; Paula R Williamson; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.