| Literature DB >> 29756474 |
Davood Hekmatpou1, Fatemeh Ahmadian1, Maryam Eghbali2, Shadi Farsaei2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Henna has been used to combat various diseases and pathological conditions of the skin. This study aimed to determine the cooling and protecting effects of henna on prevention of decubitus ulcers in critical care units.Entities:
Keywords: Braden’s scale; Lawsonia inermis; decubitus ulcers; intensive care unit
Year: 2018 PMID: 29756474 PMCID: PMC5954567 DOI: 10.1177/2515690X18772807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evid Based Integr Med ISSN: 2515-690X
Figure 1.High-performance liquid chromatography–ultraviolet analysis of the Lawsonia inermis extract at 280 nm.
Figure 2.Standard plot of Lawson (dash interval) and sample of Lawsonia inermis (Area 1, 353617; Area 2, 369915; Area 3, 367549).
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.CONSORT flow chart.
Comparison of Demographic Characteristics of Intervention and Control Groups of Henna Effect on Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Settings.
| Demographic Characteristics | Group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention, Mean ± SD | Control, Mean ± SD | ||
| Age | 51.35 ± 17 | 52.94 ± 19.61 | .7 |
| Body mass index | 23.85 ± 3.19 | 24.43 ± 3.72 | .4 |
| Consciousness level | 10.59 ± 3.58 | 9.40 ± 3.83 | .17 |
| Serum albumin | 3.31 ± 0.63 | 3.16 ± 0.60 | .3 |
| Probable duration of hospitalization | 7.51 ± 1.70 | 7.71 ± 1.93 | .6 |
| Systole blood pressure | 127.84 ± 15.8 | 130.67 ± 15.08 | .4 |
| Diastole blood pressure | 77.93 ± 8.8 | 78.62 ± 8.7 | .7 |
Mean of Braden Score of Pressure Ulcer in the 3 Time Periods Among Intervention and Control Groups.
| Mean of Braden Score (Days) | Group | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| First | Control | 11.7 ± 2.5 |
| Intervention | 12.7 ± 3.07 | |
| Fourth | Control | 13.5 ± 2.8 |
| Intervention | 14.8 ± 3.4 | |
| Seventh | Control | 15.2 ± 3.8 |
| Intervention | 16.2 ± 3.7 |
Comparison of Risk Rate of Braden Score of Pressure Ulcer in the 3 Time Periods Among Intervention and Control Groups.
| Risk of Pressure Ulcers | Intervention Group | Control Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Day | Fourth Day | Seventh Day | First Day | Fourth Day | Seventh Day | |
| Moderate to high risk (%) | 75.6 | 45.9 | 35.1 | 85.7 | 68.6 | 51.4 |
| Low risk (%) | 13.5 | 32.4 | 24.3 | 8.6 | 20 | 17.1 |
| No risk (%) | 10.8 | 21.6 | 40.5 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 31.4 |
Comparison of Means of Sacral Local Temperatures During 1 Week Among the Intervention and Control Groups.
| Mean of Sacral Local Temperatures (Day) | Group | Mean ± SD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Control | 0.6 ± 37.9 | 3.51 | .001 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37.3 | |||
| Second | Control | 0.6 ± 37.9 | 1.43 | .281 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37.7 | |||
| Third | Control | 0.9 ± 38.08 | 0.413 | .457 |
| Intervention | 0.8 ± 38 | |||
| Fourth | Control | 1.1 ± 38.1 | 0.580 | .239 |
| Intervention | 0.8 ± 38.1 | |||
| Fifth | Control | 0.9 ± 38.2 | 1.43 | .481 |
| Intervention | 0.8 ± 37.9 | |||
| Sixth | Control | 0.8 ± 37.9 | 0.392 | .177 |
| Intervention | 0.7 ± 37.9 | |||
| Seventh | Control | 0.6 ± 38.3 | 1.18 | .370 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37.8 | |||
| Total mean (during a week) | Control | 38.06 ± 0.41 | 1.48 | .14 |
| Intervention | 37.48 ± 0.15 |
Comparison of Means of Forehead Local Temperatures During 1 Week Among Intervention and Control Groups.
| Mean of Forehead Local Temperatures (Day) | Group | Mean ± SD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Control | 0.53 ± 36.9 | 1.2 | .722 |
| Intervention | 0.3 ± 37.08 | |||
| Second | Control | 0.6 ± 37.07 | 0.221 | .309 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37 | |||
| Third | Control | 0.6 ± 37 | 0.533 | .937 |
| Intervention | 0.5 ± 37 | |||
| Fourth | Control | 0.6 ± 36.9 | 1.78 | .560 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37.2 | |||
| Fifth | Control | 0.6 ± 37.2 | 1.70 | .582 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37 | |||
| Sixth | Control | 0.6 ± 36.7 | 1.72 | .602 |
| Intervention | 0.6 ± 37 | |||
| Seventh | Control | 0.6 ± 37 | 0.475 | .865 |
| Intervention | 0.4 ± 37 | |||
| Total mean (during a week) | Control | 37.03 ± 0.44 | 0.675 | .5 |
| Intervention | 37.09 ± 0.41 |