Literature DB >> 32517624

Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour in D. simulans.

Allison Jaffe1, Madeline P Burns1, Julia B Saltz1.   

Abstract

Social interactions can influence the expression and underlying genetic basis of many traits. Yet, empirical investigations of indirect genetic effects (IGEs) and genotype-by-genotype epistasis-quantitative genetics parameters representing the role of genetic variation in a focal individual and its interacting partners in producing the observed trait values-are still scarce. While it is commonly observed that an individual's traits are influenced by the traits of interacting conspecifics, representing social plasticity, studying this social plasticity and its quantitative-genetic basis is notoriously challenging. These challenges are compounded when individuals interact in groups, rather than (simpler) dyads. Here, we investigate the genetic architecture of social plasticity for exploratory behaviour, one of the most intensively studied behaviours in recent decades. Using genotypes of Drosophila simulans, we measured genotypes both alone, and in social groups representing a mix of two genotypes. We found that females adjusted their exploratory behaviour based on the behaviour of others in the group, representing social plasticity. However, the direction of this plasticity depended on the identity of group members: focal individuals were more likely to emerge from a refuge if group members who were the same genotype as the focal remained inside for longer. By contrast, focal individuals were less likely to emerge from a refuge if partner-genotype group members remained inside for longer. Exploratory behaviour also depended on the identities of both genotypes that composed the group. Together, these findings demonstrate genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour both within and among groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; indirect genetic effects; quantitative genetics; social plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32517624      PMCID: PMC7341925          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  47 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Strong and weak cross-sex correlations govern the quantitative-genetic architecture of social group choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adam P Geiger; Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Survival analysis: part 15 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Isabella Zwiener; Maria Blettner; Gerhard Hommel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Assortative mating in animals.

Authors:  Yuexin Jiang; Daniel I Bolnick; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Social structure and indirect genetic effects: genetics of social behaviour.

Authors:  Jonathan Schneider; Jade Atallah; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-03-18

8.  Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines.

Authors:  Wen Huang; Andreas Massouras; Yutaka Inoue; Jason Peiffer; Miquel Ràmia; Aaron M Tarone; Lavanya Turlapati; Thomas Zichner; Dianhui Zhu; Richard F Lyman; Michael M Magwire; Kerstin Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; Kyle Chang; Lisa L Ellis; Sonia Fernandez; Yi Han; Gareth Highnam; Carl E Hjelmen; John R Jack; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Sandy Lee; Lora Lewis; Mala Munidasa; Fiona Ongeri; Shohba Patel; Lora Perales; Agapito Perez; LingLing Pu; Stephanie M Rollmann; Robert Ruth; Nehad Saada; Crystal Warner; Aneisa Williams; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiqing Zhang; Yiming Zhu; Robert R H Anholt; Jan O Korbel; David Mittelman; Donna M Muzny; Richard A Gibbs; Antonio Barbadilla; J Spencer Johnston; Eric A Stone; Stephen Richards; Bart Deplancke; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Julien Ayroles; Daniel R Matute; Andrew D Kern
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Indirect genetic effects: a key component of the genetic architecture of behaviour.

Authors:  Francesca Santostefano; Alastair J Wilson; Petri T Niemelä; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Indirect Genetic Effects: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Amelie Baud; Sarah McPeek; Nancy Chen; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.679

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.