Literature DB >> 15795865

Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.

Allen J Moore1, Tommaso Pizzari.   

Abstract

Evolutionary conflict arises between reproductive partners when alternative reproductive opportunities are available. Sexual conflict can generate sexually antagonistic selection, which mediates sexual selection and intersexual coevolution. However, despite intense interest, the evolutionary implications of sexual conflict remain unresolved. We propose a novel theoretical approach to study the evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes based on quantitative genetics and the measure of social selection arising from male-female interactions. We consider the phenotype of one sex as both a genetically influenced evolving trait as well as the (evolving) social environment in which the phenotype of the opposite sex evolves. Several important points emerge from our analysis, including the relationship between direct selection on one sex and indirect effects through selection on the opposite sex. We suggest that the proposed approach may be a valuable tool to complement other theoretical approaches currently used to study sexual conflict. Most importantly, our approach highlights areas where additional empirical data can help clarify the role of sexual conflict in the evolutionary process.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795865     DOI: 10.1086/429354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  22 in total

1.  Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ).

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Estimation of heritability, evolvability and genetic correlations of two pollen and pistil traits involved in a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae).

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Stefan Andersson; Asa Lankinen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sexual conflict as a partitioning of selection.

Authors:  David F Westneat; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Prenatal environmental effects match offspring begging to parental provisioning.

Authors:  Camilla A Hinde; Katherine L Buchanan; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Chemical Cues that Guide Female Reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Genetic association between male attractiveness and female differential allocation.

Authors:  Megan L Head; John Hunt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.

Authors:  Samuel S Snow; Suzanne H Alonzo; Maria R Servedio; Richard O Prum
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.