Literature DB >> 31455170

Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

J S Martin1,2,3, N Staes4,5,6, A Weiss7,8, J M G Stevens4,5, A V Jaeggi1,2.   

Abstract

Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with social dominance in human and non-human primates, which may reflect the effects of testosterone on facial morphology and behaviour. Given that testosterone facilitates status-seeking motivation, the association between fWHR and behaviour should be contingent on the relative costs and benefits of particular dominance strategies across species and socioecological contexts. We tested this hypothesis in bonobos (Pan paniscus), who exhibit female dominance and rely on both affiliation and aggression to achieve status. We measured fWHR from facial photographs, affiliative dominance with Assertiveness personality scores and agonistic dominance with behavioural data. Consistent with our hypothesis, agonistic and affiliative dominance predicted fWHR in both sexes independent of age and body weight, supporting the role of status-seeking motivation in producing the link between fWHR and socioecologically relevant dominance behaviour across primates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bonobo; dominance; fWHR; motivation; personality; socioecology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31455170      PMCID: PMC6731484          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  32 in total

1.  The face-time continuum: lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions.

Authors:  Eric Hehman; Jordan B Leitner; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-10-02

Review 2.  The role of testosterone in social interaction.

Authors:  Christoph Eisenegger; Johannes Haushofer; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face.

Authors:  Konstanze Meindl; Sonja Windhager; Bernard Wallner; Katrin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Facial width-to-height ratio in a large sample of Commonwealth Games athletes.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2015-02-25

5.  Personality and facial morphology: Links to assertiveness and neuroticism in capuchins (Sapajus [Cebus] apella).

Authors:  V Wilson; C E Lefevre; F B Morton; S F Brosnan; A Paukner; T C Bates
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 6.  Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Thomas F Denson; Barnaby J Dixson; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Commentary: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Keith M Welker; Brian M Bird; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-18

8.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Phenotypic integration mediated by hormones: associations among digit ratios, body size and testosterone during tadpole development.

Authors:  Leandro Lofeu; Renata Brandt; Tiana Kohlsdorf
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Peri-pubertal exposure to testicular hormones organizes response to novel environments and social behaviour in adult male rats.

Authors:  Gillian R Brown; Kyle D Kulbarsh; Karen A Spencer; Camille Duval
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.587

View more
  1 in total

1.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.