BACKGROUND: The ability to predict the length of time to death and institutionalization has strong implications for Alzheimer's disease patients and caregivers, health policy, economics, and the design of intervention studies. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prediction algorithm that uses data from a single visit to estimate time to important disease endpoints for individual Alzheimer's disease patients. METHOD: Two separate study cohorts (Predictors 1, N = 252; Predictors 2, N = 254), all initially with mild Alzheimer's disease, were followed for 10 years at three research centers with semiannual assessments that included cognition, functional capacity, and medical, psychiatric, and neurologic information. The prediction algorithm was based on a longitudinal Grade of Membership model developed using the complete series of semiannually-collected Predictors 1 data. The algorithm was validated on the Predictors 2 data using data only from the initial assessment to predict separate survival curves for three outcomes. RESULTS: For each of the three outcome measures, the predicted survival curves fell well within the 95% confidence intervals of the observed survival curves. Patients were also divided into quintiles for each endpoint to assess the calibration of the algorithm for extreme patient profiles. In all cases, the actual and predicted survival curves were statistically equivalent. Predictive accuracy was maintained even when key baseline variables were excluded, demonstrating the high resilience of the algorithm to missing data. CONCLUSION: The new prediction algorithm accurately predicts time to death, institutionalization, and need for full-time care in individual Alzheimer's disease patients; it can be readily adapted to predict other important disease endpoints. The algorithm will serve an unmet clinical, research, and public health need.
BACKGROUND: The ability to predict the length of time to death and institutionalization has strong implications for Alzheimer's diseasepatients and caregivers, health policy, economics, and the design of intervention studies. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prediction algorithm that uses data from a single visit to estimate time to important disease endpoints for individual Alzheimer's diseasepatients. METHOD: Two separate study cohorts (Predictors 1, N = 252; Predictors 2, N = 254), all initially with mild Alzheimer's disease, were followed for 10 years at three research centers with semiannual assessments that included cognition, functional capacity, and medical, psychiatric, and neurologic information. The prediction algorithm was based on a longitudinal Grade of Membership model developed using the complete series of semiannually-collected Predictors 1 data. The algorithm was validated on the Predictors 2 data using data only from the initial assessment to predict separate survival curves for three outcomes. RESULTS: For each of the three outcome measures, the predicted survival curves fell well within the 95% confidence intervals of the observed survival curves. Patients were also divided into quintiles for each endpoint to assess the calibration of the algorithm for extreme patient profiles. In all cases, the actual and predicted survival curves were statistically equivalent. Predictive accuracy was maintained even when key baseline variables were excluded, demonstrating the high resilience of the algorithm to missing data. CONCLUSION: The new prediction algorithm accurately predicts time to death, institutionalization, and need for full-time care in individual Alzheimer's diseasepatients; it can be readily adapted to predict other important disease endpoints. The algorithm will serve an unmet clinical, research, and public health need.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer's disease; full-time care; grade of membership model; nursing home; prediction algorithm; time to death
Authors: Y Stern; M X Tang; M S Albert; J Brandt; D M Jacobs; K Bell; K Marder; M Sano; D Devanand; S M Albert; F Bylsma; W Y Tsai Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Y Stern; M Folstein; M Albert; M Richards; L Miller; F Bylsma; G Lafleche; K Marder; K Bell; M Sano Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 1993 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Joshua R Steinerman; Michael Irizarry; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Susan Raju; Jason Brandt; Marilyn Albert; Deborah Blacker; Bradley Hyman; Yaakov Stern Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-07
Authors: S Cosentino; N Scarmeas; E Helzner; M M Glymour; J Brandt; M Albert; D Blacker; Y Stern Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C Eisdorfer; D Cohen; G J Paveza; J W Ashford; D J Luchins; P B Gorelick; R S Hirschman; S A Freels; P S Levy; T P Semla Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Y Stern; X Liu; M Albert; J Brandt; D M Jacobs; C Del Castillo-Castaneda; K Marder; K Bell; M Sano; F Bylsma; G Lafleche; W Y Tsai Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Adam P Ingber; Jason Hassenstab; Anne M Fagan; Tammie L S Benzinger; Elizabeth A Grant; David M Holtzman; John C Morris; Catherine M Roe Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: W James Deardorff; Deborah E Barnes; Sun Y Jeon; W John Boscardin; Kenneth M Langa; Kenneth E Covinsky; Susan L Mitchell; Elizabeth L Whitlock; Alexander K Smith; Sei J Lee Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Alexander Schmidt-Richberg; Christian Ledig; Ricardo Guerrero; Helena Molina-Abril; Alejandro Frangi; Daniel Rueckert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240